Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 28, 2012, 09:32 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Google Updates Chrome for iOS with Passbook Support




Google has updated their Chrome for iOS mobile web browser with Passbook support, the ability to open PDFs in other apps and more.

Quote:
What's New in Version 23.0.1271.91
- Open PDFs in other apps
- Save your boarding passes and tickets with Passbook
- Seeing garbled characters? Turn on text encoding detection in settings.
- Stability and security improvements
- Many bug fixes
The browser will prompt the user to add a ticket or boarding pass to Passbook if the site supports Passbook and .pkpass file types. Chrome for iOS is the mobile version of their full featured Google Chrome web browser for desktops and is available for free for both iPad and iPhone in the App Store. [Direct Link]

Article Link: Google Updates Chrome for iOS with Passbook Support
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2012, 09:44 PM   #2
adcx64
macrumors 65816
 
adcx64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cudi Zone
Keeps getting better. Now if only Apple would let the 3rd party apps get the same version of WebKit as safari so it's on par with speed.
adcx64 is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2012, 10:09 PM   #3
ZacNicholson
macrumors 6502a
 
ZacNicholson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Indiana
Send a message via Skype™ to ZacNicholson
wow i haven't used passbook or chrome on iOS. but i might now
__________________
follow me on twitter @zac_nicholson
watch my youtube www.youtube.com/mrzacnicholson
2011 13" MBP, iPhone 4 (jailbroken), iPad 3 32 GB Verizon(jailbroken), Apple tv 2(jailbroken)
ZacNicholson is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2012, 10:26 PM   #4
Prodo123
macrumors 68020
 
Prodo123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Yeah, a lot more people use the YouTube app than Chrome.
Update that first please.
__________________
MacBook Pro 15" 2.2Ghz hi-res glossy, 16GB RAM, Logitech G700, Das Keyboard, Seagate Momentus XT 750GB iPhone 5 White 32GB Audiophile Photographer, videographer, audio engineer
Prodo123 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 12:30 AM   #5
a0me
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prodo123 View Post
Yeah, a lot more people use the YouTube app than Chrome.
Update that first please.
Nope, a lot more people use the Chrome app than the YouTube app.
The YouTube app still doesn't support AirPlay or the iPad, why would anyone want to use that?
__________________
iMac 24"; MacBook Pro 15"; iPhone 4; iPhone 5s; iPod touch; tv
a0me is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 06:13 PM   #6
Prodo123
macrumors 68020
 
Prodo123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by a0me View Post
Nope, a lot more people use the Chrome app than the YouTube app.
The YouTube app still doesn't support AirPlay or the iPad, why would anyone want to use that?
Touché!
__________________
MacBook Pro 15" 2.2Ghz hi-res glossy, 16GB RAM, Logitech G700, Das Keyboard, Seagate Momentus XT 750GB iPhone 5 White 32GB Audiophile Photographer, videographer, audio engineer
Prodo123 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2012, 10:31 PM   #7
jacjustjac
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Chrome and iPad

I only use Safari on my Mac and iPad, so I persuaded my girlfriend to switch to Chrome on her Mac and also use Chrome on my iPad. Now we can both enjoy cloud synced bookmarks and tabs without overriding each other's open pages! Maybe someday will add user accounts to the iPad but until then we're just fine sharing one.
jacjustjac is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 09:04 AM   #8
KdParker
macrumors 68030
 
KdParker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacjustjac View Post
I only use Safari on my Mac and iPad, so I persuaded my girlfriend to switch to Chrome on her Mac and also use Chrome on my iPad. Now we can both enjoy cloud synced bookmarks and tabs without overriding each other's open pages! Maybe someday will add user accounts to the iPad but until then we're just fine sharing one.
Sounds like you need second iPad or power book.
__________________
16g iPhone5s Space Grey; 16g iPhone5 White;
15" retina - MBP 2.6 GHZ 16 RAM;
iPad4 retina
KdParker is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 09:30 AM   #9
Quu
macrumors 65816
 
Quu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
I'd use Safari instead if I could easily sync my bookmarks with my iPhone & iPad from Chrome on my PC & Mac.

I know it is easy if you're using Safari everything but Safari's plugin/extension support is rubbish compared to Chromes and I make use of quite a lot of plugins.

I wish we had a universal syncing standard for this stuff that all the browser makers would use but alas that ain't gonna happen.
__________________
Notebook: 17" C2D MBP, 2.93GHz, 4GB RAM, SSD+HDD, Mavericks
Desktop: Three 30", Ci7 3930K, OS X Mavericks, 32GB RAM, 2xGTX780 SLI, 840 Pro SSD
iOS Devices: iPhone 5 64GB | iPad Air 16GB WiFi
Quu is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2012, 10:33 PM   #10
mrsir2009
macrumors 604
 
mrsir2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by adcx64 View Post
Keeps getting better. Now if only Apple would let the 3rd party apps get the same version of WebKit as safari so it's on par with speed.
There's a Jailbreak tweak for that
mrsir2009 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2012, 11:31 PM   #11
maxwelltech
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Irvine, CA, USA
Now I just need to find a way to sync opened pages between Safari and Chrome.
__________________
Hackintosh w/ i7-4770K, 16GB RAM, 2x120GB SSDs, 1TB HDD, GTX 760; MacBook Pro 13 i7 (Mid 2012) w/ 240GB SSD; iPad 4 WiFi 32GB; HTC One 32GB AT&T
maxwelltech is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 12:08 AM   #12
spyguy10709
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: One Infinite Loop, Cupertino CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by adcx64 View Post
Keeps getting better. Now if only Apple would let the 3rd party apps get the same version of WebKit as safari so it's on par with speed.
You know - it's things like this that make me... sad.

Chrome is on the same open source version of WebKit that Apple has funded for the past 10 years.

It doesn't have the nitro engine, which Apple spent hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars developing - for Safari, not WebKit.

Freeloaders like Google should write their own engine for the app, not ask Apple to give them theirs for free.
spyguy10709 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 12:21 AM   #13
VPrime
macrumors 65832
 
VPrime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: London Ontario
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy10709 View Post
You know - it's things like this that make me... sad.

Chrome is on the same open source version of WebKit that Apple has funded for the past 10 years.

It doesn't have the nitro engine, which Apple spent hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars developing - for Safari, not WebKit.

Freeloaders like Google should write their own engine for the app, not ask Apple to give them theirs for free.
Except this is against apples developer guidelines.
Users must use the built in Webkit UI Webview for any apps that want to display a website.
Unfortunately this does not include the nitro enhancements.

Google and almost every developer ever would LOVE to be able to use their own web renderer in iOS. But they cant.
__________________
@MurtazaSaadat
VPrime is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 11:22 AM   #14
spyguy10709
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: One Infinite Loop, Cupertino CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by VPrime View Post
Except this is against apples developer guidelines.
Users must use the built in Webkit UI Webview for any apps that want to display a website.
Unfortunately this does not include the nitro enhancements.

Google and almost every developer ever would LOVE to be able to use their own web renderer in iOS. But they cant.
Hello? Opera Mini anyone?
It's that if you want to use the WebKit engine that's included you need to. Trust me, I'm a dev - they changed that in the 5.1 SDK update.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by KnightWRX View Post
3 things :

- WebKit is not an Apple project. It was originally known as KHTML/KJS, a LGPL'ed HTML/Javascript engine made by the KDE project. Apple forked the code base around version 3.0.2 and renamed it WebKit (yes, KHTML/KJS was already pretty advanced, and was powering what I considered the best browser at the time, Konqueror).

- Google surpassed Apple for Webkit commits around 2010. Also, the Webkit team is not "funded by Apple", it's quite evenly distributed with even outsiders.

- Google has their own Javascript engine in the desktop version of Chrome : V8. Apple doesn't allow 3rd party Javascript/HTML rendering engines in the App store, otherwise I'm pretty sure Google would simply incorporate V8 and let Apple have its little fun time with Nitro on its own. As it stands, Apple is artificially limiting competition in the Browser arena on iOS.

So maybe your vitriol is misplaced here. It is apparently quite ignorant of the reality behind WebKit, the App Store model and development in general too.

The more you know.[COLOR="#808080"]
WebKit only survived becuase apple threw tons of cash at it. There's a reason why the WebKit project uses a Safari icon... Google passed Apple in commits on the "IE Compatibility Crusade" a few years ago.

Unlike Apple which commits bundles, Google commits every time they change a few lines. I've been auditing WebKit a little bit here and there... I know.
Much more % of code, I'm sure, has been done from Apple's coders.

Apple does allow 3rd party rendering engines now - but they can't use BOTH the BUILT IN WebKit and a 3rd party engine. (If they included V8 compiled, that would be Okay) Look at Opera Mini and many other apps. They officially changed the wording around the 5.1SDK I believe.
And FYI V8 sucks... look at android's chrome performance vs stock webkit (android browser)... Crome does WORSE. WTF.


I could run circles around you in coding, btw... Just saying.

It's apparent that your arrogance is ignorant (not you, just your arrogance) of the possibility that it could possibly be Google's fault.
spyguy10709 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 11:41 AM   #15
KnightWRX
macrumors Pentium
 
KnightWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Quebec, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy10709 View Post
WebKit only survived becuase apple threw tons of cash at it.
Uh ? You haven't been around many open source projects. It has nothing to do with money.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy10709 View Post
Unlike Apple which commits bundles, Google commits every time they change a few lines. I've been auditing WebKit a little bit here and there... I know.
Much more % of code, I'm sure, has been done from Apple's coders.
You just want it to be so. Reality obviously tells a different story. Otherwise, provide sources for your claim.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy10709 View Post
Apple does allow 3rd party rendering engines now - but they can't use BOTH the BUILT IN WebKit and a 3rd party engine. (If they included V8 compiled, that would be Okay) Look at Opera Mini and many other apps.
Opera Mini does not have a Javascript engine nor does it have a HTML rendering engine. Apple absolutely does not allow 3rd parties to implement Javascript/Rendering engines.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy10709 View Post
It's apparent that your arrogance is ignorant (not you, just your arrogance) of the possibility that it could possibly be Google's fault.
Again, you just want it to be Google's fault. The fact remains : Google cannot use anything but UIWebView, so they are stuck with all its limitations (no Nitro, no background thread rendering, etc...). All browsers on iOS are limited this way.

Opera Mini is not a browser per se. It does not fetch and render HTML on your IOS device. I think you need to read up on how Opera Mini works.
__________________
"What you leave behind is not what is engraved in stone monuments, but what is woven into the lives of others."
-- Pericles
KnightWRX is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 05:20 PM   #16
VPrime
macrumors 65832
 
VPrime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: London Ontario
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy10709 View Post
Hello? Opera Mini anyone?
It's that if you want to use the WebKit engine that's included you need to. Trust me, I'm a dev - they changed that in the 5.1 SDK update.
As KingihtWRX said, opera mini does not render HTML or JavaScript. It is very different in the way it works and is not a true browser.
All the work is being handled by operas servers, then interactive images are sent to you.
This is very limiting and most modern and interactive websites will not work with opera mini.
__________________
@MurtazaSaadat
VPrime is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 05:29 AM   #17
KnightWRX
macrumors Pentium
 
KnightWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Quebec, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy10709 View Post
You know - it's things like this that make me... sad.

Chrome is on the same open source version of WebKit that Apple has funded for the past 10 years.

It doesn't have the nitro engine, which Apple spent hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars developing - for Safari, not WebKit.

Freeloaders like Google should write their own engine for the app, not ask Apple to give them theirs for free.
3 things :

- WebKit is not an Apple project. It was originally known as KHTML/KJS, a LGPL'ed HTML/Javascript engine made by the KDE project. Apple forked the code base around version 3.0.2 and renamed it WebKit (yes, KHTML/KJS was already pretty advanced, and was powering what I considered the best browser at the time, Konqueror).

- Google surpassed Apple for Webkit commits around 2010. Also, the Webkit team is not "funded by Apple", it's quite evenly distributed with even outsiders.

- Google has their own Javascript engine in the desktop version of Chrome : V8. Apple doesn't allow 3rd party Javascript/HTML rendering engines in the App store, otherwise I'm pretty sure Google would simply incorporate V8 and let Apple have its little fun time with Nitro on its own. As it stands, Apple is artificially limiting competition in the Browser arena on iOS.

So maybe your vitriol is misplaced here. It is apparently quite ignorant of the reality behind WebKit, the App Store model and development in general too.

The more you know.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by a0me View Post
Nope, a lot more people use the Chrome app than the YouTube app.
The YouTube app still doesn't support AirPlay or the iPad, why would anyone want to use that?
The Youtube is ranked #3 in the App Store this morning, Chrome sits at #57, the free app section.

However, Google does not share's Apple management policies and has such, doesn't have small core teams that they assign to projects based on priorities. Google has a Chrome team, and they have a Youtube team. Both are independant of each other and are not a single entity where work on one project interferes with work on another.

So "update Youtube first" makes no sense. Why should the Chrome team twiddle their thumbs and not provide updates if they can ? Why should they wait for the Youtube team ?
__________________
"What you leave behind is not what is engraved in stone monuments, but what is woven into the lives of others."
-- Pericles
KnightWRX is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 11:47 AM   #18
Mr.damien
Guest
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnightWRX View Post
3 things :

- WebKit is not an Apple project. It was originally known as KHTML/KJS, a LGPL'ed HTML/Javascript engine made by the KDE project. Apple forked the code base around version 3.0.2 and renamed it WebKit (yes, KHTML/KJS was already pretty advanced, and was powering what I considered the best browser at the time, Konqueror).
I like your revisionism.

1. KHTML was not that advanced and was almost dead as Firefox was used and promoted by everybody
2. Apple created Webkit from KHTML and make it easy for everybody to use on the opposite of KHTML which was made specifically for Konqueror and used only ... by KDE people.
3. Konqueror has always been the worst browser ever. That's why any linux user's first task was to install Firefox.
4. And yes, Webkit IS an Apple project. KHTML was indeed not ...

So maybe your vitriol is misplaced here. It is apparently quite ignorant of the reality behind WebKit, the App Store model and development in general too.
  1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 12:06 PM   #19
KnightWRX
macrumors Pentium
 
KnightWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Quebec, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.damien View Post
I like your revisionism.

1. KHTML was not that advanced and was almost dead as Firefox was used and promoted by everybody
2. Apple created Webkit from KHTML and make it easy for everybody to use on the opposite of KHTML which was made specifically for Konqueror and used only ... by KDE people.
3. Konqueror has always been the worst browser ever. That's why any linux user's first task was to install Firefox.
4. And yes, Webkit IS an Apple project. KHTML was indeed not ...
KHTML at the time was one of the engines that had some of the best W3C standard support, an active CSS/HTML roadmap that was easy to follow, and pre-dates Firefox by about 2 orders of magnitudes in time. Firefox came very late, after Mozilla became quite the bloated mess. I know, I used Firefox back when it was called Pheonix (yes, the very first build).

KHTML was also very far from dead. Obviously, you just don't think like open source folks do. It was very much alive, had tons of developer support. I was also very far from being "Konqueror" only as it was used all over KDE, was an integral part of the kdelibs package and was embedded in any application linked against kdelibs, as KDE promoted heavy componentization and object re-use. The same model Apple applies to the design of Cocoa.

And sorry, I was a full blown desktop Linux user... back in the days before KDE 1.0. There was no such thing as Firefox then. You either had the Motif version of Netscape 4.x which had such shoddy CSS support and barely any W3C standards support that it was laughable, or you had Konqueror and KHTML with KDE when it finally came, which was quite nice to work with.

Gecko/Firefox/Mozilla all came quite later and I still stuck to using Konqueror all the time I used Linux full time. I had Firefox installed, but never quite managed to switch to it full time as long as I was using KDE.

Sorry, my history is not revisionist. WebKit was not born out of thin air, Apple used an open source project. I don't know why both you and spyguy want to bash Google for using Webkit when they obviously contribute a lot to it. I've posted 2 links showing you that is the case. They aren't "free loading", not anymore than Apple "free loaded" off of the KDE project.

That's just insane talk from people wanting to bash Google for no reason, just irrational hate.
__________________
"What you leave behind is not what is engraved in stone monuments, but what is woven into the lives of others."
-- Pericles
KnightWRX is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2012, 10:30 PM   #20
ixozet
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
I have Opera mini, like the speed :-)
ixozet is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 04:09 AM   #21
Technarchy
macrumors 68040
 
Technarchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Needs full screen support like Safari.
Technarchy is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 04:44 AM   #22
leon44
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, England
It's a really nice browser but it's not as integrated as Safari so I'll still only ever use it for it's very convenient incognito mode
leon44 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 05:00 AM   #23
MonkeySee....
macrumors 68040
 
MonkeySee....'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: UK
How does it use passbook??
__________________
If you’re busy making everything, how can you perfect anything? - Apple

Always keep the rhythm in your feet and a little party in your shoulders. - Phil Dunphy
MonkeySee.... is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 08:18 AM   #24
derek4484
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
totally agree with this

Quote:
Originally Posted by leon44 View Post
It's a really nice browser but it's not as integrated as Safari so I'll still only ever use it for it's very convenient incognito mode
Safari is completely integrated into the OS so that's the web browser I use on my iPhone. When I'm using my HTC Android phone, I use the default HTC web browser on that because its the most integrated as well. It's just easier. And I really dont see the need for different browsers on a phone. Tablet...maybe. Computer...definitely!
derek4484 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 08:32 AM   #25
JaySoul
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Since using Chrome on iPhone, I barely ever use Safari.

It has highlighted how poorly developed Safari really is.
JaySoul is online now   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Google Ending Support for Google Catalogs on iOS and Android August 15 MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 20 Aug 1, 2013 11:50 AM
Chrome for iOS Updated with Improved Google App Interoperability, Fullscreen iPad Support MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 32 Jul 21, 2013 06:56 PM
Google Updates YouTube for iOS App, Adds iPad, AirPlay, iPhone 5 Support MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 221 Dec 18, 2012 11:47 AM
Google Chrome Browser, Google Drive Coming to iOS [Now Available] MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 453 Dec 16, 2012 08:12 PM
can you get google maps and google streetview over iOS chrome browser? PacificBeach iPhone 1 Jun 30, 2012 03:42 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC