i was really satisfied and still am, but now i look at it less as an ipod and more as a pda device. its just not as simple to use as a classic. its a luxury item.
i was really satisfied and still am, but now i look at it less as an ipod and more as a pda device. its just not as simple to use as a classic. its a luxury item.
That's actually one of the reasons why I bought the iPod touch; I couldn't see myself using the Classic or a Nano as much compared to the iPod touch because they don't have Wi-Fi or E-mail capabilities while the Touch does.
That's actually one of the reasons why I bought the iPod touch; I couldn't see myself using the Classic or a Nano as much compared to the iPod touch because they don't have Wi-Fi or E-mail capabilities while the Touch does.
That's actually one of the reasons why I bought the iPod touch; I couldn't see myself using the Classic or a Nano as much compared to the iPod touch because they don't have Wi-Fi or E-mail capabilities while the Touch does.
Hah, funny, that's one of the big reasons why I DIDN'T get a Touch and got a Classic instead. I already waste too much of my time on the net, if I had it in my pocket and with me at all times then it'd be terrible! But for those who really do need the best net experience they can get at all times, and / or are not prone to wasting time on the net, then I totally understand how the Touch would be a killer device.