Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

it-student

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Apr 27, 2012
11
0
I recently installed an OCZ Agility 3 240 Gb SSD hard drive in my mid 2009 Macbook Pro.

These are the specs of my Macbook Pro
Model Nr: 5.5 (mid 2009)
Screen: 13"
CPU: 2.53 GHz Core 2 Duo
Memory: 8 Gb 1067 MHz DDR3
OS: OSX Lion

I ran 2 speed tests, first is Blackmagic speedtest, and the second is xbench. I am wondering if these are normal speeds, they seem a little low to me

schermafbeelding2012042.png


diskspeedtest.png


My macbook starts up much faster now (takes about 20 seconds), but I am not sure about the read/write speed.

PS: I already enabled TRIM support.
 
Same drive here, I'm seeing about 185 on both sides of the test on a 2.2 i7 15" in Blackmagic. Keep in mind vs OCZ's specs BlackMagic uses only incompressible data so #'s are lower.

You do a reset after installing? I'm wondering if it hasn't seen the SATA interface speed change.
 
This is my MacBookPro8,2 with 512g Crucial M4 running xbench and black magic, both out of the box w/no setting changes.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2012-04-27 at 9.02.52 AM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2012-04-27 at 9.02.52 AM.jpg
    102.1 KB · Views: 267
  • Screen Shot 2012-04-27 at 9.35.03 AM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2012-04-27 at 9.35.03 AM.jpg
    174.9 KB · Views: 187
  • ssdinfo.jpg
    ssdinfo.jpg
    47.6 KB · Views: 159
I dunno, but I have the Early 2011 MBP 13", installed the 256 Crucial M4 last night and get 260 Write and 500 Read in the "Disk Speed Test"

Hmm, enable trim? I didn't do that. I thought Lion did it automatically?
 
Here is both results from Xbench and Blackmagic Speed test,

Model : Macbook Unibody late 2008 (Macbook 5,1)
Screen : 13"
CPU : Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz
Ram : 8GB Crucial 1066 MHz DDR3
SSD : 256 GB Plextor m3
OS : OS X Lion 10.7.3
 

Attachments

  • Macbook2.jpg
    Macbook2.jpg
    47.3 KB · Views: 181
  • Diskspeed.jpg
    Diskspeed.jpg
    202.4 KB · Views: 214
  • Diskspeed2.jpg
    Diskspeed2.jpg
    95.7 KB · Views: 186
Same drive here, I'm seeing about 185 on both sides of the test on a 2.2 i7 15" in Blackmagic. Keep in mind vs OCZ's specs BlackMagic uses only incompressible data so #'s are lower.

You do a reset after installing? I'm wondering if it hasn't seen the SATA interface speed change.

What should I reset?
 
This is my MacBookPro8,2 with 512g Crucial M4 running xbench and black magic, both out of the box w/no setting changes.

You didn't allow BlackMagic to run one cycle of tests, since the read values in your BlackMagic test have not been filled in, so the results are useless for any comparison.

it-student, here are the xbench results for an OCZ Vertex 3 256 GB. The Agility is slightly slower than a Vertex 3, but you also have SATA II in your 2009 MBP.

However, your numbers are far lower than they should be even taking those two factors into consideration. Since it's a Sandforce drive, I would not recommend enabling TRIM - it's not necessary. There is a problem here and a week or two ago somebody had a similar problem with his MBP. I cannot remember what he did to fix and get full speed, but it will pay you to search for this thread.

Oops, forgot the screenshot. I could probably get slightly better results since my computer is busy doing stuff, but it's good enough for a comparison.

ScreenShot2012-04-27at164643.png


----------

I dunno, but I have the Early 2011 MBP 13", installed the 256 Crucial M4 last night and get 260 Write and 500 Read in the "Disk Speed Test"

Hmm, enable trim? I didn't do that. I thought Lion did it automatically?

If you're not having issues, then don't enable TRIM. Lion does it automatically for Apple supplied SSDs only. Don't worry about it.
 
Last edited:
You didn't allow BlackMagic to run one cycle of tests, since the read values in your BlackMagic test have not been filled in, so the results are useless for any comparison.

Aah - roger that. Here'a more complete run.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2012-04-27 at 11.23.49 AM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2012-04-27 at 11.23.49 AM.jpg
    196.6 KB · Views: 140
Thanks for that.

ScreenShot2012-04-27at173106.png


Maybe it's not the best time to compare, because, as I said, my computer is busy with something in the background, but it's interesting to see that my xbench results are better than yours, yet your Blackmagic results are higher than mine. Clearly the M4 is faster when dealing with incompressible data.
 
Is this normal?

schermafbeelding2012042g.png


The language is Dutch, but the weird thing is that the link speed should be 3Gb, but negotiated link speed is 1.5 Gb? :confused:
 
Ok I fixed the problem. It had something to do with the negotiated link speed being just 1.5G. I fixed the problem by downloading an .iso file from OCZ and making it bootable, this iso contains a script that should fix this problem.

http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/f...-of-3Gb-s-link&p=695128&viewfull=1#post695128

Image


Image

This topc can be closed!

BTW, Beware about incompatible issue between SF-2281 and Nvidia MCP79. I hope that OCZ fixed this, because most of the SSD with SATA III running Sandforce Chipset will use SF 2281. A lot of people have problem when using for a while.
 
BTW, Beware about incompatible issue between SF-2281 and Nvidia MCP79. I hope that OCZ fixed this, because most of the SSD with SATA III running Sandforce Chipset will use SF 2281. A lot of people have problem when using for a while.
Can you elaborate more on this? Because I think I can still bring this drive back and get another one.
 
Ok I fixed the problem. It had something to do with the negotiated link speed being just 1.5G. I fixed the problem by downloading an .iso file from OCZ and making it bootable, this iso contains a script that should fix this problem.

That's right in line with where mine is. Run it and call it good :)

When I was saying reset before I was talking SMC, since the numbers didn't appear to reflect a higher link speed, which you've now remedied.
 
Intel 330

I´m having the exact same problem, except it´s with a new Intel 330 ssd. The negotiated link speed is set to 1,5 GBit, but my MacBook Pro (5.1, Late 2008 unibody) has SATA II (3 GBit) (See pic). I noticed that this Intel 330 drive has the same Sandforce controller as the OCZ Agility 3 mentioned here. Sadly Intel does not provide the same tool for setting the negotiated link speed as OCZ does.

Any suggestions? Since it´s the same controller, can i try the OCZ tool?
 

Attachments

  • Intel330.jpg
    Intel330.jpg
    75.1 KB · Views: 110
I´m having the exact same problem, except it´s with a new Intel 330 ssd. The negotiated link speed is set to 1,5 GBit, but my MacBook Pro (5.1, Late 2008 unibody) has SATA II (3 GBit) (See pic). I noticed that this Intel 330 drive has the same Sandforce controller as the OCZ Agility 3 mentioned here. Sadly Intel does not provide the same tool for setting the negotiated link speed as OCZ does.

Any suggestions? Since it´s the same controller, can i try the OCZ tool?
You can definitely try. But backup your whole system first.
 
Can you elaborate more on this? Because I think I can still bring this drive back and get another one.

Some people have slower drive and some have freeze experience after 1-2 months. I am doing my research before getting my pleater m3 on my Macbook aluminum Unibody, most of them cause by Sandforce SF2281 and Nvidia MCP79P Chipset and it happened not only for Mac Laptop! MacBook Pro with Intel Chipset seem to have less problem about that.

At first, I think about Agility 3 due to price factor. After I read a lot of comment about how unreliable OCZ drive is, OCZ seem to have QC Issue lately and some of users had bad experience about it.
 
At first, I think about Agility 3 due to price factor. After I read a lot of comment about how unreliable OCZ drive is, OCZ seem to have QC Issue lately and some of users had bad experience about it.

Well, I can say that I've had my Agility in three different machines now and it's been flawless in all. You read about the complaints on the internet, rarely do the people that have no issue go from forum to forum saying how good it is.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.