I stopped reading atWirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)
I stopped reading at
Cnet reports...
GSPice
j/k
I stopped reading atWirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)
I stopped reading at
Cnet reports...
GSPice
Old timers might not like it, but Mac OSX's life is now limited.
ARM doesn't have a true 64 bit CPU design out to build. ARMv8 is not out yet.
Here's all the information you need to know: in just 5 years of iOS (under 2 with the PC successor, the iPad), iOS devices now make up 72% of Apple's earnings as of last quarter.
... and the graph is on a sharp uphill climb. In another year, it's predicted that that number will breach 80%. When 8 out of 10 of your customers are buying an iOS device, when does it make sense to continue supporting the remaining 2 customers? In another 5 years, it'll be under 1 customer per 10.
If you kept reading you'd see it came straight from Tim Cook's mouth.Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)
I stopped reading at
It doesn't make much sense to lose at least 20% of your earnings, either.
It doesn't make much sense to lose at least 20% of your earnings, either.
iOS = touchscreen. OS X = mouse and keyboard.
I don't know why we have these persistent debates about OS X merging with iOS, and hybrid touchscreen devices capable of running Mac software. That is Microsoft's approach, not Apple's! Apple understood that a device which tries to do everything, ends up not doing anything particularly well, and ends up adding complexity (for both developers and users) rather than reducing it. So they designed a UI specifically for a touchscreen device. I'd say they've done rather well with this approach.
You're suggesting Apple needs to copy Microsoft's approach, the one that's been failing for years to bring a user-friendly tablet to market, to ensure they do well in the market they already dominate? That doesn't make much sense to me.
If you kept reading you'd see it came straight from Tim Cook's mouth.
Well not all of the 20% is Macs, there are iPod's and revenue from iTunes in there too. I mean is it unrealistic to say that less than 5% of Apple's revenue will come from Macs/OSX in 5 years? Not at all.
So where does that leave the Mac in the next 10 years?
10 years? I doubt Apple will still be in the business of selling Macs in 5 years, at the rate iOS devices are growing.
You missed the part where I mentioned that the graph is on a sharp uphill climb. In 1 year (possibly less), Apple will be making +/- 80% of its earnings on iOS. That's just one year. By mid decade, that number is very clearly going to be even higher. 88% to 90% in 2013. By 2015, Mac sales will be insignificant to Apple's bottom line. Will they continue to support it? I believe so, but with a much more minimal product line.
I anticipate a desk iOS flat panel taking the place of the iMac in under 2 years. The Mac Pro has nowhere to go but down so this iOS device on the high end will probably take its place as well. Mac Mini's niche has always been the starter customer. It was introduced as Apple's trojan horse to win over Windows users but the Windows VS Mac fight is all but done. A low end user will find all their needs met with an iPad at a lower price point than a Mac Mini.
What remains are those in the notebook line. If Intel's product map is any indication, we'll continue to see a more powerful MacBookAir that will blur the lines near the MacBookPro. Whatever this melds into will be the single device that is the final frontier for Mac OSX.
For the record, I'm also an "old timer" who loves the Mac and don't relish its demise but I won't cling to the past. I'm not cheerleading these changes, merely pointing out what appears obvious once you analyze the available data and trends.
For single-threaded performance, on certain kinds of workloads, th fastest Power 7 will out-peform the fastest Sandy Bridge, but not by any spectacular margin, and for most applications, the extra expense (hardware and electricity) just is not worth it.
10 years? I doubt Apple will still be in the business of selling Macs in 5 years, at the rate iOS devices are growing.
Face it - for most of the stuff people do with computers, tablets are a fundamentally superior solution. Browsing, watching YouTube, updating Facebook - all best done from an iPad (or an iPhone, which is with you literally everywhere).
Desktop and even laptop PCs are only going to be really needed by business people, and even then only at the office. In fact, I'm not even sure most of them will need a PC - if the iPhone gains the ability to dock and work with external monitors and keyboards, it could function as your desktop PC as well (and as your laptop, with a mobile dock equipped with a keyboard, monitor and larger battery).
Any processing job the mobile device can't handle will simply be offloaded to the cloud, OnLive style. That's already practical in most offices, with their high-speed networks and fat internet pipes. It'll become increasingly practical in the home as well over the next decade.
The PC and laptop as we've grown to know them are as obsolete as the buggywhip. Apple won't be making an ARM-based MacBook because by the time that becomes worth the hassle, they won't be making desktop and laptop computers anymore. The form factors are totally obsolete.
Here's all the information you need to know: in just 5 years of iOS (under 2 with the PC successor, the iPad), iOS devices now make up 72% of Apple's earnings as of last quarter.
... and the graph is on a sharp uphill climb. In another year, it's predicted that that number will breach 80%. When 8 out of 10 of your customers are buying an iOS device, when does it make sense to continue supporting the remaining 2 customers? In another 5 years, it'll be under half of 1 customer per 10.
Think of which jobs today can replace a notebook or desktop with an iPad or iPhone: Retail, Mobile sales agents (real estate, pharmaceutical, etc), educators, medical professionals, are just a few I can think of right away. Add in all the jobs that don't require a computer at all, and this represents a significant portion of all jobs. All that remain are niche professionals such as engineers, writers and multimedia content creators.
Writers can easily solve their issue with the addition of a full keyboard. Engineers, Video, photo and audio professionals are those who still need a Mac/PC but some of those are already being addressed.
All you've got left are the manufacturing industry. You won't see iPads running a production line but then again, it's unlikely that you'll have seen a Mac doing that job anyway. These are highly specialized fields that will have customized computers doing the job.
So where does that leave the Mac in the next 10 years?
10 years? I doubt Apple will still be in the business of selling Macs in 5 years, at the rate iOS devices are growing.
Face it - for most of the stuff people do with computers, tablets are a fundamentally superior solution. Browsing, watching YouTube, updating Facebook - all best done from an iPad (or an iPhone, which is with you literally everywhere).
Desktop and even laptop PCs are only going to be really needed by business people, and even then only at the office. In fact, I'm not even sure most of them will need a PC - if the iPhone gains the ability to dock and work with external monitors and keyboards, it could function as your desktop PC as well (and as your laptop, with a mobile dock equipped with a keyboard, monitor and larger battery).
Any processing job the mobile device can't handle will simply be offloaded to the cloud, OnLive style. That's already practical in most offices, with their high-speed networks and fat internet pipes. It'll become increasingly practical in the home as well over the next decade.
The PC and laptop as we've grown to know them are as obsolete as the buggywhip. Apple won't be making an ARM-based MacBook because by the time that becomes worth the hassle, they won't be making desktop and laptop computers anymore. The form factors are totally obsolete.
If what you say is true, then what are app developers going to use to develop apps?
Yeah I don't really see it happening because It would mean Apple would have to add support for ARM Processors..
And while I can't say for sure I just don't think they will capable of powering an operating system like Mac OSX Lion with ARM Processors..
The only benefit I can see is better battery life..
If what you say is true, then what are app developers going to use to develop apps?
Because the Mac business is still VERY profitable, and not all business decisions have to come down to laziness