|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
iMac 2013 vs Eizo Coloredge for print?
I cant really desire, if I should go for the new Imac 27" or a Mac Mini with an Eizo Coloredge monitor.
My plan is to start on an education about graphic design in 2014, where the Imac will be fine, but I'm starting to interest me in fine art prints on canvas created in Photoshop/Illustrator and I want to make money from it. My closest photo dealer has the Canon imagePROGRAF iPF8400, which I will be using. So my question is, can the Imac 2013 be calibrated to show the same color (or very close), that I will be seeing on professionel prints or do I really need a proff monitor like the Eizo Coloredge? I just dont want to be surprised by the difference in colors when the work is printed. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Quote:
IMHO wait for the supposed update to the Mac Pro's that seems to be coming this year according to Tim Cook |
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 |
|
If the software you're using isn't terribly power hungry or if you don't need super fast processing with dedicated graphics then for the work you're doing a Mac Mini and Eizo monitor are much better than an iMac.
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I will be using most of the time Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign and Dreamweaver for web design, logo, business cards, packaging design and posters etc. I have no plan for video editing for now.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 |
|
then honestly in your position I would go for the Mac Mini and the Eizo I know it s pretty expensive but I think it will be worth it, I have the 2012 27" iMac and the display is not calibrated well from factory, I would get the 799 Mac Mini and upgrade RAM and the hard drive my self if necessary, later on you can upgrade to a Mac Pro if it gets refreshed.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The built in calibration tool is not a true colorimeter. I would go for the Xrite i1 pro and a any of the CG range. However we use Eizo & NEC monitors at work and if you know how to set them up properly you won't have any problems. The same can be said for an iMac though. Most people buy it, leave it all with the factory settings and then wonder why their prints are so dark.
__________________
Late 2012 21" iMac 2.9GHz i5, ITB Fusion drive, 16GB RAM, 2 TB TimeCapsule, iPhone 5 32GB, iPad 4 32GB, iPad 2 16GB, apple TV 2, iPod touch 4th gen 8GB, Xbox 360 120GB. Macrumors Scavenger Hunt IV 2 |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Quote:
With an i1, though, it cleans right up. ![]() (I do professional photography, so color accuracy = important!) |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#10 |
|
With all the respect to apple products, asking which one is the best eizo or iMac screen is like asking between Ferrari and Mazda.
Eizo are the best monitors in the world period. If you want the best of the best. They come from factory super calibrated, believe me no image rendition or idiotic bugs will ever never apper there. |
|
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 PM.








55-11
Hybrid Mode
