Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Systems and Services > OS X > Mac OS X Server, Xserve, and Networking

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 19, 2012, 10:26 PM   #1
ghboard2010
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Dont look now, I'm right behind you
A network question. . . (or two)

Whatever in the world happened to 'Jumbo Frames' and what good or bad were they?
__________________
A bunch 'o' Mac confuzers
ghboard2010 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 20, 2012, 06:16 AM   #2
Les Kern
macrumors 68030
 
Les Kern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alabama
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghboard2010 View Post
Whatever in the world happened to 'Jumbo Frames' and what good or bad were they?
You know, in a perfect world that technology would be great, but in the real world with our blistering low-bandwidth, half-assed internet infrastructure not so much. And imagine the config issues both internally and externally. Nah. (I am assuming you're talking about network technology right? And not The Jumbo Frames , the pro wrestling twins from the 60's?)
Les Kern is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2012, 12:46 PM   #3
assembled
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London
Jumbo Frames are only usable in a LAN environment where all nodes (including switches) support them.

As the frame is larger than normal, although you have the same amount of overhead per frame, because there is more payload per frame, your total overhead goes down compared to the same amount of data transferred with 1500 byte frames.
assembled is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2012, 02:46 PM   #4
Ap0ks
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghboard2010 View Post
Whatever in the world happened to 'Jumbo Frames' and what good or bad were they?
They're used extensively in storage networks and quite possibly a lot of backhaul connections utilise them. As assembled pointed out both ends of the connection have to support the increased frame size which makes them less appealing to general LAN networks and home internet connections.
Ap0ks is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2012, 02:16 AM   #5
ghboard2010
Thread Starter
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Dont look now, I'm right behind you
Ok I understand. . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ap0ks View Post
They're used extensively in storage networks and quite possibly a lot of backhaul connections utilise them. As assembled pointed out both ends of the connection have to support the increased frame size which makes them less appealing to general LAN networks and home internet connections.
Too bad; I've got a 2006 Mac Mini Core Duo which support(ed) Jumbos, or at least my memory leads to think this is the case.

I did however notice the wife's iMac{April 2008} shows this:
Marvell Yukon Gigabit Adapter 88E8055 Singleport Copper SA:
in the the system profile.

I think that old Mac Mini of mine had the same chip IIRC. I seem to recall Mac OSX dropped the Jumbos in 10.5 Leopard{again IIRC}. Also my iMac(Late 2009) uses a Broadcom chip which I understand also does not support Jumbos. So it looks like both hardware and software have evolved on the client-side to not use Jumbos. Oh well. . .
__________________
A bunch 'o' Mac confuzers
ghboard2010 is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Systems and Services > OS X > Mac OS X Server, Xserve, and Networking

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Home network question MacKenzie999 Mac OS X Server, Xserve, and Networking 3 Sep 3, 2013 08:15 PM
Network Speed Question IPadNParadise Mac Basics and Help 6 Feb 2, 2013 08:52 AM
Network Speed Question johngrussell MacBook Pro 6 Dec 27, 2012 10:39 AM
iMessage network question jackryan57 iPhone 2 Sep 18, 2012 06:21 PM
Network Question brentg33 Mac Basics and Help 4 Aug 1, 2012 10:16 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC