The original blog post over at iLab points out the possibility that this may have been a test panel from Sharp that didn't pass Apple's standards, citing the widely circulated report out of Korea saying that Sharp was out.
Immediately following that, they point to not as circuated rumour on a blog site which pretty much says the exact opposite: that LG display had difficulties and that Sharp may have recieved the bulk of iPad orders. ( http://ipad2japan.blog60.fc2.com/?tag=iPad3%C8%AF%C7%E4 )
Either way, we'll know soon enough - as iLab points out, the mere existance of an iPad-sized panel doesn't rule out or confirm Sharp as an iPad display supplier.
Whoever made the first batch of iPad1 displays did a great job, compared to the company that made the subsequent batches. There was a screen quality degradation after the initial batch.
And I have noticed that the same thing happened to the iPad 2.
Degradation in what sense? The display's color temperature was different.
- The original displays had a nice white backlight with great contrast.
- The newer displays had a different color temperature with yellowish white backlight. It was in the whole display, not just the edges as with the issue with the glue on the iPad 2.
So, for the iPad 3, I'm getting mine in the first batch just in case.