Why is 1080P 30 FPS the holy grail of dslrs
Maybe it's the best they can do within the DSLR body of whatever camera(s) you are reviewing? There's a fair amount of relatively cheap consumer camcorders that shoot 1080p60fps. Having looked at the 2 myself, I see great reasons to shoot almost everything at 60fps. So between the 2, I would see 1080p 60fps as my own "holy grail" (for now).
However, as soon as a better standard comes along in a consumer product (at a consumer price point), I'll likely change that opinion and move on to it. Cameras & camcorders shoot videos you'll never get to shoot again. You only get to shoot family at this age now. Children are only children for so long. Someone's newborn is only new born once. Some important relative in your life today may not still be in your life in a month or year or few years. A child's bigger events only occur once. Etc. My advice: capture them while you can as good as you can.
My father died a couple of years ago. My grandfather died in 1974. All these years later, I can't hardly remember what my Grandfather's voice sounded like, how did he laugh, etc. But I can hear my Dad's voice on demand through all of the video we shot over the last couple of decades. I sure would love to have something similar of my Grandfather... and his parents... and their parents... etc. Step back just 4+ generations in my family and I don't even know names of people that were extraordinarily important to my existence. I'd sure love to "know" them too.
In my house, we prize old 8mm silent film home movies because they were around at a time when we could capture video of relatives long since gone. Even without sound, moving imagery of those loved ones is generally treasured more than still photos of the same people. They seem "more alive" in motion. My Grandfather lives on there.
Since the 1980's, the mainstream have had a new tool to create these lasting memories with sound through various incarnations of camcorders. From that point on, another way for us to "live" for well beyond our years is realized. 4 generations from now, if my descendants wonder what their great, great grandfather looked like, how he sounded, laughed, moved, etc, they'll likely be able to just call up some old 1080p60fps on their iPhone 95. Whether they'll covet that like I covet such video is unknown... but at least they'll have the
option of knowing their family line in ways beyond old, faded still photos... or nothing.
Currently, consumers can reach 1080p 60fps without breaking the bank. That's a pretty great standard for recording forever memories with sound. If you can't reach that, 1080p30fps is generally better than capturing video at 720p or 480p or 320x200 and so on.
I don't think any resolution and fps can be an all-encompassing "holy grail." It's all "eye of the beholder". A few years from now, 1080p might be slipping away in consumer equipment much like SD resolutions are fading out today.
RedTomato nailed the 24fps comment in the first paragraph of post 14. It's not that 24fps is superior... unless "superior" is measured by cheapest in its day. I bet if a time traveler could take 30fps or 60fps technology back and make it available at equal cost to 24fps, the "old standard" would be something superior to 24fps. Purists will talk about that "film look" etc but even the big dogs like Jackson and Cameron are cranking up the fps numbers for impending projects. I think I read that Avatar 2 is going to be shot at 60fps. Perhaps they are not "purists".