|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Apple in Talks to Bring HBO Go to the Apple TV
![]() Apple is in talks with HBO to bring that company's HBO Go video streaming service to the Apple TV, reports Bloomberg. HBO Go is a streaming service that allows HBO subscribers to watch HBO content on PCs, tablets, consoles, and other platforms. ![]() Quote:
There have been numerous rumors in recent years about Apple's plans for the television, but CEO Tim Cook has been cagey about details other than repeatedly saying that television is "an area of intense interest" for the company Article Link: Apple in Talks to Bring HBO Go to the Apple TV |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Good. Hope than can get MaxGo too.
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Come one. Come all.
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
#4 |
|
I want Apple TV to be like Sky, but better!
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
#5 |
|
They keep pulling the string...
__________________
ejc on Twitter |
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Amazon Prime Please
Thank you.
__________________
Mac Pro 2.66 Ghz 8 Core, 32GB RAM, 4Tb-4TB-4TB-4TB eSata GRaid, Quadro FX 4000 Mac Pro 2.26 Ghz 8 Core, 32GB RAM, 4Tb-4TB-2TB eSata GRaid, Flashed nVidia GTX 570 1.5 GB iPhone 4, iPad 2, iPad 3G |
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Sorry but everytime I read that line I keep thinking of something far more disgusting and I do not want to know what comes out after the string...
__________________
Various Apple Products |
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
#8 |
|
This is a nice step, I like where this is going recently. Come on Apple more content, more global content too!
__________________
Various Apple Products |
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
#9 |
|
tunein radio & spotify would be pretty neat as well
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#10 |
|
|
1
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Adding HBO Go is almost pointless. You can only get HBO Go if you subscribe to a TV package that includes HBO. So, this will in no way help any of us "cut the cord."
And... by the way, the main article states that only Netflix and Hulu are available. This is not true. You can also stream sporting events from several leagues. |
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Quote:
Apple is nowhere close to getting me to cutting the cable, and people who think that purchasing channels a la carte is better for them don't understand how content creators work. ESPN isn't going to sell you ESPN; it is going to sell you the ESPN Package: ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPNews, LHN.....for a higher price. A lower priced option won't be available. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#13 |
|
24Hz/fps and Plex, please!
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#14 |
|
WOOHOO!!! GIGGITY GIGGITY!!!
This is the moment I've been waiting for!!! |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Quote:
If somehow that lock is broken, I would expect a fee of at least double what HBO plus access to this app costs now... probably more than double. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#17 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Quote:
I have HBO, therefore HBO Go is awesome for me. And Apple TV incorporating it is even more awesome. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
-- Spiky |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#21 |
|
That'd be sweet.. oh, and Last.fm support too
__________________
Hell, there are no rules here.. we're trying to accomplish something. ~ Thomas Edison |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#22 |
|
spotify would be so sweet
__________________
27" iMac late2012, i5 2,9Ghz 8Gb RAM, 1TB Fusion Drive 11" MacbookAir 2011,1,6Ghz, 2GB RAM, 64GB SSD iPhone 5 16GB Black 8Gb iPod Nano 3G |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Catch up!
It is already on Roku.
I just don't get it, why is it always a big deal with Apple? This is like this whole deal with iTunes Match, were Apple went through everyone and their mama while both Amazon and Google already launched their cloud services, and then did what Apple did a couple of months later on their own terms, not the recording industry terms. What did Apple get? Praises from the music industry for 'doing it right'? Roku has Netflix, Hulu, Amazon, Amazon Cloud Player, Spotify, Pandora, Flex, Crackle, ESPN, and hundreds of international and content channels, plus the ability to stream any content from any PC, and the higher end model has a USB port downloaded content. Why is Apple TV so behind? |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Quote:
A partner like Netflix lays out big coin up front to woo video players to play ball. Apple generally wants to woo solely on the revenue potential of a cut AFTER Apple takes it's cut first. I've seen decision-maker executives on the video side comment that they'd love to do a deal with Apple but "Apple wants everything" (meaning extraordinarily good deal for Apple but little-to-nothing for 'us'). And, all of the video players have seen what happens when you help Apple gain heavy domination over an industry. They don't want to find themselves in the same type of spot as their music industry cousins. Apple wouldn't even allow owners/creators of music to set their own prices of their own products. The video guys (and music guys too) would rather feel some pain by helping many other players be successful instead of just handing it all over to Apple. Lastly, in Roku's case, that's their primary business. They are focused on making that as appealing as possible. They are not distracted by iDevices and computers and proprietary connectors and lawsuits, etc. Instead, they are focused on trying to do this kind of thing as right as they can do it. Apple refers to TV as a "hobby" (even 6 years on since releasing the first one) and they keep "pulling the string to see where it takes us" rather than getting very serious about it.Apple easily has the resources to put at least as many human resources on forging deals as a much smaller company like Roku does. Apple easily has the cash resources to out-spend Netflix to "grease the wheels" with industry players to get major content deals done. IMO, it's mostly a lack of focus on this part of the whole. And too bad if true, as I think the whole market is theirs for the taking if they would just get very serious about going after it. I suspect they are fixated on trying to make the (very pro-Apple) music deal again in a changed world where the next big target can clearly see the flaws in that deal for the Studios. Even the music industry hasn't allowed Apple to roll out any kind of Pandora-like subscription option yet, in spite of that rumor flying for what: 4+ years now? Why is that so hard to get done? Perhaps because Apple is a tough partner and the content owner's side of a "win:win" doesn't have enough win in it vs. doing such deals with others. Last edited by HobeSoundDarryl; Feb 1, 2013 at 08:58 AM. |
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#25 |
|
I would gladly cut the cord if I could subscribe to my local channels (and PBS stations) and 15 or so other networks. Maybe Apple can get HBO Go to no HBO cable subscribers that would be a plus and the start of independence from cable lock-ins.
__________________
MacBook (2nd Gen) 13" w/ backlit keyboard 2.4 Ghz 4 GB RAM, iPhone 4, iPad 2 |
|
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 AM.









TV as a "hobby" (even 6 years on since releasing the first one) and they keep "pulling the string to see where it takes us" rather than getting very serious about it.
Hybrid Mode
