http://www.ebay.com/itm/Very-Nice-A...D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557
I wouldn't be suprised to see it re-listed.
I wouldn't be suprised to see it re-listed.
I had a zero rating once.Have to like the fact it's people with 0 ratings that make the bids super high!
Something is worth what someone is willing to pay for it. I spent $150 on a late 2006 black MacBook even though I have much newer systems (late 2012 rMBP, 2013 MBA). I even spent $45 on a G3 iBook. I bought them because I had specific reasons to do so.I'm not sure I understand any PB G4 pricing any more. Looking around today I see http://www.ebay.com/itm/Apple-Mac-Powerbook-G4-15-Works-Perfectly-/131208613843?pt=Apple_Laptops&hash=item1e8ca48fd3 which is at $180 for a 15" that is only distinguished by having a 160GB drive.
Then there is http://www.ebay.com/itm/Apple-PowerBook-G4-1-67-GHz-15-1-5-GB-RAM-HDD-80GB-PERFECT-/161325958705?pt=Apple_Laptops&hash=item258fc6c631 which is, at least, a 1.67ghz system, but is over $100 *plus* $54 for shipping.
Is any PB G4 worth > $100, let alone >$150? It seems like if I'm going to spend $150 then I should probably be looking at an early MacBook instead.
Something is worth what someone is willing to pay for it.
You have two kinds of sellers here that explain this.Agreed, but where is the common sense? I can see, for instance, where a PB 180 might demand a higher price than a PB G4. In that case, there are less surviving examples of the former and many of those are in the hands of collectors. Even your iBook G3 probably falls into this case.
Here, though, we are talking a comparative commodity. There should be a point where the buyer is saying "Hey! That's too much. I'll just bid on this other one instead," but that point appears not to be happening in these cases.
That's the part I don't get.
You have two kinds of sellers here that explain this.
The first kind is the kind that has zero idea of what they are selling. They have no idea about PowerPC/Intel and the Mac runs OS X. It looks a lot like the newer Macs and they don't look too close at it. They are expecting to get a price similar to what they are seeing other (Intel) Macs selling for.
The second kind of seller knows what they have. But they also know that there are plenty of buyers out there who don't. They are going to take advantage of pricing on current (Intel) Macs and try and make a buck by selling their PowerPC Mac at those prices. Someone gullible will walk into it.
Honestly, I'm starting to find that the business equipment liquidators are the best route, at least on eBay. Generally, these people deal with PC equipment and have no idea what they have. But instead of assuming, like the first kind of seller I mentioned, that they have a modern Mac they take the opposite route. Because they don't know what they have they underprice the sale.
I scored a perfectly good iBook G4 1.42Ghz recently for $40 this way. The only thing "wrong" with it was that it needed a new OS installed. The previous owner had smartly wiped the hard drive and turned it over to the liquidator. The liquidator couldn't even find the serial and sold it as for parts or repair because it booted with a "?" mark on the screen. Full ram, 60GB hard drive, perfect screen, trackpad and keyboard. BT, Airport, everything. This is my second score on sellers like this.
Agreed, but where is the common sense? I can see, for instance, where a PB 180 might demand a higher price than a PB G4. In that case, there are less surviving examples of the former and many of those are in the hands of collectors. Even your iBook G3 probably falls into this case.
Here, though, we are talking a comparative commodity. There should be a point where the buyer is saying "Hey! That's too much. I'll just bid on this other one instead," but that point appears not to be happening in these cases.
That's the part I don't get.
Well, the buyers can be uneducated too. 2006 is ancient history in the computer world. If you could poll the Mac users and potential Mac users of today I would bet you'd find that a majority of them are unaware of the Intel transition.Okay, but what's with the buyers? Respectfully, whoever paid $530 for the 17" PB G4 was an idiot. At what point, if ever, would he have stopped bidding and moved on to another auction? Ditto for the 15" at $180.
Did they? When I see someone with zero feedback bidding up an auction I suspect it's the seller bid up their item.Okay, but what's with the buyers? Respectfully, whoever paid $530 for the 17" PB G4 was an idiot. At what point, if ever, would he have stopped bidding and moved on to another auction? Ditto for the 15" at $180.
Did they? When I see someone with zero feedback bidding up an auction I suspect it's the seller bid up their item.
Did they? When I see someone with zero feedback bidding up an auction I suspect it's the seller bid up their item.