Forget 10.2, and wavefield synthesis is
They should have hired the people behind this technology:
http://iosono-sound.com/
Forget that, it works but it is too intensive. 10.2 is rubbish, it only means that next decade we need 20.4, zillion.zillion eventually.
What we need is a better way to manage audio. A method that stores the XYZ (yes Z!) components of a directional sound, storing and managing it INDEPENDENTLY of the sound system capabilities.
Then the system renders it to the best ability of the attached speakers, and SCALES properly. Ie, you have 6 speakers in a ring, it will work, you have stereo speakers, it will do the best it can, you have 8 speakers in a cube - it will deliver proper surround sound with HEIGHT...
It exists today, fully researched etc. It's called Ambisonics. It will revolutionise the movie industry, except that the likes of THX have a _marketing_ advantage
Yes, I am an audio production professional, and ambisonic sound works amazingly well. Wavefield synthesis (Iosono etc) is very good in some ways, but it does not scale, is horribly intensive of resources (128 channels etc), and is only planar - cannot go 3D... Ambisonics scales properly and very elegantly degrades to stereo.
PB