Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Video

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Sep 2, 2012, 12:06 AM   #1
nateo200
macrumors 68030
 
nateo200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rendering......
Why do we even use Tape and XDCAM Discs anymore?

Why do we even use Tape and XDCAM Discs anymore? I don't get this AT ALL!!! I get old happens never die and that we have the stuff laying around but I sill don't get why we don't hook our cameras, computers with NLE software right into high speed flash media!!!! I can write at 95MB/s onto Sandisks high end flash drives as much as I want and it don't spin or get jammed from the weather!!! I don't understand why a Sont XDCAM HD throws data onto Professional Disc which while reusable seams dumb....

I get the cost factor but that only seams present when you need to distribute the format....

When AVCHD cameras first came out or maybe they weren't AVCHD, anyways I saw these camcorders that recorded video to full size DVD's and then smaller DVDs and I wondered why they could just record onto a hard drive or flash drive? Why waste disc formats on something your presumably going to need to edit...RED seams to have this idea down since there cameras have been based on a file based work flow since the start but why are people settling for non-file based work flows? I pop a SD card into my camera and record a full HD image at 100mbps then pop it into my computer and its there...can someone explain why Sony, Panasonic and some others are stuck on what looks like advanced Betacam workflow!?
__________________
-15" rMBP 2.4/8/256/650M, FCP X, AE CS5.5, PS CS6
-USB3 180GB SSD, Intensity Shuttle Thunderbolt
-*64GB Space Grey iPhone 6*
-Canon 550D, GoPro3 Black
nateo200 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 2, 2012, 05:09 AM   #2
daybreak
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
With most items one factor is the age one was bought up with equipment and what was on the market.
Over night people are not going to discard what system they have and manufactures of equipment still find a market for tape material.
I agree with you regards the question "WHY".
I still use tape for my major video productions as i had invested large sum of money and it still all works. I use SD card for my family home video movies or for scouting locations.
daybreak is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 2, 2012, 05:34 AM   #3
anim8or
macrumors 65816
 
anim8or's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Scotland, UK
Tapes and XDCAM discs are are more reliable media for archiving. Broadcasters and studios will aways use media that is more robust whether it be expensive or not, in this case physical media is cheaper so for them its a win/win. The only downside is where to store it all, but they always find some space for a library in these places.

Storing for archiving purposes on hard drives that could fail at any time is never a good idea, even if you have multiple copies something always gets lost.

Having worked for a broadcaster I also have experienced a few occasions when a member of production who hasn't the first clue about file based workflows etc erases a hard drive or CF Card without actually transferring the data onto another medium, whole segment of a show lost in a blink of an eye.

In years to come when all of the technophobes have been weeded out there may be more of a chance of an entirely file based through put but until then i wouldn't count on it.

An phrase i have heard on this topic a few times as well is 'As lng as the History channel is on the air, there will always be tapes and physical media around', i'm paraphrasing of course!
__________________
2010 Mac Pro, 2.66GHz 12-Core, 32GB RAM, 4 TB HDD; 13" Macbook (Aluminium), 2.4GHz , 4GB RAM, 250GB HD; 16GB iPhone 4; 16GB iPad 2 Black w/ Black Leather Smart Cover
anim8or is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 2, 2012, 05:46 AM   #4
yoak
macrumors 65816
 
yoak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oslo, Norway
Many reasons why people use xdcam disks. It's cheap archival. If you shoot straight to cards, you have to empty them and reuse them. That means having asking multiple backups on hard drives all the time. Hard drives are not very good for long time storage, as they will fail even, or especially if not used for a long time.

I only own cameras recording to different card formats. Sony's SxS cards, they cost $650 for 32gb card that holds about 2 hours of footage.
For my RED camera it's different story, a 128GB card costs about $2000 and holds 1-2 hours or less depending on the compression rate etc I shoot at.

So often on a production you would have to off load cards every night, to reuse them the next day. This takes time at the end of a long shooting day.


With xdcam disks, you just put them on the shelf and grab new ones for the next day.

Tape I haven't used professionally for the last 3 years


Edit: anim8or posted while I wrote my reply. Cover some of the same things I can see
__________________
2.8ghz MP Octo
2,66ghz MBP, SSD Corsair Force 240GB, 8GB RAM
12" iBook 1.2ghz 60GB HD & 768RAM
www.sombrafilm.com
yoak is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 2, 2012, 09:51 AM   #5
nateo200
Thread Starter
macrumors 68030
 
nateo200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rendering......
Thanks for the reply's everyone! I mean I understand archival purposes, the lady I work for on and off used to be heavy into broadcast and is still sorta is. She's very tech savvy and started off in the Betacam era (resents it like most! haha) but now she uses a Sony HXR-NX5U (not sure of the specific model but I'm pretty sure its this one) and has 9 Sandisk 8GB Extreme's. First thing I asked was "Am I going to have to capture from tape?!?!" thankfully she turned the camera to the side and showed me the SD Card port! Anyways it was just convenient when I was done with the ~30 minute shoot with 3 cameras to load each of the SD cards into my laptop, drop them on my external drive (don't erase the SD cards yet!), and transcode.
----
@Yoak, Can't RED Epic's or maybe its the Scarlet Idk, store to multiple different file based formats? Albeit at a restricted bit rate? I thought you could capture to high end CF cards just at REDCODE's higher compression ratio? But I've talked to just a few RED owners and while they say its a pain to buy the SSD's at first they say it "Just works better"...dont know what that means other than what I would assume is similar to SD cards.

I guess I have no problem with file dumping onto my computer on one project multiple times...unless its impossible to do that but these days yourself or a DIT is hopefully going to have a laptop in case a DP or director wants to look at something in After effects quick or test a feature or something right?
----
I mean I understand the archival reason totally....I have so many things on hard drives that get lost, I had someone break a hard drive with two serious projects on them (with only Standard Def. DVD copy's as backups), and after several losses I simply don't trust a spinning Hard Disc Drive for long term stuff. Its nice to know when things go FUBAR you have a copy on a disc somewhere containing everything you need! I've never used XDCAM disc's and have limited tape experience but my assumption of both is that they are still excellent for backup, I know most TV shows master and archive in HDCAM SR 4:4:4 for this reason. Even some question how long that will last and argue storage on film but those degrade quick if you go cheap and aren't a cheap solution (like $600 for 12minutes of 35mm is it?).
__________________
-15" rMBP 2.4/8/256/650M, FCP X, AE CS5.5, PS CS6
-USB3 180GB SSD, Intensity Shuttle Thunderbolt
-*64GB Space Grey iPhone 6*
-Canon 550D, GoPro3 Black
nateo200 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 2, 2012, 11:34 AM   #6
yoak
macrumors 65816
 
yoak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oslo, Norway
I only have the SSD unit on my EPIC, can't be bothered with CF card. Not even sure the EPIC can use them i know the RED ONE did. The SSD's are just so simple and reliable , albeit expensive. I do have a Panasonic af101 that records to SD cards, as it's avchd and only 4.2.0 color space and fast SD cards can handle that. They are still to expensive to use for archive though.
yoak is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 3, 2012, 01:45 AM   #7
nateo200
Thread Starter
macrumors 68030
 
nateo200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rendering......
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoak View Post
I only have the SSD unit on my EPIC, can't be bothered with CF card. Not even sure the EPIC can use them i know the RED ONE did. The SSD's are just so simple and reliable , albeit expensive. I do have a Panasonic af101 that records to SD cards, as it's avchd and only 4.2.0 color space and fast SD cards can handle that. They are still to expensive to use for archive though.
What would you say would be a reliable consumer level archival solution? Would high quality Blu-ray/DVD's like Sony's Accucore brand be good? Ive recently purchased a set of Sony Accucore BD25's and DVD's and they never have errors....they basically outperform other brands I've seen...Verbatim seams top notch too...I just know XDCAM discs are reliable and Blu-ray was touted as being a bit more durable than DVD.

Side note: I wish 4:2:2 color space would be more readily available for prosumer level devices, granted most don't know but things like chroma key would benefit...I mean you have a RED so your all set, I'm assuming your a Director of Photography or something like that. Is 4:2:2 a big step up for color grading? Only worked on XDCAM422 footage once and I did a light color grade, colors seamed more crisp, but this was before I really knew as much as I do now..
__________________
-15" rMBP 2.4/8/256/650M, FCP X, AE CS5.5, PS CS6
-USB3 180GB SSD, Intensity Shuttle Thunderbolt
-*64GB Space Grey iPhone 6*
-Canon 550D, GoPro3 Black

Last edited by nateo200; Sep 3, 2012 at 01:54 AM.
nateo200 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 3, 2012, 10:05 AM   #8
MisterMe
macrumors G4
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by nateo200 View Post
What would you say would be a reliable consumer level archival solution? ....
What makes you even suspect that Blu-ray BD-R discs--high-quality or otherwise--might be useful as archival media?
__________________
Neither a borrower nor a lender be
For loan oft loses both itself and friend
William Shakespeare from Hamlet
MisterMe is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 4, 2012, 02:38 AM   #9
Anna stacy
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: USA
Well in my opinion, as compared to other tapless technologies XDCAM-HD format has the benefit of being an archival medium. There you can actually put someting in your shelf once shooting done and then you can use post-production techniques.
Anna stacy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 4, 2012, 02:51 AM   #10
yoak
macrumors 65816
 
yoak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oslo, Norway
Quote:
Originally Posted by nateo200 View Post
What would you say would be a reliable consumer level archival solution? Would high quality Blu-ray/DVD's like Sony's Accucore brand be good? Ive recently purchased a set of Sony Accucore BD25's and DVD's and they never have errors....they basically outperform other brands I've seen...Verbatim seams top notch too...I just know XDCAM discs are reliable and Blu-ray was touted as being a bit more durable than DVD.

Side note: I wish 4:2:2 color space would be more readily available for prosumer level devices, granted most don't know but things like chroma key would benefit...I mean you have a RED so your all set, I'm assuming your a Director of Photography or something like that. Is 4:2:2 a big step up for color grading? Only worked on XDCAM422 footage once and I did a light color grade, colors seamed more crisp, but this was before I really knew as much as I do now..
Yes, I'm a DoP.
50bit 422 has been the holy grail in color space for broadcast , as the BBC has set that as a minimum requirement for HD broadcast material delivered to them. (there are exemption to this rule)
It grades better than 420, as it holds up longer before artifacts starts to show.
I don't think to will see it consumer cameras just yet. I think Canons 305 camera is the cheapest camera that has 422, it's a prosumer camera though

I think Blu-Ray would be a good archive medium for a consumer.
yoak is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 4, 2012, 09:18 PM   #11
nateo200
Thread Starter
macrumors 68030
 
nateo200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rendering......
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterMe View Post
What makes you even suspect that Blu-ray BD-R discs--high-quality or otherwise--might be useful as archival media?
I'm asking a question...not to mention I've read up on optical disc formats failing faster depending on brand...not that I ever considered them to be the holy grail of archiving...I usually put my stuff in multiple places and rotate locations and media on a regular basis...I know with film they take older films and re-print them to prevent them from becoming too damaged as well as scanning them with an Arri Scanner or whatever to store digitally...obviously if your work flow is already digital no need for an Arri Scanner.

Quote:
Originally Posted by yoak View Post
Yes, I'm a DoP.
50bit 422 has been the holy grail in color space for broadcast , as the BBC has set that as a minimum requirement for HD broadcast material delivered to them. (there are exemption to this rule)
It grades better than 420, as it holds up longer before artifacts starts to show.
I don't think to will see it consumer cameras just yet. I think Canons 305 camera is the cheapest camera that has 422, it's a prosumer camera though

I think Blu-Ray would be a good archive medium for a consumer.
I know personally I use ProRes 422 for everything, I might use 444 if I include uncompressed still photos in RGB format but even then I think the different is not important...at least not for my own little projects I do. When you say 50bit that sounds insane....I know stuff is often edited at 10, 12, 14, or 16bit uncompressed RGB...am I confused here? I know for broadcast standards they don't like 4:2:0 stuff at all (House MD had to clear it with Fox before they shot on Canon DSLR's, only thing that got them by was the 50mbps of the codec, though that may not be noticeable really).

Also you really think Blu-ray would be a good archive medium? I store and care for my discs very carefully and keep them out of extreme heat or cold and work my best to ensure they don't get bent even the slightest as I know thats a big deal that they stay flat...
__________________
-15" rMBP 2.4/8/256/650M, FCP X, AE CS5.5, PS CS6
-USB3 180GB SSD, Intensity Shuttle Thunderbolt
-*64GB Space Grey iPhone 6*
-Canon 550D, GoPro3 Black
nateo200 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 4, 2012, 10:56 PM   #12
mBox
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Xdcam

We used our last XDCAM Blue Disk back in November 2011.
It was deemed dead the minute we bought into RED three years ago.
We still used it due to the Sonys we have for other long formats.
The XDCAM has joined the betaSP and SVHS deck graveyard in our studio.
Basically a rack that rarely gets opened.
Now its all SSD for us with the RED and soon my personal BMCC.
Wow how times have changed.

*Just to be clear, its ProRes4444 and not 444 right?
I dont know why I read the three fours all over the net when its four fours.
Crap now I sound confused :P
mBox is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 5, 2012, 12:19 AM   #13
yoak
macrumors 65816
 
yoak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oslo, Norway
Quote:
Originally Posted by nateo200 View Post



I know personally I use ProRes 422 for everything, I might use 444 if I include uncompressed still photos in RGB format but even then I think the different is not important...at least not for my own little projects I do. When you say 50bit that sounds insane....I know stuff is often edited at 10, 12, 14, or 16bit uncompressed RGB...am I confused here? I know for broadcast standards they don't like 4:2:0 stuff at all (House MD had to clear it with Fox before they shot on Canon DSLR's, only thing that got them by was the 50mbps of the codec, though that may not be noticeable really).

Also you really think Blu-ray would be a good archive medium? I store and care for my discs very carefully and keep them out of extreme heat or cold and work my best to ensure they don't get bent even the slightest as I know thats a big deal that they stay flat...
My bad. I'm the confused one here, I was tiered when I wrot the reply, I meant 50mbps, not bit

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by mBox View Post
We used our last XDCAM Blue Disk back in November 2011.
It was deemed dead the minute we bought into RED three years ago.
We still used it due to the Sonys we have for other long formats.
The XDCAM has joined the betaSP and SVHS deck graveyard in our studio.
Basically a rack that rarely gets opened.
Now its all SSD for us with the RED and soon my personal BMCC.
Wow how times have changed.

*Just to be clear, its ProRes4444 and not 444 right?
I dont know why I read the three fours all over the net when its four fours.
Crap now I sound confused :P
I think XDCam is far from dead in broadcast, it will be around for a long time. And I say that as a RED EPIC owner. Im often hired to shot on XDCam on different broadcast projects as they are the best cameras for certain formats, like documentaries, "reality" shows etc where you shoot a lot of footage and/or need a quick turnaround.
I love my RED, but the storage requirements are driving me a bit mad. On a lproject this winter we came back with 7 TB of footage, just from the RED camera. Then it was 3 Canon C300 cameras, 5Ds and some sony EX-3 cameras as well. All the other cameras had producedv less GB combined
__________________
2.8ghz MP Octo
2,66ghz MBP, SSD Corsair Force 240GB, 8GB RAM
12" iBook 1.2ghz 60GB HD & 768RAM
www.sombrafilm.com
yoak is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Video

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCP X and XDCAM EX puckhead193 Digital Video 3 Mar 17, 2014 10:02 AM
Tape Hiss? absolut_mac iPod 9 Mar 23, 2013 08:44 AM
XDCAM Footage in Premiere Not Working swwack91 Digital Video 0 Nov 27, 2012 09:07 PM
XDCAM import into FCPX diamond3 Digital Video 5 Nov 21, 2012 12:15 PM
Converting XDCAM EX to ProRes? puckhead193 Digital Video 4 Oct 24, 2012 07:35 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC