But Arn, our bet is still on. I'm still thinking that Apple this year tightened down all their security (including sending people to raid other people's houses), and has made sure that no leaks ever pass by.
Alright, it's on!
arn
But Arn, our bet is still on. I'm still thinking that Apple this year tightened down all their security (including sending people to raid other people's houses), and has made sure that no leaks ever pass by.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_4 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8K2 Safari/6533.18.5)
I believe on Tuesday we will see the N94 as the newest iphone and the N90a replacing the 3GS.
I think the teardrop form factor will never happen and I think the existence of a larger screen would have likely given up the existence of a real iPhone 5. Many people have astutely noted between the late Verizon iPhone 4 launch and a possible l
Lte iPhone 5 in 2012 this makes the most sense. The presentation will focus on both the substantially upgraded hardware for the 4s or whatever designation it gets and iOS 5.
An 8 gig iPhone 4 for 49 would be an absolutely killer low end device. This is one of the reasons why I think a newly designed low end device will not happen. It is not necessary.
Apple may have the top 3 selling smartphones of 2011 if the 4s has a big quarter. They could also dominate 2012 with the 4, 4s and 5 and take the top three spots two years in a row.
Alright, it's on!
arn
Alright, it's on!
arn
Okay, so just curious about this, as I'm new to this rumor industry. But were there specific leaks about the production for iPhone 4, or iPad 2? Not part leaks, mind you, but tell-tale signs that there is production of those new devices going on?
With that in mind, the Cava 22 incident was obviously taken very seriously by Apple, with getting the PD involved as well as sending their high profile security officers. Would Apple do this for any lost iPhone prototype? Probably. Would Apple be more likely to do this for a radically different iPhone 5 (different design, bigger screen, etc.) versus an iPhone 4S (same case, faster processor, more RAM, better camera, basically things that are indiscernible without dissembling the phone)? Most definitely.
Just something to think about.
I mentioned this in another thread but didn't get any possible explanations. Why is Apple calling the next phone the iPhone 4S? Why don't they call it the iPhone 5?
Part leaks are some of the signs that things have shifted into production.
iPhone 4 was a special case since Gizmodo leaked the entire device. Parts were uninteresting and probably went unreported, since we'd seen the whole device.
arn
Has anyone considered that the leaked prototype design for the 'iPhone 5' might actually be the new larger redesigned iPod Touch instead? If this is the case I would find it disappointing that the iPod Touch got a larger screen before the next iPhone. My gut feeling says that's exactly what will happen.
Part leaks are some of the signs that things have shifted into production.
iPhone 4 was a special case since Gizmodo leaked the entire device. Parts were uninteresting and probably went unreported, since we'd seen the whole device.
arn
Also, even if we get a iPhone 4 with better internals, I hope Apple calls it the iPhone 5 and we can avoid the number confusion game.
Did any iPad 2 parts leak beforehand? I know that the case design was known well before the release but I can't recall much else.
No. The only actual leaks were related to iOS (FaceTime, 2 cameras, Photobooth).
Did any iPad 2 parts leak beforehand? I know that the case design was known well before the release but I can't recall much else.
AIP5 said:Part leaks are some of the signs that things have shifted into production.
iPhone 4 was a special case since Gizmodo leaked the entire device. Parts were uninteresting and probably went unreported, since we'd seen the whole device.
arn
I dunno Arn, but if it's part leaks that we're basing the production theory on, then not very convincing.
Okay, what about this: I remember there was a post on MR about a leaked "iPhone 5" camera (without LED light). If I recall correctly, the camera had a circle around it that was made out of an Aluminum-like metal material. Or at least so it appeared. Many comments were made on it, but I'm not sure if we concluded anything about it.
Edit: here's that article: https://www.macrumors.com/2011/08/2...ack-camera-and-audio-flex-cable-parts-leaked/
I think there is no chance a larger display would have been developed and prepared for production without several strong rumors about it's existence.
Of all the pieces that would be the most difficult to hide that would be the one and I don't recall any even semi reliable rumors a out larger displays being tested, prepared, ordered or manufactured. Given the number of devices they would be ramping up to make they could not hide the development of 15 million 4" screens where none were needed before.
To be very honest, I'm gonna be TOTALLY dissapointed with Apple if they don't release the iPhone 5. I've waiting to buy a new phone since June. No iPhone 5 = Samsung Galaxy S2 or Nexus Prime for me. Don't care about how many thumbs down you gonna give me.
This is true. I would have also expected some different screen size leaks. But, given how badly the iPhone 4 security was managed (apart from the chance Gizmodo finding, there was the iPhone 4 prototype in Vietnam, and random iPhone 4 prototypes on sale on Ebay), you'd think that Apple learned from its mistakes and patched all those security holes.
I dunno. I know I'm trying to rationalize my way out of this, but in the end of the day, I find myself coming back to my theory about why Apple didn't use "rumors" to quell down these iPhone 5 expectations. And for that, no one seems to be able to find an answer.
This is an interesting theory that I am somewhat behind. I don't understand why Apple isn't doing this if an iPhone 5 isn't going to be announced because there will likely be a massive backlash online that may overshadow the announcement.