Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

longofest

Editor emeritus
Jul 10, 2003
2,925
1,693
Falls Church, VA
What kind of bump will this be on benchmarks? 20%?

Not going to see 20% from these bumps. More like 5-10... maybe. Look at it like a slight refresh of the line until Ivy Bridge comes out around March/April. THAT will give you the 20%+ bump.

I do like that they finally updated the 15" model to have more VRAM. 256mb was so anemic. 512 is still a little on the small side, but is at least acceptable.
 

jjahshik32

macrumors 603
Sep 4, 2006
5,366
52
Sweet, the biggest upgrade comes for the low end 15" macbook pro now getting the ati 6750 with 512mb vram with the same price. It doesnt hurt that it gets 2.2GHz now too! Huge upgrade imo. :D
 

gnasher729

Suspended
Nov 25, 2005
17,980
5,565
Meh... here was me hoping for SSD to be standard (at least in the higher configs).

And you would of course be quite willing to pay the price for an SSD drive, right? I've got 500 GB right now in my MBP and I'll upgrade to 1TB when it is available at 7200rpm, for a price that would get me 64 GB SSD.


Can someone explain to me what the advantage is of the 2.5GB quad core i7 processor which is available as a £200 extra compared to the 2.4GB quad core i7 processor that comes as standard on the top end 15' model?

It gives you the right to brag that you have the fastest 15" MacBook Pro ever. Apart from that, not much. For £200, I'd buy two of the following three: 8 GB RAM, large drive for backups, laser printer. Or two cheap 24" monitors.
 
Last edited:

foidulus

macrumors 6502a
Jan 15, 2007
904
1
Optical drive STILL not optional

The biggest disappointment of this bump was the optical drive, namely the fact that it's still there and you have to take it apart(which isn't allowed for a lot of company owned laptops....) in order to put two disk(ssd/hd) in there.....
 

carmenodie

macrumors 6502a
Apr 25, 2008
775
0
To hell with this update because the graphics on the 13 inch models sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Intel HD 3000 is garbage!
I'll keep my late 2008 13 inch Al macbook thank you. Nvidia rocks!
 

DustinT

macrumors 68000
Feb 26, 2011
1,556
0
Wow they changed also the gfx card, not bad for a minor update/speed bump!
Agreed. That graphics card update should help the performance of the base 15" models a pretty good bit. I'm excited.
 

jvmxtra

macrumors 65816
Sep 21, 2010
1,245
3
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

No scott
 

Stella

macrumors G3
Apr 21, 2003
8,838
6,341
Canada
Nice upgrades, I suppose - minor speed boost for no extra cost than previous.

I see BT is still 2.x, yet Apple put BT 4.0 into the Airs? Why not the MBP?
 

Samuriajackon

macrumors 6502
Feb 9, 2009
304
1
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

Glass! said:
A very uninspiring update :/ I guess I'll wait for the Ivy Bridge MBPs next year.

Also, anyone else noticed that they haven't put the little "New" icon above the MacBook Pros on the store page, like they usually do?

Mac uodates? On a Monday? Really?
 

Diversion

macrumors 6502a
Oct 5, 2007
773
142
Jacksonville, Florida
I feel a little remorse because I just bought my 2.2ghz/6750 15" pro like 2 months ago.. Oh well, I knew this would happen :p

I'm thinking i'll be waiting for Ivy Bridge or 2nd gen Ivy Bridge before an upgrade seems worthwhile.
 

paulrbeers

macrumors 68040
Dec 17, 2009
3,963
123
As already stated, the 15" low end now is now the high end 15" MBP (with half the VRAM) from February. If this 15" was out in February, I wouldn't have gone with the high end MBP. It's okay though, I'm very happy with my MBP.
 

RevToTheRedline

macrumors 6502a
Sep 27, 2007
581
154
Still no 1440x900 display on the Macbook Pro 13", one aspect of the Air that's technically superior. I was hoping to see that addition on the latest revision.

I do like the 1GB graphics bump on the 15 and 17" though.


Well hopefully by the time I add a Macbook to my Apple family they will have the Air 13 or Pro 13" in Quad Core option. I'd also like to see 8GB RAM option for the Air one day. But it's getting to the point of interesting me into purchase.
 

gnasher729

Suspended
Nov 25, 2005
17,980
5,565
To hell with this update because the graphics on the 13 inch models sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Intel HD 3000 is garbage!
I'll keep my late 2008 13 inch Al macbook thank you. Nvidia rocks!

What exactly do you do where the HD 3000 makes any difference whatsoever to you?
 

Kendo

macrumors 68020
Apr 4, 2011
2,275
760
This is a fine update. Not only did they upgrade the CPU, they upgraded the HDD size and GPU as well. Couldn't ask for more (besides a redesign). :D

Hopefully this means they will do the same with the iMac refresh in regards to HDD size. The base iMac had a 500GB HDD since the first release back in 2009 and hasn't change since.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.