Mac Utility Bundle: Parallels 8, Snagit, Rubbernet, VirusBarrier, MacOptimizer for $59.99

[MacRumors]

Just ahead of Black Friday 2012, StackSocial has launched their Mac Utility Bundle which includes 5 Mac Apps for $59.99. The total retail value for the included apps are $245. The apps include

- Parallels Desktop 8 ($80) - Run Windows on your Mac
- Snagit ($50) - Record screen videos
- VirusBarrier X6 ($50) - Virus protection
- MacOptimizer ($29) - Disk utility
- Rubbernet ($36) - Monitor network-enabled apps

The $59.99 price represents a discount on full price of Parallels Desktop 8, but also includes these other apps. Meanwhile, Parallels seems to be offering their own discount to the same $59.99 but on their one app alone.

MacRumors is an affiliate partner of StackSocial.

Article Link: Mac Utility Bundle: Parallels 8, Snagit, Rubbernet, VirusBarrier, MacOptimizer for $59.99

[macingman]

Very nice. Will be buying, love the bundles that come out this time of year.

[blevins321]

I've used Snagit on work PCs for years. It's a really incredible program. I might have to shoot for this deal. Parallels and Snagit make it worth it :-)

[WissMAN]

SnagIt is great. Not sure on the virus protection.

[Razeus]

too bad I can upgrade to Parallels 8, the only app I'd want, for much cheaper.

[Zedcars]

Too bad - I just bought Parallels 8

[bmunge]

Nice deal. Has anyone used rubbernet? Is it like little snitch?

[camnchar]

I'm in the market for Parallels, so I'm taking the plunge. The other software, not so much.

[Colpeas]

As with all such bundles, it contains only one useful app.

[dukebound85]

Parallels---------Virtual Box
Snagit------------Built in with QT or an app like Jing
VirusBarrier-----ClamXav
MacOptimizer----Onyx
Rubbernet--------PrivateEye

Not sure why one would pay for these when the ones I listed are FREE alternatives

[coolspot18]

Originally Posted by dukebound85

Parallels---------Virtual Box

Not sure why one would pay for these when the ones I listed are FREE alternatives

Parallels has a much better graphics support; some apps don't work in Virtual Box (i.e. My CCTV DVR software). Parallels is also faster.

VirtualBox can probably work for the majority of people, but unfortunately I must use Parallels

[msandersen]

Originally Posted by dukebound85

Parallels---------Virtual Box
Snagit------------Built in with QT or an app like Jing
VirusBarrier-----ClamXav
MacOptimizer----Onyx
Rubbernet--------PrivateEye

Not sure why one would pay for these when the ones I listed are FREE alternatives

1. As people mentioned, Virtual Box is not a match for Parallels.
2. I'm not interested in AV, though I have the free Sophos AV for on-demand scanning of downloaded or suspect files, I don't care of always-on scanning if I can help it like we need for our PCs; it may yet come to that in the future, but we're not there yet thankfully.
But seriously, ClamXav? It's the worst of the lot, sadly. You can argue it is worse than no AV, since it gives you a false sense of security, esp on the Mac, as it doesn't really do Mac viruses. I deliberately downloaded a copy of the iWork trojan to test against when it came out, which is a long time ago now, and to this day Clam fails to detect it. All other AVs I've tested, inc on the PC, detect it.

[blevins321]

Originally Posted by dukebound85

Parallels---------Virtual Box
Snagit------------Built in with QT or an app like Jing
VirusBarrier-----ClamXav
MacOptimizer----Onyx
Rubbernet--------PrivateEye

Not sure why one would pay for these when the ones I listed are FREE alternatives

Parallels is much more optimized than Virtualbox is. I've noticed it run much faster for memory intensive programs. It also has quite a few integration features.

And Snagit has so many options it borders on stupid. Built in editing, conversion, and a ton of capture options.

[blevins321]

Originally Posted by palmharbor

I bought Parallels yesterday from Newegg. It came on a thumb drive WITHOUT AN ACTIVATION CODE. I called Parallels emailed them my receipt and it wasn't good enough. It took me fifty minutes on the phone to get
an activation code.
I installed it and am trying to install WIN 7 from a disk image as I bought it on line. This is said to be okay and its been 75 minutes and it is still trying to install. Something is wrong but after 25 minutes on hold they say give me your telephone and we will call U back.
This company disrespects it customers and the software has not improved since Parallels 4 years ago.
I would avoid this product like the plague.

You bought Parallels 7 yesterday with one day shipping from Newegg? 8 has been out for a few months...

[palmharbor]

Originally Posted by blevins321

You bought Parallels 7 yesterday with one day shipping from Newegg? 8 has been out for a few months...

The Parallels 7 updated on my mac to Parallels 8 after I installed it on my new MacMini. What are you trying to say? Look, if you want to buy it and struggle with it..go right ahead.

----------

Originally Posted by SteelWheel

I'm reasonably certain that "palmharbor" is using Parallels 7 as well; Parallels 8 has "built-in" (= certified to be legit downloads) guest OSes. I was just looking at a review of this in one of the Mac magazines the other day. IIRC, a user can easily get a copy of Windows 7 or 8, the "off-the-shelf" version of the latest Ubuntu distro, Chrome OS (although: Why?), Android, or Mountain Lion from your recovery partition, as a part of the process of installing Parallels itself. Why bother installing a separately purchased version of Windows? All you really need is the license key. It's been a while since I've installed Windows on a machine, but in general, you just enter the license key at the prompt. I'm not even sure why Parallels customer support is supposed to be your first resort on a problem installing Windows. If I had that problem, I'd be calling Redmond, I think..

When U install Parallels 7, it updates after installation to Parallels 8. Keep in mind with out a Windows OS...XP, 7 Disk etc,
it is useless. I downloaded WIN 7 as a disk image and it would not install after 85 minutes, called TechSupport for Parallels and they had NO answer but said, quit and install a preview of WIN 8. I.E. on Win 8 had no way to save a favorite. I will buy a second copy of WIN 7 on a disk. I just think it should have been included.
Only reason I got Parallels is to use Internet Explorer as some job application
websites such as TALEO et al are for I.E. and Firefox,Safari,Chrome, Camino do not
work the same and makes it impossible to apply for some jobs, especially the Federal
govt. website. As much as Mac users dislike it, its a Windows World...I.E. has certain parts of it that Apple has no access to or others.,,I have filled out extensive applications only to get to the end to see the "submit" button missing...On. I.E. that is not the case.

[Comeagain?]

Originally Posted by blevins321

You bought Parallels 7 yesterday with one day shipping from Newegg? 8 has been out for a few months...

He didn't say Parallels 7, he said Windows 7.

[blevins321]

Originally Posted by Comeagain?

He didn't say Parallels 7, he said Windows 7.

Picture is Parallels 7.

[SteelWheel]

I'm reasonably certain that "palmharbor" is using Parallels 7 as well; Parallels 8 has "built-in" (= certified to be legit downloads) guest OSes. I was just looking at a review of this in one of the Mac magazines the other day. IIRC, a user can easily get a copy of Windows 7 or 8, the "off-the-shelf" version of the latest Ubuntu distro, Chrome OS (although: Why?), Android, or Mountain Lion from your recovery partition, as a part of the process of installing Parallels itself. Why bother installing a separately purchased version of Windows? All you really need is the license key. It's been a while since I've installed Windows on a machine, but in general, you just enter the license key at the prompt. I'm not even sure why Parallels customer support is supposed to be your first resort on a problem installing Windows. If I had that problem, I'd be calling Redmond, I think..

[iSee]

Oh, ok, so: Parallels 8 for $60. Not too bad.

Originally Posted by palmharbor

I bought Parallels yesterday from Newegg. It came on a thumb drive WITHOUT AN ACTIVATION CODE. I called Parallels emailed them my receipt and it wasn't good enough. It took me fifty minutes on the phone to get
an activation code.
I installed it and am trying to install WIN 7 from a disk image as I bought it on line. This is said to be okay and its been 75 minutes and it is still trying to install. Something is wrong but after 25 minutes on hold they say give me your telephone and we will call U back.
This company disrespects it customers and the software has not improved since Parallels 4 years ago.
I would avoid this product like the plague.

Your activation problems are with Newegg, not Parallels -- think rationally for even one second and you can see that. Geeze, I'm not a big Parallels fan, but your criticism is wholly misdirected in this case. And, by the way, a disk image should work fine. But given your lack of critical thinking skills, I'd be willing to bet this is user error. God only know who you "bought" that windows 7 disk image from. (I'm thinking from microsoft.com.ru).

[pennant]

Originally Posted by iSee

Oh, ok, so: Parallels 8 for $60. Not too bad.





Your activation problems are with Newegg, not Parallels -- think rationally for even one second and you can see that. Geeze, I'm not a big Parallels fan, but your criticism is wholly misdirected in this case. And, by the way, a disk image should work fine. But given your lack of critical thinking skills, I'd be willing to bet this is user error. God only know who you "bought" that windows 7 disk image from. (I'm thinking from microsoft.com.ru).

I have also experienced promlems using Parallels 8, although I did manage to install Windows 7 without difficulty. But the main complaint is that some of the Windows based programmes do not function properly when running under Parallels. You would think that if you loaded the same Windows 7 software into Parallels as was installed in a PC, the Windows application programmes should behave the same way, but they simply do not!

I think the main problem is that the Mac system preferences kick-in and over-ride the system settings on Windows 7. I also found difficulty to access data files on the Mac while using Windows 7 under parallels and the only way to achieve proper functionality seemed to be to copy files from Finder folders to the Virtual C:/ drive under Parallels. But of course you then end up with two versions of the same file under different folders.

From now on if I want to use Windows programmes, I will do so on a PC and not try to have dual functionality on a Mac. It is a frustrating exercise trying to get the Mac to perform as a PC !!