Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 19, 2011, 11:06 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple Requests Dismissal of iTunes Antitrust Case Following Jobs Deposition






Late last month, we noted that Apple CEO Steve Jobs had been ordered to appear for a deposition in a 2005 lawsuit regarding the company's FairPlay digital rights management (DRM) system in place at that time for iTunes Store music content. The lawsuit contends that Apple's move to prevent the playing of music files from RealNetworks on iPods was anticompetitive.

According to a new report from Bloomberg, Jobs did indeed provide the required deposition on April 12th, and Apple has now requested dismissal of the case.
Quote:
"Apple's view is that iPods work better when consumers use the iTunes jukebox rather than third party software that can cause corruption or other problems," [Apple attorney Robert] Mittelstaedt said at a hearing.

Apple had cited 58 consumer downloading complaints as the source of its decision to upgrade iPods to exclude other companies' downloads working with the hand-held devices.
Neither Apple nor the plaintiffs have performed scientific testing to determine whether third-party downloads were in fact responsible for the issues experienced by consumers, leading the trial judge to comment that the case may simply come down to a "battle of experts". A decision on Apple's request for dismissal is expected by next month.

Article Link: Apple Requests Dismissal of iTunes Antitrust Case Following Jobs Deposition
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 11:09 AM   #2
AppleScruff1
macrumors 604
 
AppleScruff1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Apple can dish it out but can't take it.
AppleScruff1 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 11:17 AM   #3
toddybody
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: On Mars, thinking about my father...
Not the end of the world...I can still put non-iTunes music on there. When that shoe drops...then Ill freak on ol' Apple.
toddybody is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 11:17 AM   #4
kingtj
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Poolesville, MD
Send a message via ICQ to kingtj
Huh?

I would understand the merit of a lawsuit like this if iPods only played Apple proprietary file formats. If the ONLY type of file one would play was a DRM'd AAC (M4P) file? Then you'd at least have some basis for an argument. (Although even then? I think such a move would have simply rendered the iPod an inconsequential device in the marketplace -- so there wouldn't be anyone feeling a need to bring a suit in the first place.)

Since all iPods play standard MP3 files just fine, though? It seems to me it's fully capable of using the single most popular digital music file format in existence already. If it didn't play Real's proprietary file format, so what? Real and everyone else wanting to sell music should have simply ditched the DRM protection anyway, and then they wouldn't have such problems.
kingtj is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 11:54 AM   #5
Popeye206
macrumors 68030
 
Popeye206's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NE PA USA
Makes no sense why on a classic iPod platform you'd want another player besides what is managed through iTunes. You can put anything in there.

Seems as though Apple does not care about 3rd party application players (besides Flash players) on the iOS devices. But still... it's an Apple product and iTunes is their application to manage your iOS device. Sooo again... I don't see any issue other than Real Networks lost the battle so they're grasping at straws.
Popeye206 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 11:58 AM   #6
aristotle
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada
You can put non-DRM'ed AAC and MP3 format files all day long onto the device.

Real Networks was expecting for Apple to support their use of Fairplay DRM which would be a loss for Apple since they would be supporting some other company's customers for "free" if something did not play on the iPod bought from their store.
__________________
15" Retina MBP, 2.7 Ghz Quad Core i7, 16 GB RAM, 768 GB SSD (10.9.2)
24" iMac, 2.8 GHz, 4GB RAM, 320 GB HD; 128 GB iPad Air LTE (iOS 7.0.4); 64 GB iPhone 5S (iOS 7.1.1)
aristotle is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 12:02 PM   #7
allpar
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2002
Can I sue Canon because my scanner only works with their driver and plugin?

Can I sue Apple because my iPod only works with their driver and app?

Can I sue Microsoft because Access only works within their operating system?
__________________
Mac statistics software vs big rigs
allpar is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 12:06 PM   #8
pdjudd
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Plymouth, MN
Remember, the suit dates back to 2005 - long before Amazon started selling music and long before iTunes went Music DRM free. Bringing up current scenarios is not going to mean much since the case is not bringing brought up today - it's dealing with actions and complaints made in and prior to, 2005.

That being said, even using arguments from 2005, I don't see much to go on, Creative was essentially hacking closed source software involving encryption - something Real had no business messing with without a license from Apple which they made no effort to get and one that Apple is not obligated to provide (Apple certainly can show that they were contractually obligated to defend any exploits).

Not to mention that iTunes is a closed source program too.

Both of these reasons, one that the actions of Real were wrong in the first place, and two, they are moot back then (since iTunes can accept multiple non DRM sources and cannot be enforced to license other DRM formats and the DRM can be stripped by burning and ripping), and now given that iTunes tracks are all DRM free.
pdjudd is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 12:19 PM   #9
toddybody
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: On Mars, thinking about my father...
Quote:
Originally Posted by allpar View Post
Can I sue Canon because my scanner only works with their driver and plugin?

Can I sue Apple because my iPod only works with their driver and app?

Can I sue Microsoft because Access only works within their operating system?
You CAN sue anyone for anything...now winning is a little different
toddybody is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 12:28 PM   #10
Consultant
macrumors G5
 
Consultant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
There are plenty of other music players and music stores.

Probably will end up similar to Psystar case.

Wait, PlayStation only works with playstation games? Nintendo only works with nintendo games? Xbox only works with xbox games? SUE THEM ALL! Not.
Consultant is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 12:32 PM   #11
Popeye206
macrumors 68030
 
Popeye206's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NE PA USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Consultant View Post
There are plenty of other music players and music stores.

Probably will end up similar to Psystar case.

Wait, PlayStation only works with playstation games? Nintendo only works with nintendo games? Xbox only works with xbox games? SUE THEM ALL! Not.
OMG! You are so right! When will this anti-trust game end?
Popeye206 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 12:33 PM   #12
coder12
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Fargo, ND: The greatest city on Earth.
Quote:
Originally Posted by allpar View Post
Can I sue Canon because my scanner only works with their driver and plugin?

Can I sue Apple because my iPod only works with their driver and app?

Can I sue Microsoft because Access only works within their operating system?
Technically yes, but you probably won't win

edit: dang you toddboddy! Ninja'd!
__________________
Just plain nuts!
coder12 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 12:39 PM   #13
toddybody
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: On Mars, thinking about my father...
Quote:
Originally Posted by coder12 View Post
Technically yes, but you probably won't win

edit: dang you toddboddy! Ninja'd!
All good dude Lets share the wealth
toddybody is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 12:40 PM   #14
FriarNurgle
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
It's the...

It's the "Our Consumers Are Idiots" defense.
__________________
2011 13" MBP - base i5 model Iphone 4 - AT&T ATV2 Kids have iPod Touches
FriarNurgle is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 12:43 PM   #15
KnoxHarrington
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Networks will have a response to this motion as soon as buffering is complete.
KnoxHarrington is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 12:46 PM   #16
thejadedmonkey
macrumors 604
 
thejadedmonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pa
Send a message via AIM to thejadedmonkey
Quote:
"Apple's view is that iPods work better when consumers use the iTunes jukebox rather than third party software that can cause corruption or other problems," [Apple attorney Robert] Mittelstaedt said at a hearing.
Er, did Apple just forget that when they first offered the iPod for Windows, it sync'd using MusicMatch Jukebox, which was "third party software"?
__________________
MacBook 17" MacBook Pro iPod Nano Apple TV
PS4 Custom Windows 8.1 Desktop WP8.1
"Good judgment comes from experience,
experience comes from bad judgment."
- Mulla Nasrudin
thejadedmonkey is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 12:50 PM   #17
Iconoclysm
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by thejadedmonkey View Post
Er, did Apple just forget that when they first offered the iPod for Windows, it sync'd using MusicMatch Jukebox, which was "third party software"?
No, it clearly says thatt hey removed that functionality because of 58 consumer complaints.
Iconoclysm is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 01:09 PM   #18
ericmooreart
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NY,NY
58 consumer complaints out of 42 million ipods sold through 2005. Thats 1 in every 724,137 people. Thats .7 complaints for the State of Wyoming. Hold the press! Ban third party players
__________________
3D on a Mac
www.runtimepictures.com
Quad Core i7 3.4 Ghz Hackentosh NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 2 128gb SSD running 10.9.2 and Windows 7 2 Mac Minis 1st gen iPad
ericmooreart is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 01:10 PM   #19
126351
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconoclysm View Post
No, it clearly says thatt hey removed that functionality because of 58 consumer complaints.
Shame Apple picks and choses when 58 complaints is enough to change their practices.
126351 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 01:14 PM   #20
Stridder44
macrumors 68040
 
Stridder44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
I guess RealNetworks has to have some creative ways to make money these days.
__________________
iPhone 5
MacBook Pro 2.53GHz/320GB HDD/4GB RAM
iMac G4 800MHz/80GB HDD/512MB RAM
Stridder44 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 01:35 PM   #21
pdjudd
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Plymouth, MN
Quote:
Originally Posted by thejadedmonkey View Post
Er, did Apple just forget that when they first offered the iPod for Windows, it sync'd using MusicMatch Jukebox, which was "third party software"?
That's becasue Apple had an existing agreement with MusicMatch - Musicmatch actually did some level of support for the iPod. This lawsuit postdates that arrangement after Apple started offering iTunes for Windows.

Creative/Real never had any such agreement with Real.
pdjudd is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2011, 08:56 PM   #22
skinned66
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ottawa, Canada
As some other posters already pointed out that iPods were/are not limited to iTunes music, until recently they had a "disk mode" option to sync with whatever the hell software you wanted since it was just a matter of copying the music files.

I think they should have kept this - not like I'd use it, but still.
skinned66 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 20, 2011, 03:39 AM   #23
caspersoong
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
If Apple disallowed usage of ripped CDs, now that would cause major outrage.
__________________
New iPad (White), 32GB ; 13" MacBook Pro (Late 2011), 2.4 GHz i5 with 256 GB Crucial M4 SSD; iPhone 4S (Black), 16 GB.
caspersoong is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 20, 2011, 07:41 AM   #24
pdjudd
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Plymouth, MN
Quote:
Originally Posted by caspersoong View Post
If Apple disallowed usage of ripped CDs, now that would cause major outrage.
They could do lots of things that would outrage people. Trouble is, Apple has no reason to do that since it would a very overt act that would be terrible for business since no same person is going to rely on purchased content entirely. I cannot remember who did that, but someone tried to assert their music service was superior because they could fill up an iPod like device for some monthly fee compared to $5000 for the Apple device. It was pointed out that the vast majority of music used on iPod devices at the time were vanilla mp3's obtained from CD and not from the iTunes store.
pdjudd is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 20, 2011, 07:48 AM   #25
maclaptop
macrumors 65816
 
maclaptop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Western Hemisphere
Apple -

Terrific products,

Pompous culture,

Legions of Yes men,

What an entertaining movie
maclaptop is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apple Files Formal Appeal in E-Books Antitrust Case MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 95 Mar 6, 2014 01:46 PM
Apple Wins Brief Stay of External Monitoring in E-Books Antitrust Case MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 34 Jan 28, 2014 05:10 AM
Apple Requests Removal of External Compliance Monitor in E-Book Antitrust Case MacRumors Mac Blog Discussion 38 Jan 15, 2014 02:01 AM
Apple Could Owe $500 Million After Being Found Guilty in E-Book Antitrust Case MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 149 Jul 29, 2013 09:45 AM
Tim Cook Ordered to Give Deposition in Employee-Poaching Ban Antitrust Case MacRumors Mac Blog Discussion 44 Jan 22, 2013 12:50 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC