Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
6 Plus 2GB RAM Macworld UK says so
- Thread starter Gooberton
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
"Early benchmarking using the Geekbench application suggests that the processor is dual core, and has a frequency of 1.4 GHz. It's paired with 2GB RAM. The iPhone 6 Plus is consummately slick and zippy in use"
Sounds like the real deal.
Dang.. maybe I should get a 6+
That could potentially be the deal breaker for the 6.
Sounds like the real deal.
Dang.. maybe I should get a 6+
That could potentially be the deal breaker for the 6.
A simple Google search for the word "Phablet" returns the Wikipedia entry for Phablets as the first returned result. I was going to link to it for you but then figured if I can put forth the effort to do that then you can to.
If you aren't a 13 year old girl, you sure talk like one.
.....and unless I've missed something, who is to say there will be a RAM difference vs the regular 6 to begin with? What if they both have 2gb? Then will you be "jelly" that your extra RAM will go to powering a display you can hardly hold, while the 6 uses it for extra processing power?
Judging by the responses in RAM threads here, 90% of people don't think the iPhone needs more than 1GB of RAM....so why would they cry that the 6+ has 'too much'?
I seriously cringe every time I hear that term. And everyone here seems to be adopting it readily. I won't call it that, though. Sounds too close to FAPlet.
It's enormous, that's why I'm not getting it. It's just too big with the bezels.
On another note, I'll take Apples RGB accurate LCD display over the Samsung over saturated AMOLED junk any day of the week.
I'll be glad when this is settled and we can move onto the iPad and possibly the iPod T.
If I had to bet on this one, I'd bet that it had 1G of RAM but it wouldn't be a confident bet.
Is this actually true? I thought issues regarding AMOLED saturation were solved a while ago, no? And I thought Samsung's display was considered one ofif not thebest.
Makes me wonder why Apple has never considered AMOLED displays for their iPhones. AMOLED is much more battery efficient.
No. Well, maybe it was solved but Samsung and most of the other players still oversaturate like crazy.
For example, watch this vid around the 20 through 25 minute mark
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kDTMYsFnM-8
Last edited: