Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

brainzilla

macrumors member
Oct 28, 2007
35
0
Bit annoying to have the power lead on the front though, poking out all the time where you can see it/ where it gets in the way

My guess here is that this is indeed some sort of Macbook stand - so those connectors would be on the back. That would also explain the rather CHEAP plastic they used.

Also it lacks the 2.0 audio and the mag-power.
 

wikus

macrumors 68000
Jun 1, 2011
1,795
2
Planet earth.
1. Yup
2. Not if it's going through the TB port

Wouldnt there be overhead on the controller or something in the Apple computer itself holding back USB 3.0 speeds? I would agree that on a hub with TB and USB 3.0 two separate drives copying files between eachother should give faster speeds than USB 2.0....??
 

aaaaaaron

macrumors regular
Jun 30, 2010
144
0
when they make part 2 of this dock with esata, usb3, and another TB port, i will be interested.
 

neilw

macrumors 6502
Aug 4, 2003
439
834
New Jersey
Those are pretty clearly USB2.0 connectors, not USB3.0.

This looks useful. I'd expect price to be ~ $150. I am mildly bummed that Apple didn't see fit to offer any way to integrate the power connection (somehow) with the Thunderbolt port, so there'd be a true one-connection dock, but this is still way better than reconnecting Ethernet, USB, monitor, and power each time.
 

brainzilla

macrumors member
Oct 28, 2007
35
0
Wouldnt there be overhead on the controller or something in the Apple computer itself holding back USB 3.0 speeds? I would agree that on a hub with TB and USB 3.0 two separate drives copying files between eachother should give faster speeds than USB 2.0....??

Overhead is not the problem here - USB3 drivers are.
Copys within the USB3 would depend on the USB3-chipset behind the Thunderbolt-lane.

The "blue connectors" was a good hint - this one will be USB2.
 

benpatient

macrumors 68000
Nov 4, 2003
1,870
0
1. Yup
2. Not if it's going through the TB port

are there USB 3.0 drivers for the mac yet?

I would love one of these, but if it doesn't do double duty as a stand, they are really missing an opportunity.

I hate plugging in my MBP every day at the office. I have binder clips all over the place keeping wires in place while I'm gone, and there is this whole ritual of plugging and unplugging everything each morning that I could do without.

The only "docking" option available takes away the use of your screen and keyboard, which isn't a good option for me.

I'm really hoping this thing is $99 and comes with a TB cable.
 

basesloaded190

macrumors 68030
Oct 16, 2007
2,693
5
Wisconsin
are there USB 3.0 drivers for the mac yet?

I would love one of these, but if it doesn't do double duty as a stand, they are really missing an opportunity.

I hate plugging in my MBP every day at the office. I have binder clips all over the place keeping wires in place while I'm gone, and there is this whole ritual of plugging and unplugging everything each morning that I could do without.

The only "docking" option available takes away the use of your screen and keyboard, which isn't a good option for me.

I'm really hoping this thing is $99 and comes with a TB cable.

No sure on how usb 3.0 drivers work.

I do agree that this would be the ultimate stand/dock. I am going to purchase a stand for my MBP and was looking at a dock, but if something can do both, awesome.
 

MacRacer

macrumors regular
Aug 28, 2008
156
0
My Race Car
I would love to see this with USB 3.0 but I have the feeling that the device that it connects to will need USB 3.0 support (software) and a USB 3.0 controller to handle USB 3.0. But I will use Firewire 800 over USB 2 anyday.
 

iSee

macrumors 68040
Oct 25, 2004
3,539
272
This is cool but I wish they would build a nice big monitor into it. :D
 

CrAkD

macrumors 68040
Feb 15, 2010
3,180
255
Boston, MA
nice now we just need a single external hd thats thunderbolt.....or an external enclosure thats thunderbolt.
 

wrinkster22

macrumors 68030
Jun 11, 2011
2,623
7
Toronto
I like this as
a) I cant afford the TB display
b) I could use this and daisychain a display to this
c) I could use an book arc to hold my mba
it would look nice... or i could forget about it.......
 

57004

Cancelled
Aug 18, 2005
1,022
341
This is JUST what I need. And, unlike other announced Thunderbolt devices (like the Sonnet ExpressCard adapter) it seems to come with its own cable so it won't need Apple's $50 cable.

Also Belkin products are usually not in the same price range as Apple accessories. I'm also hoping for 100-150$ (or rather Euro, in my case).

It should support an external display through the daisy chain port through, otherwise it would be useless to me.

Edit: It probably will work with an external display, according to this blog post it worked with the promise raid array anyway.

By the way I'd also miss USB 3.0 but if it's not there then I'd probably get it anyway. By the way they don't HAVE to be blue. I can't imagine Apple putting a blue port on their laptops on which all the other ports are light grey. They're too much into design to do that.
 
Last edited:

diamond.g

macrumors G4
Mar 20, 2007
11,100
2,440
OBX
Those are pretty clearly USB2.0 connectors, not USB3.0.

This looks useful. I'd expect price to be ~ $150. I am mildly bummed that Apple didn't see fit to offer any way to integrate the power connection (somehow) with the Thunderbolt port, so there'd be a true one-connection dock, but this is still way better than reconnecting Ethernet, USB, monitor, and power each time.

I believe TB offers 10W of power (which isn't enough for firewire by itself) per port.
 

jdechko

macrumors 601
Jul 1, 2004
4,230
325
why did they not include any display ports?

Do you mean full size display port? Because for all intents and purposes the Thunderbolt port is a miniDisplayPort, though not the other way around.

Unless I missed something...
 

danielwsmithee

macrumors 65816
Mar 12, 2005
1,135
410
Power

For those of you complaining about the power port on the front. It is not on the front, it is on the back. The picture is of the back, the side with the TB cable would be the front, facing your MBP.

I do wish this had USB 3.0 though. eSATA and SATA are dead soon so this is fine without those.
 

kainjow

Moderator emeritus
Jun 15, 2000
7,958
7
Definitely getting this. eSATA and/or an extra FireWire 800 port would have been nice though.
 

brainzilla

macrumors member
Oct 28, 2007
35
0
eSATA and SATA are dead soon so this is fine without those.

Right... USB and SATA/eSATA are two VERY different things.
SATA is a rather low level protocol for short ranged, fast transmissions.
USB has a huge protocol-overlay on both sides and a quite long cable range on cheap cable running in noisy environments. USB knows different protocols and speeds and so on.

Without SATA there would be no HDD to put in your USB case :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.