Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Site and Forum Feedback

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 1, 2011, 09:20 PM   #1
Doctor Q
Administrator
 
Doctor Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles
New rules and guildelines for posting in debates

News stories and rumors sometimes produce contentious debates in forum threads. The same is frequently true of threads in the Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. When users have strongly differing opinions, they have the privilege as forum members to express their opinions but not the right to insult or belittle each other. This has long been the site policy and the basis for forum moderation.

Starting today we provide a set of Rules for Appropriate Debate to further clarify what's appropriate and what's inappropriate when posting in a debate. These rules reiterate the prohibitions in the general forum rules against personal insults, name-calling, and trolling, but also add specific requirements, e.g., that users be willing to provide a basis for claims of fact, that they avoid stereotypes and generalizations that constitute trolling and inhibit constructive debate, and that they not belabor a point by repeating it without adding new information. This will improve the quality of forum discussions in news threads, political threads, and other discussion threads.

Why?

Discussions of disputed topics too often devolve into personal flamewars that are of no benefit to other forum users and add little to our forums.

These rules are designed to set minimum levels of civility and encourage fact-based debates, not to promote or inhibit any point of view. We don't expect to change human nature, nor prevent users from having strong disagreements. As always, you can express almost any opinion in the forums but you must do so in an appropriate manner. Only members who have made at least 100 posts in counted forums can post in the Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum, but these rules apply to all forums.

We hope the responsibilities of forum users are clear from the guidelines we provide, but it's difficult to apply a fixed set of rules to human language. That's why the moderators use common sense in applying the forum rules and keep the reasons for the rules in mind. So should you.

Your part

The moderators have worked hard to develop these refinements to the forum rules, but your support is the real key. We invite users to set a good example in the forums, even in contentious debates, and to look for opportunities to inform and learn from others. If you see problems in the forums, please report them to the moderators.

If you have questions about any forum rule, you are welcome to use the Contact form to ask us about it privately or to post in a Site and Forum Feedback thread to ask general questions about rules and policies. You can post in this thread if you have questions or comments about the Rules for Appropriate Debate. Use the Contact form if you want to talk to us about a specific instance of moderation or member discipline.

Last edited by Doctor Q; Jan 1, 2011 at 09:27 PM.
Doctor Q is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2011, 09:43 PM   #2
jav6454
macrumors G5
 
jav6454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
Pretty soon we will need to have posts set up in MLA or APA format to continue to debate in a civil fashion.
__________________
Al MacBook 2.4GHz Late '08 | 5 S⃣ | Macross Click Me
jav6454 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2011, 04:00 AM   #3
Hellhammer
Moderator
 
Hellhammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Send a message via MSN to Hellhammer
Finally a rule for sources! I'm too tired to debate against people who cannot provide any backup for their statements while I always try to base my posts on facts that I can backup with sources.

Good job Doc Q and others, maybe this will calm this place down a bit at least
__________________
SSD Editor for AnandTech
You can also follow me in Twitter!
Hellhammer is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2011, 11:33 AM   #4
Maxiseller
macrumors 6502a
 
Maxiseller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Little grey, chilly island.
Or, in my case, stop people posting for fear of having their posts removed. The whole idea of a debate is having an opinion; not necessarily having to substantiate it.
Maxiseller is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2011, 11:38 AM   #5
QuarterSwede
macrumors 604
 
QuarterSwede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxiseller View Post
Or, in my case, stop people posting for fear of having their posts removed. The whole idea of a debate is having an opinion; not necessarily having to substantiate it.
Agreed. Especially when dealing with religious and political debates.

This is exactly why I block Politics, Religion, Social Issues forums. I don't come here to get into arguments, especially ones that no one can win.
__________________
“In a world of idiots, the average man is king."

"Next to the Word of God, the noble art of music is the greatest treasure in the world." -- Martin Luther
QuarterSwede is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2011, 11:45 AM   #6
GGJstudios
macrumors Westmere
 
Join Date: May 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellhammer View Post
Finally a rule for sources! I'm too tired to debate against people who cannot provide any backup for their statements while I always try to base my posts on facts that I can backup with sources.
I completely agree! This has been needed for a while, since there have been so many misleading statements being posted.
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuarterSwede View Post
This is exactly why I block Politics, Religion, Social Issues forums. I don't come here to get into arguments, especially ones that no one can win.
I rarely, if ever, even look at PRSI threads. Like you said, it's a lose-lose scenario.
GGJstudios is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2011, 11:47 AM   #7
r.j.s
Moderator emeritus
 
r.j.s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fort Knox
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxiseller View Post
The whole idea of a debate is having an opinion; not necessarily having to substantiate it.
There is still nothing wrong with posting an opinion.

However, members who post an opinion as fact, or repeatedly post the same thing, without adding anything new to further discussion, are going to have to adjust to the new rules.
r.j.s is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2011, 12:01 PM   #8
dukebound85
macrumors P6
 
dukebound85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 5045 feet above seal level
I am not sure I like these changes for a few reasons
1) Those who troll or insult can be reported via PM
2) Opinions should be able to be stated in an argument and not need to be backed up by sources. Sources are nice, but requiring them? These are discussion threads on topics on the internet, not an official venue of anything

My suggestions would be to simply
1) report trolling/namecalling posts
2) request that if a point is brought up and taken hold of, that the person who brought up the point provide evidence or stop pressing the point....but not necessarily require sources right off

I know that many post as the topic interests them and want to discuss it but do not have in many cases the time to go dig up articles.

I don't feel that MR needs to take an active role in debate threads in terms of moderation aside from what has been done (not tolerating spam, name calling, trolling, etc). I feel debate threads should take whatever form as long as they are adhering to decency rules. I guess my point is that these forums are not akin to "debate club" and should not necessarily be treated as such. Besides, I have felt that moderation on past threads has been more than adequate in keeping the topic on topic and civil

Just my opinion
dukebound85 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2011, 12:04 PM   #9
r.j.s
Moderator emeritus
 
r.j.s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fort Knox
Quote:
Originally Posted by dukebound85 View Post
2) Opinions should be able to be stated in an argument and not need to be backed up by sources. Sources are nice, but requiring them? These are discussion threads on topics on the internet, not an official venue of anything
Sources are only required for statements of fact, or statements that are intended to be fact. Opinions are still allowed.
r.j.s is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2011, 12:04 PM   #10
GGJstudios
macrumors Westmere
 
Join Date: May 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by dukebound85 View Post
2) Opinions should be able to be stated in an argument and not need to be backed up by sources.
Did you see this?:
Quote:
Originally Posted by r.j.s View Post
There is still nothing wrong with posting an opinion.

However, members who post an opinion as fact, or repeatedly post the same thing, without adding anything new to further discussion, are going to have to adjust to the new rules.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dukebound85 View Post
Just my opinion
What are your sources?
GGJstudios is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2011, 12:13 PM   #11
QuarterSwede
macrumors 604
 
QuarterSwede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Quote:
Originally Posted by r.j.s View Post
There is still nothing wrong with posting an opinion.

However, members who post an opinion as fact, or repeatedly post the same thing, without adding anything new to further discussion, are going to have to adjust to the new rules.
Ahhh. Now that is an improvement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGJstudios View Post
Did you see this?:


What are your sources?
Copied directly from the Debate Rules page:
Quote:
Sources: If you make claims of fact but don't cite sources when requested, the posts may be removed. If you started the thread then the thread may be closed or removed.

Repetition: If you repeat the same claims without adding new information, the posts may be removed. If you started the thread then the thread may be closed or removed.

Trolling: Posts that appear to be designed to cause argument or irritate rather than contribute to a constructive discussion are considered trolling and will be treated as such.

Duplicate discussions: If a new thread repeats a topic that has been previously discussed or debated, without basis for a separate discussion, the thread may be closed, removed, or merged into an earlier thread on the same topic. A news report on a previously discussed issue doesn't automatically deserve a new thread.
Sorry for the double post. I forgot I was the last one to post.
__________________
“In a world of idiots, the average man is king."

"Next to the Word of God, the noble art of music is the greatest treasure in the world." -- Martin Luther

Last edited by MacDawg; Jan 2, 2011 at 12:14 PM. Reason: Merge
QuarterSwede is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2011, 12:16 PM   #12
GGJstudios
macrumors Westmere
 
Join Date: May 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuarterSwede View Post
Copied directly from the Debate Rules page:
You missed the point. It was a joke:
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGJstudios View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dukebound85 View Post
Just my opinion
What are your sources?
GGJstudios is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2011, 01:25 PM   #13
Hellhammer
Moderator
 
Hellhammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Send a message via MSN to Hellhammer
Quote:
Originally Posted by r.j.s View Post
Sources are only required for statements of fact, or statements that are intended to be fact. Opinions are still allowed.
One thing people still often forget is to clearly separate what is their opinion and what is their statement based on facts. At least I face it sometimes that people first talk about facts and then add their opinion without adding any sign of it being just their opinion (like IMO, just my two cents etc).

On great example is from 2010 MBA speculation when some folks typed in caps lock and then few posts after told that it was just their opinion. Errr...you don't have to post your opinions in caps lock, do you? It also lacked a sign of it being just an opinion. Things like these start flame wars, stating your opinion as a fact. If you simply say it's your opinion, then all people can do is disagree. We are all entitled to have our own opinion.

IMO, it might be worth it to add a line to state that when in debate, it is advisable to clearly separate what is your statement based on facts/sources and what is just your own opinion. Not in every thread of course but when the threads is clearly a debate thread where facts and opinions may easily be mixed without proper notation.
__________________
SSD Editor for AnandTech
You can also follow me in Twitter!
Hellhammer is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2011, 02:56 PM   #14
annk
Administrator
 
annk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellhammer View Post
...

IMO, it might be worth it to add a line to state that when in debate, it is advisable to clearly separate what is your statement based on facts/sources and what is just your own opinion. Not in every thread of course but when the threads is clearly a debate thread where facts and opinions may easily be mixed without proper notation.
I'm fairly certain that one will sort itself out quickly. In addition to it being made clearer in the newly-honed rules, a member who posts something that can be interpreted as a claim of fact will likely be challenged. They will then have to say whether it was simply their opinion, or back it up with something.

It's also possible to debate the reliability of sources, but at least then people are debating something concrete, and again it will have to come down to "I don't feel that source is trustworthy" (opinion), or "here's a study that refutes that claim" (debating the source's reliability on the basis of another source).

The whole point is to make the rules clearer, both for those debating and for those moderating. The problem up to now has been how to moderate problems we can see, but for which the framework as stated wasn't clear enough for us.
annk is offline   0 Reply With Quote


Reply
MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Site and Forum Feedback

Tags
announcement

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New sleeve and case for my new 17" MBP Unibody... amitdoc2b MacBook Pro 8 Feb 23, 2009 08:31 AM
I got the new command and conquer for my new imac and I love it! togermano iMac 1 Sep 2, 2007 11:37 PM
Nintendo Wii to launch in November and sell for £149 in UK Axegrinder Games 29 Sep 9, 2006 10:34 AM
Marketplace Rules - read before posting in this forum Doctor Q Marketplace Archive 2 0 Jan 20, 2006 10:58 PM
New incentives and perks for .Mac members MacBytes MacBytes.com News Discussion 19 May 20, 2004 08:24 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC