Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Video

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Aug 31, 2007, 08:23 AM   #1
mrgreen4242
macrumors 601
 
mrgreen4242's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
FW 400 vs 800 for editing HDV

OK, gonna get an external HDD (or two or three eventually) and one of the uses will be to hold HDV video while it's being edited in iMovie/(maybe) FCE. Will a FW400 drive show any difference in real word performance (for this task) compared to FW800?

FW400 sustains close to 50MB/s, FW800 can hit nearly 100MB/s, SATA150/PATA133 drives can move up to 90MB/s, and SATAII could potentially do 180+MB/s. However, most drives barely max out the SATA150 bandwidth.

Now, AIC 1080i60 uses just 14MB/s, so even FW400 should be able to read two streams and write one all at the same time... But, that's just the math. The real world is always different. The other concern would be, of course, that an iMac has one FW400 channel and one FW800, so using the 800 for the drive and the 400 for the camera could help during importing?

Anyways, FW400 drives are cheaper and have more features than similar drives with FW800 connections, so it makes sense to only get an FW800 capable drive it it would offer a real world performance difference.

Thanks for any input!
__________________
Mac Pro 4,1, 8x2.26ghz, 10gb, 128gb SSD, 2x750gb (RAID1), 2tb, ATI6750
iPad air 64gb wifi - 16gb iPhone 5s - AppleTV3
mrgreen4242 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 31, 2007, 02:23 PM   #2
faustfire
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California
I have both and find no performance difference when editing hdv.
faustfire is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 31, 2007, 02:30 PM   #3
mrgreen4242
Thread Starter
macrumors 601
 
mrgreen4242's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by faustfire View Post
I have both and find no performance difference when editing hdv.
Thanks... I suspected that would be the case, but wanted to confirm it.
__________________
Mac Pro 4,1, 8x2.26ghz, 10gb, 128gb SSD, 2x750gb (RAID1), 2tb, ATI6750
iPad air 64gb wifi - 16gb iPhone 5s - AppleTV3
mrgreen4242 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 31, 2007, 06:52 PM   #4
lfielder06
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
I also have used both and notice no difference with HDV. I use fw800 because my camera uses my fw400. When transferring large files fw800 is the only way to go.
lfielder06 is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Video

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sony PD150 > FW 400 > 800 > TB ... Okay? smoking monkey Digital Video 4 Nov 10, 2013 11:10 PM
FireWire 800 or 400 and what to get DeafRaiders Buying Tips and Advice 5 Dec 24, 2012 09:49 AM
Mac Mini 2011 firewire 800 to 400 m1kygarcia Mac mini 13 Aug 19, 2012 07:01 AM
Firewire 800-400 Adapter or PICe Card? Garnick Mac Pro 3 Aug 4, 2012 06:35 PM
Firewire 400 to 800 converter iMovie issue JavaWizKid Digital Video 2 Jul 2, 2012 12:29 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC