Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPod

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Sep 12, 2012, 08:04 PM   #1
Yr Blues
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
The 6th gen was the perfect size

They should drop the shuffle and keep the 6th gen nano

the new nano is like some kind of bastard child of ipod touch
Yr Blues is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 12, 2012, 09:13 PM   #2
webslinger85
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Personally i found the 6th gen rather awkward to hold and control.
webslinger85 is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 12, 2012, 04:42 PM   #3
cnev3
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by webslinger85 View Post
Personally i found the 6th gen rather awkward to hold and control.
I agree. It just did not feel right in my hands.
cnev3 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2012, 01:58 PM   #4
LizKat
macrumors 68000
 
LizKat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Catskill Mountains
Quote:
Originally Posted by cnev3 View Post
I agree. It just did not feel right in my hands.
I clip the 6th gen on the edge of my shirt after hitting play on a nice long playlist I have on there, no problem. Sometimes I switch to a real shuffle (I think of 6th gen as a kind of shuffle), but it's nice to have the little watch on the placket of my shirt.

Love the enlongated screen of the new one. I miss the clip, I think. Pondering a case but I prefer the red and white look it has now.

No wonder Apple keeps the smaller iPod line going, there's a market for all these different types. I really didn't care for the 5th gen, no need for the cam, didn't care for the shape. Others swooned when that came out. I think Apple shrugs and figures "Vive la difference" since they sell millions of all of them. I always look forward to seeing the next one myself.
LizKat is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 12, 2012, 09:43 PM   #5
Huge125
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yr Blues View Post
They should drop the shuffle and keep the 6th gen nano

the new nano is like some kind of bastard child of ipod touch
Agree. While I have never used a 6 gen, I do conceptually like the size. Was hoping for thinner design with BT. I bet it will be back next year. They seem to take more risks on their Nano line.

I don't know what audience they are targeting with this. For me, video is not that big of a benefit as I already have an iPhone and iPad. Guessing the fitness aspect will be greatest draw, just wish they would of kept the smaller form factor.

Sticking with my 3rd gen nano and Nike + dongle for now, unless they come out with some other apps to lure me in. BT is a great addition of course, and creates a whole host of opportunities for apps.
Huge125 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 12, 2012, 09:55 PM   #6
flopticalcube
macrumors G4
 
flopticalcube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the velcro closure of America's Hat
I liked the clip on the 6th gen. I guess these will have to be worked into cases on the 7th. I always thought that the 4th gen was going to be the 3rd with just a touch screen covering the entire front (mini iPod touch). It took all these years to finally work back to that.
__________________
Read the Rules / Search the Forums / Use a Descriptive Title
Mac Won't Boot?
flopticalcube is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 12, 2012, 10:24 PM   #7
Oohara
macrumors 6502a
 
Oohara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
The new Nano looks really weird. The black glass bezel on the black one looks ok but the white bezel on the other colors looks really imbalanced somehow.

And the round icons...wtf? Why? I guess it's because they don't want people expecting this to be a real mini version of the Touch that could run regular apps or something. But it just looks....not quite Apple.

The whole design just lacks clarity and confidence. I really want to...want this thing, but I can't quite bring myself to.
Oohara is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 12, 2012, 10:37 PM   #8
Yr Blues
Thread Starter
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oohara View Post
The new Nano looks really weird. The black glass bezel on the black one looks ok but the white bezel on the other colors looks really imbalanced somehow.

And the round icons...wtf? Why? I guess it's because they don't want people expecting this to be a real mini version of the Touch that could run regular apps or something. But it just looks....not quite Apple.

The whole design just lacks clarity and confidence. I really want to...want this thing, but I can't quite bring myself to.
it's all around the strangest apple device ever. the previous nano was awesome. i expected some kind of wifi radio announcement, but nope
Yr Blues is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 13, 2012, 12:30 AM   #9
kaielement
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
yes loved he 6th gen Nano so sad to see it change so much
__________________
2012 11" MacBook Air, 2007 White MacBook, 16gb iPhone 5, 16gb iPhone 5s, 32gb iPad Air, 160gb iPod Classic, 8gb 6th Gen Nano, 20gb 2nd Gen iPod, 40gb 3rd Gen iPod, Moto X 16gb
kaielement is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 17, 2012, 09:42 PM   #10
myrtlebee
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yr Blues View Post
it's all around the strangest apple device ever. the previous nano was awesome. i expected some kind of wifi radio announcement, but nope
This is exactly what I was hoping for too... and it's also the exact, and the only, reason (okay, the hideous UI also helped fend off any temptation I had) I just purchased a $149 refurbished 4th gen iPod Touch from Apple over this thing at the same price. I wanted wifi radio options in a small device with music and preferably video. Oh well. I do suggest, however, that anyone considering purchasing the new Nano think about getting a $149 iPod Touch instead seeing as it does everything and more, just being bigger in size.
myrtlebee is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2012, 01:06 AM   #11
dontpannic
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Orpington, Kent, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by andymann View Post
I don't see Apple throwing away all the R&D they spent turning the nano into a watch.
They didn't. They released an iPod nano. Third parties made the watch strap cases.
dontpannic is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2012, 09:44 AM   #12
andymann
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by dontpannic View Post
They didn't. They released an iPod nano. Third parties made the watch strap cases.
Yes, but apple made that suggestion as well as making all the watch-faces for it they obviously pushed it in that direction for a purpose.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jessica Lares View Post
You can't do that with a device like that. That is why the LiveView and Smartwatch have issues. How is the NFC and Bluetooth supposed to work if it's at the back of the watch where your wrist is covering them?
Apple is the kind of company that can make it work. And just because those 2 watches have the chips on the back, doesn't mean an apple watch would. If I was a betting man, I'd put my money that there's at least a team within apple working on a prototype like this.
andymann is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2012, 10:12 AM   #13
student_trap
macrumors 68000
 
student_trap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 'Ol Smokey, UK
I always found the 6th gen a bit awkward, I thought the 5th gen marked the pinacle of nano design, just wish they had given it a 32gb option.

Looking forward to handling the new one though
__________________
Mac Pro 2.8 Octo and macbook 2.13
Too many iPods
Too few ears
student_trap is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2012, 10:46 AM   #14
dontpannic
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Orpington, Kent, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by andymann View Post
Yes, but apple made that suggestion as well as making all the watch-faces for it they obviously pushed it in that direction for a purpose.
Yes, they created more watch faces for it during a mid cycle software update, after third party companies created watch straps for them. I can't remember what keynote it was but it wasn't the nano announcement, I think it might have been 'back to the mac'.
dontpannic is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2012, 11:04 PM   #15
midwestfisherma
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Well the good news is, there's still time to go out and buy up a 6th gen or two!
midwestfisherma is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 19, 2012, 07:16 AM   #16
iEvolution
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by midwestfisherma View Post
Well the good news is, there's still time to go out and buy up a 6th gen or two!
Hell I just picked up a new factory sealed 5th gen for 220 on Amazon, Im sure there will be plenty of 6th gens around for years to come.

Another thing I don't understand is the dropping of the 8gb model, it was the middle man between the shuffle and 16gb nano, now instead of that middle man people go from 50 shuffle to 150 nano to all the way to 300 for the touch. They really screwed up the pricing scheme this generation.
iEvolution is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 20, 2012, 02:54 AM   #17
midwestfisherma
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by iEvolution View Post
Hell I just picked up a new factory sealed 5th gen for 220 on Amazon, Im sure there will be plenty of 6th gens around for years to come.

Another thing I don't understand is the dropping of the 8gb model, it was the middle man between the shuffle and 16gb nano, now instead of that middle man people go from 50 shuffle to 150 nano to all the way to 300 for the touch. They really screwed up the pricing scheme this generation.
Actually, I agree on the pricing, I think something in the $100 range would be a nice option to still have.
midwestfisherma is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 20, 2012, 03:02 AM   #18
musicpenguy
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
The size of the old nano was anything but perfect.

Lists were unmanageable - the text is both bigger and the screen is smaller than any other nano. Put simply it was bad at finding the songs you wanted.

Holding the actual device was awkward. There was not a good way to hold it - it was a device that was meant to be clipped on or strapped in a watch band.

As a watch it was novel, but the iPod is not a watch it is a music player. I really am happy Apple is returning to that focus on music. The new nano will be incredible. We finally have wireless audio, a nice big screen and lots of other great things to look forward to - I own every iPod nano and am really looking forward to receiving my 7th generation nano.
__________________
(2006: 17" MBP, Rev A: MBA Sold), 2009 Mac Mini, MBA 1.4GHz, 2GB, 128GB, 11" - iPad 64GB 3G, eMate 300, MP2100, 2G 8GB iPhone, 3G 16GB iPhone, 3G&6G Nano, 2G Shuffle, 160GB TV, TV-V2 - TPPN.TV
musicpenguy is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 19, 2012, 10:16 AM   #19
IO01
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yr Blues View Post
The 6th gen was the perfect size
I disagree. I thought the 4th/5th generation was the best size. I got a 6th generation when I sent in my original Nano for that replacement program last year, and I promptly sold it.
IO01 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 19, 2012, 09:05 PM   #20
TacticalDesire
macrumors 68000
 
TacticalDesire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Michigan
Am I the only one who despised the 6th gen? It was WAYY too tiny. Way to small for a touch screen. The 7th gen is more of a nano than the 6th gen ever was.
TacticalDesire is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 11, 2012, 03:32 PM   #21
iLLUMI
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
6th Gen Nano - Best gym iPod ever!! :)

I dove for the 6th gen as soon as it was released because my iPod Shuffle was becoming a pain to navigate and as I listen to a lot of podcasts, if I accidentally skipped to the next track it meant having to navigate back then pressing the forward button to get to where I was at. Painful!! With the Nano you can see where you're at always and easily navigate it.
So to me the 6th gen Nano was almost like an evolution of the Shuffle. It was everything I could have hoped for for the Shuffle. It was the perfect size and design (with the clip) which was (is) perfect for the gym.

I think Apple should do away with the Shuffle and bring back the 6th gen Nano. They could relaunch it as a new product altogether, perhaps call it the 'iPod N6' or the 'iPod Fit' and they could even market it as the 'Nano ReShuffled'.d
iLLUMI is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 12, 2012, 05:28 PM   #22
Scipod
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
I have been the owner of a ton of nanos, touches and classics, while the touch is good for everytHing, classic is best for music, the nano still has a place... The 3rd gen nano had by far the best form factor but the 5th beats every other nano because of many things, thin, camera, click wheel, radio
Scipod is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2012, 07:54 PM   #23
spork183
macrumors 6502a
 
spork183's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scipod View Post
the 5th beats every other nano because of many things, thin, camera, click wheel, radio
gotta agree with you. Don't know what I'll do when my 16gb 5th gen dies, cuz the new nano doesn't float my boat...
__________________
"I'll buy almost anything if it's shiny and made by Apple..."
-Macbook Wheel Ad
spork183 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2012, 08:29 PM   #24
JBazz
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Of all the iPods I know own and use, the 6th gen Nano is by far the most used. Well, maybe the Classic is up there because it is used in my car.

I loved the 6th and kept on on my badge holder at work. I was never without an audiobook or tunes. Never had any issues with its functionality or size.

Now my 5th gen Nano has had to have the curved glass replaced twice. I had to stop carrying it around. The curved glass was a flawed design.
__________________
JBazz is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2012, 07:47 PM   #25
TacticalDesire
macrumors 68000
 
TacticalDesire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Michigan
I found it way too small to do much of anything on. Navigation was a joke. Liking the 7th gen much better. It seems to be going back towards the Nanos roots.
TacticalDesire is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPod

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC