|Nov 14, 2012, 02:44 PM||#1|
I'm very inclined to go for the mac mini over the iMac
I have been waiting for the iMac since Nov 2011, and after the long wait, I found the update very disappointing because (for the iMac 21"):
- No firewire (I wouldn't mind FW 800 only, but nothing?), I don't want another adapter
- No audio input (why??)
- Sub-par HDD (5400rpm, why?), the SSD is too small, and fusion doesn't convince me and it is more expensive than a standard 7200 HDD and an extra SSD
- Not user upgradeable (so no chance to save some more and in the future upgrade by myself the RAM and HDD or add an extra SSD). This is one of the main points for my upcoming decision, I'm not going to pay almost 4 times what I can get at Crucial, or changing the HDD in the future isn't possible.
- All in one, the screen could get damaged and the all unit has to be sent for repair, or the opposite, the motherboard could die and the screen could be rendered useless.
Looking at all these, and I never even payed much attention to the mac mini, I started to look at it and what I really like:
- user upgradeable (I can get 16GB of RAM for about 80 EUR, and at Apple they charge 300 EUR and don't even give me the original 4 GB); I can change the HDD, or even swap it with another HDD or SSD.
- I can add another HDD or SSD!
- it has firewire
- it has an audio input
- comes with the adapter for a DVI monitor, I can plug it already to my monitor
I'm inclined to ditch the iMac purchase and go for the mac mini (i7 2.6GHz), the only doubt is if it will perform as well as the iMac, the advantages of the iMac for me are:
- nice screen (I do have a nice one already and will probably buy another one, but nothing compared to the one on the iMac)
- dedicated graphics card
- more powerful (?)
Will the mac mini perform as well? User upgradeability is important for me, and also the silence and temperature, I don't know if the mac mini is silent or warm/hot...
Is this a good idea? I mean, Apple could listen to the consumer (cough, cough) and maybe release an updated iMac with a proper HDD and user upgradeable RAM, chance to add an extra HDD or SSD (let me dream, ok?)
Your input will be helpful, thanks!
|Nov 14, 2012, 02:47 PM||#2|
IMO it's a GREAT idea. Despite the integrated display, the Mini is a better value purchase.
Last edited by diazj3; Nov 14, 2012 at 02:59 PM.
|Nov 14, 2012, 03:00 PM||#3|
Depends what you're using it for really.
Focusing on the graphics, the Intel HD 4000 will suffice for many people, but if you're doing video editing or gaming, you'd be much better off getting a computer with a dedicated card, like the iMac.
The points you listed are agreeable, but bear in mind that the iMac has two Thunderbolt ports over a FireWire and Thunderbolt port, and you can get an adapter for FireWire to Thunderbolt. I know you said you don't want to fiddle with another adapter, but the one from Apple is very short, it's not a big deal. I bought one and it's perfectly adequate.
I think the headphone port doubles as audio in...at least it should do...bit stupid to leave it out.
Go for what you feel is best, if you need a dedicated graphics card, go for the iMac. At the end of the day, I think the Mac mini is going to be cheaper, but you're not going to have as good specs.
|Nov 14, 2012, 07:07 PM||#4|
I was looking at doing this myself but want the good and lightweight screen that comes with the iMac. It will cost less to get the that i7 2.6, with fusion and 16 gig of RAM (especially if you do that yourself) than the 21.5 iMac that allows fusion. For me the iMac seems to be winning. I am going to wait for the teardown to make a final decision. Now that my mid 2007 (running Snow Leopard) has 4gig of ram, I can hold off a bit.
If you have not been following the threads over in the mini section, you might want to take a look. There are apparently known issues with the HD4000 graphics. Apparently Intel is having trouble fixing.
|Nov 15, 2012, 05:39 AM||#5|
What really makes me go away from the iMac is the fact that if I want to upgrade it, it should be done at the time of purchase, and I will have to pay premium. Also the HDD or Fusion option (nevermind the small SDD), I really would prefer a HDD and a separate SSD, if they removed the ODD why not use the space?
And the price, that is the most important here, the iMac became more expensive and its much more expensive than the Mac Mini (I do have a monitor, so that could be a plus for the Mini).
Aditionaly, the lack of FW, not such a big deal, but that means I would have to spend more money on an adapter (all my backups are done on external FW drives).
The audio input I doubt the single connection on the iMac serves both ways, really strange move from Apple, I wonder why they did that? That isn't a big deal, but it will make have to get another adapter, more money, more rubish on the desk.
Finally, the time of purchase, I would like to take advantage of the black friday discounts (not from Apple apparently, but other vendors can discount the Mac Mini), and finally the release of the iMac, because if it rocks I may consider getting it. Decisions, I wish I had more money to spend on the Mac.
I think the main concern for me is to know if the graphic card will stand for the work I do with it. I believe I can return it if I don't like it, correct?
EDIT: I just read the iMac may be delayed to the start of 2013, that is a big weight on anyones' decision, you can't buy something that isn't available.
Last edited by madrag; Nov 15, 2012 at 05:44 AM.
|Nov 15, 2012, 05:49 AM||#6|
world's largest manufacturer of tin foil hats, none of that aluminum foil crap.
|Nov 15, 2012, 06:23 AM||#7|
I use two monitors, 1280x1024 (4x3 ratio), so I will have to get an adapter for the second monitor, I suppose the Mini will stand both monitors without much lag?
For the software I do have CS4 but will have to go for open source or cheaper, money is really an issue right now, that's why the Mini feels like the better purchase right now. And if the iMac gets delayed as rumoured, this may suffice.
I plan to get the 16GB of RAM very soon after the purchase I know it will make a nice diference, and add an extra SSD along the way (not right now), the 5400rpm is sad, (not that slow, because I've used a 5400 on a MBP, but still not as fast as a 7200rpm HDD). A SSD is never a bad drive to have, I think most will agree, I just can't stand the idea of an SSD only setup (unless it would be one of those 700MB ultra-expensive drive).
Indeed I will probably buy at Apple or somewhere where they accept returns, either for the iMac or the Mac Mini.
Is the Mini silent and not very hot?
|Nov 18, 2012, 12:57 AM||#9|
It seems like NO ONE is paying attention to my countless posts of lack of a GPU in the Mac Mini......
To put things in perspective the GPu in the base model 2011 iMac is 3x faster..... 3x faster, do you have any idea how much that is?
I bought a 2012 Mac mini with 2.6 i7 and 16gb Ram and I couldn't use it for Hd video editing and effects. Also the stock 5400rpm hard drive was slower then the stock 7200rpm hard drive in my iMac.
Yes you can upgrade the hard drive so that would be better but as far as I know, there is simply no way to add a gpu to the Mac mini.
A processor is not everything.......
|Nov 15, 2012, 07:20 AM||#10|
Second, w.r.t. what you mentioned, I think thunderbolt and USB3.0 are enough for any kind of input. USB3.0 can be used as an audio input. The real trick component I think is the Fusion Drive. It is a good way to bypass the expensive pure SSD and the low-speed HDD. It has convinced me as a good option for large and fast storage, even though it will cost around extra $250.
The idea 'all in one' itself is very attractive to me, since it helps me to get a power desktop and me to maintain a clean, simple and beautiful working room.
I would not compare any Mac product with PC. If your wish is a power game center, the PC, Xbox, etc., are all better options. Mac is rather a personal addiction which maintains the pursue of simple and nice computer culture.
|Nov 16, 2012, 08:03 AM||#11|
I also have a 2007 Mac Mini. I was looking at Apple TV to use as a music server, but thought the Mac Mini would do a better job. That Mini is still going strong and has not had a single problem, either. It is hooked up to a 50" plasma through a VGA port. We can use the included remote to select songs through iTunes and use it as a jukebox.
I've been waiting for the iMac to get the nice display and do a little bit of gaming, but I am a little worried about quality at this point. I don't really need a new computer.
|Nov 20, 2012, 07:05 AM||#12|
Doesn't look as nice as Apples screen, but at least it's non-glossy.
|Nov 30, 2012, 10:36 AM||#14|
Today I decided in favour of the Mac Mini, i7 2.6GHz, ordered 16GB of RAM from Crucial yesterday (68 EUR with tax, I got 10% discount yesterday!).
Just placed my order and am waiting for my Mini to arrive (ETA 13th of Dec.).
What weighted more was user upgradeability.
As for the performance, as I can see compared to the iMac, it isn't much lesser, so I'm happy
SSD is next.
If you decide for the iMac, good for you!, for me the wait is (almost) over
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Mac mini vs Mac Pro vs iMac||macnoob222||Buying Tips and Advice||12||Apr 2, 2013 08:43 PM|
|Thunderbolt Mac Mini to Mini DisplayPort iMac 27" cable?||keogh||Mac mini||5||Jan 11, 2013 06:57 AM|
|Mac Mini vs IMac confusion..First Time Mac Buyer||MacMiniBuyer||Mac mini||13||Dec 22, 2012 07:53 PM|
|Mac Pro vs Mac Mini Vs iMac?||macstevie9||Mac Pro||14||Dec 6, 2012 10:17 AM|
|MacRumors Roundups for iPad Mini, 13-Inch Retina MacBook Pro, iMac, Mac Mini||MacRumors||MacRumors.com News Discussion||56||Oct 23, 2012 10:38 AM|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 AM.