Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

sparkie7

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Oct 17, 2008
2,520
285
Just had a look on Settings > general > about & it says a capacity of 55:6 GB. Does it mean that 8.4 GB is taken up by IOS?

Just checking to see if this is normal..
 
Just had a look on Settings > general > about & it says a capacity of 55:6 GB. Does it mean that 8.4 GB is taken up by IOS?

Just checking to see if this is normal..

Yes it's normal and the iWork's package should be installed by default too.
 
It's 64 before being formatted, the same with all storage devices. After format it likely only had 59-60gb left. Add the OS and there you go.
 
Also, there are little issues with all RAM products....dead cells, without going into a long explanation. It's always been this way.

My first iPhone 6 64gb had 58.4gb free on initial startup. My second one had 56.9gb free on initial startup.

I have a 6 Plus 128gb on order. I wonder what that will show? But, since those are made of unobtanium, who knows when I will find out!?!?!? :rolleyes:
 
Normal. That's what mine says too.

Though, I've always wondered why the larger storage devices have so more more storage taken up by the OS and system.

My 32GB iPhone had 27.8GB Free
My 64GB iPad had 57GB Free
My 64GB iPhone 6 has 55.6 Free
When I had a 128GB iPad Air it only had like 116GB Free
 
Normal. That's what mine says too.

Though, I've always wondered why the larger storage devices have so more more storage taken up by the OS and system.

My 32GB iPhone had 27.8GB Free
My 64GB iPad had 57GB Free
My 64GB iPhone 6 has 55.6 Free
When I had a 128GB iPad Air it only had like 116GB Free

Its not that the OS is taking up more space, it's that the labeled capacity isn't the same as formatted capacity. spacemnspiff gives a good explanation of this. Using his given example of 64GB = 59.6 GiB as a base:
32GB -> 29.8GiB and 2 GB for the OS
64GB -> 59.6GiB and 2.6 GB for iPad OS or 4GB for the iPhone OS
128GB ->119.2GiB and 3GB for the OS

lwilliams also pointed out that there are going to be differences just due to the memory not being flawless, and so the capacity would be lowered because of that as well.

Between your 64GB iPad and 64GB iPhone, I'd imagine that they'd have slightly different free space, but not 1.4GB difference.

It's frustrating that the advertised storage isn't the 'available to user' storage, but them are the brakes it seems.
 
Its not that the OS is taking up more space, it's that the labeled capacity isn't the same as formatted capacity. spacemnspiff gives a good explanation of this. Using his given example of 64GB = 59.6 GiB as a base:
32GB -> 29.8GiB and 2 GB for the OS
64GB -> 59.6GiB and 2.6 GB for iPad OS or 4GB for the iPhone OS;)
128GB ->119.2GiB and 3GB for the OS

lwilliams also pointed out that there are going to be differences just due to the memory not being flawless, and so the capacity would be lowered because of that as well.

Between your 64GB iPad and 64GB iPhone, I'd imagine that they'd have slightly different free space, but not 1.4GB difference.

It's frustrating that the advertised storage isn't the 'available to user' storage, but them are the brakes it seems.
Thx, but hasn't this been explained like a thousand times before?
 
Thx, but hasn't this been explained like a thousand times before?

It probably has been. Wouldn't surprise me at all. Back when the issue of the missing space used to bother me, I didn't explore these forums or try to look it up online. I just accepted that a 32GB iPod meant ~27.5GB of music, and a 16GB android phone allowed ~13-14GB of whatever.

I wrote it out just to make sure it was brought to the attention of Traverse. Not sure if they hadn't seen it, or if it went right over their head, just wanted to point it out for their benefit. Trying to be helpful you know?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.