Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Mar 18, 2012, 08:15 PM   #1
kallisti
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
2012 cruise pics

Just got back from a vacation and wanted to share some pics. C&C welcome.













__________________
To the prettiest one.

Last edited by kallisti; Mar 18, 2012 at 09:12 PM.
kallisti is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2012, 01:42 AM   #2
miles01110
macrumors 604
 
miles01110's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Ivory Tower (I'm not coming down)
None of them really catch my eye, honestly.
__________________
Got a problem? Check here first.
miles01110 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2012, 01:49 AM   #3
flosseR
macrumors 6502a
 
flosseR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: the cold dark north
Send a message via MSN to flosseR
nice.. but they seem like tourist pics... then again, any picture that invokes nice memories is worth keeping. Number 3 would be the best of the lot if you could clone out the line in the top left corner..
__________________
Nikon D-800 , 24-70G, 85 f1.8,100-300 F4,SB-900 and SB-800 and 2 Yongnuo 560s, 100mbit fiber to my house UNCAPPED!
FriedFishStick.com home of my new project
flosseR is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2012, 02:07 AM   #4
mulo
macrumors 68020
 
mulo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Behind you
Send a message via MSN to mulo
+1 on number three, although I think a 16:9 crop might do it good.
__________________
iPhone 5 Black 64GB.
17" MBP 2.2GHz i7, 16GB RAM.
Canon 7D + grip, 24-70mm f/2.8L USM, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM.
mulo is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2012, 04:18 PM   #5
kallisti
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Hmmm. So it's more an issue of uninspired subject matter and less technique? Or was there something I could have done at the time of capture to make them more interesting images?

I'm honestly asking here.
__________________
To the prettiest one.
kallisti is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2012, 04:22 PM   #6
miles01110
macrumors 604
 
miles01110's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Ivory Tower (I'm not coming down)
Uninspired subjects are part of it; it's just not clear why anyone should care about cruise ship chairs or railings. I don't see a whole lot of evidence of any "technique" issues good or bad. I don't really see anything more complicated than autofocus in any of the images either, so maybe I'm not the best judge.
__________________
Got a problem? Check here first.
miles01110 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2012, 06:30 PM   #7
kallisti
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by miles01110 View Post
Uninspired subjects are part of it; it's just not clear why anyone should care about cruise ship chairs or railings. I don't see a whole lot of evidence of any "technique" issues good or bad. I don't really see anything more complicated than autofocus in any of the images either, so maybe I'm not the best judge.
No one should care about cruise ship chairs or railings. But by the same token, no one should care about a basket of fruit either--yet there are too numerous to count paintings in countless museums with subjects that are "blah" to say the least. It isn't always the subject, it's what you do with it. I'm not about to argue though that I did anything in these shots to make the subjects "shine." My failing.

The autofocus question is kind of interesting. I shot all of these with a rangefinder camera with manual focus. One of the things I've loved about using a rangefinder is that it has forced me to learn (and pay attention to) more of the "nitty-gritty" elements than I ever had to do with a DSLR. Sometimes I focus with the viewfinder. Sometimes I focus with the depth-of-field scale on the lens. I'm much more cognizant of the aperture I am using and I have to think more about which elements of the image I want to be in focus more than I ever bothered with previously. The same principles apply to a DSLR obviously, but it wasn't until I started shooting with a rangefinder that they really *clicked* for me. I may miss the mark at times (and clearly you feel I did in at least one image), but having to really think about focus, depth-of-field, and their relationship to aperture on every single shot has been an invaluable learning experience. I can only hope that I get better as I shoot more and gain more experience. And that I will be able to apply the lessons when I shoot with a DSLR.
__________________
To the prettiest one.
kallisti is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2012, 06:31 PM   #8
Grey Beard
macrumors 6502a
 
Grey Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Antipodes.
Send a message via AIM to Grey Beard
Quote:
Originally Posted by miles01110 View Post
I don't really see anything more complicated than autofocus in any of the images either, so maybe I'm not the best judge.
If I recall correctly the OP usually shoots with a Leica M9 and as such there is no auto focus, just wind the lens thingie.

KGB
__________________
I am what I am.
Grey Beard is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2012, 06:41 AM   #9
sim667
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Can I just ask, Cruises must be really boring no?
__________________
Mac Pro, Macbook Pro, G4 Powerbook, iPad 4, iPhone 5, 2X TV, Nikon D200, ACSP Trained - Photography and Mac tech
Music and UK festival Blog
sim667 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2012, 09:31 AM   #10
chrono1081
macrumors 604
 
chrono1081's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Isla Nublar
Here is some CC OP (Sorry if this is not welcome, I usually don't offer CC unless its specifically asked for but since one of your posts seemed to ask for it I figured I'd offer )

Pic 1 - I love the sun and the colors on the water, although the water is slightly underexposed you'd be hard pressed to get this shot without that happening due to the brightness of the sun. The only thing that ruins it for me is the rail in the way.

If it was possible to get above the rail and only include a small part of it it would work or just stick the camera through the rail and just get an ocean/sky shot. (This leaves out a foreground element but in this case I think it would be better than including the rail).

Pic 2 - I like the look of this one, but something about it just isn't visually interesting to me. Maybe if there was a tighter crop by taking some off the top and some off the bottom it would improve the look. This one really needs some sort of defined subject (I can't tell if the subject is the cloud, the reflection on the water, or the ship windows).

Pic 3 - This one looks more like a shot of the window. Again, I can't really tell what the subject is. If it is the architectural piece itself the base should be included. In the picture and you should try and get a wider shot of it if possible, whatever the structure is sitting on is cut off. If the reelections are the focus I'd say zoom in on them and fill the screen with them.

Pic 4: This shot has a boring feel to it (thats not an insult, I'll explain). What I mean is the water and the sky are at equal parts, each taking up half of the screen. This usually doesn't fair well for landscape shots, they often look better with the focus (either the ground or sky) being 2/3rds of the scene. This scene would probably be improved by cropping so that 2/3rds of the shot was water and 1/3 the sky. Its also a bit underexposed but thats going to be hard to compensate for without something like a ND filter.

Pic 5: This pic lacks a clear subject. I also can't really tell what I'm looking at :/

Pic 6: Again, this one lacks a clear subject. If you were going for abstract, I'd suggest steer clear of it. Its very rare to see a good abstract shot, most are boring, uninspired crap (the kind you were hinting about in your post that you see in museums )

Pic 7: You did a good job with leading lines unto the scene, but the subject they lead to (the man) is blurred out and looks like maybe he wasn't supposed to be there. You had the right idea though in this pic it seems with lines that lead the viewers eye.

I hope the above made sense. I'm a bit sleep deprived and delirious at the moment
__________________
Mac Pro (2010): 3.33Ghz Intel Xeon (6 core) - 24 GB RAM - NVidia Quadro k5000
Macbook Air (2010): 2.13 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo - 4GB RAM
chrono1081 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2012, 05:57 PM   #11
kallisti
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrono1081 View Post
Here is some CC OP (Sorry if this is not welcome, I usually don't offer CC unless its specifically asked for but since one of your posts seemed to ask for it I figured I'd offer )

Pic 1 - I love the sun and the colors on the water, although the water is slightly underexposed you'd be hard pressed to get this shot without that happening due to the brightness of the sun. The only thing that ruins it for me is the rail in the way.

If it was possible to get above the rail and only include a small part of it it would work or just stick the camera through the rail and just get an ocean/sky shot. (This leaves out a foreground element but in this case I think it would be better than including the rail).

Pic 2 - I like the look of this one, but something about it just isn't visually interesting to me. Maybe if there was a tighter crop by taking some off the top and some off the bottom it would improve the look. This one really needs some sort of defined subject (I can't tell if the subject is the cloud, the reflection on the water, or the ship windows).

Pic 3 - This one looks more like a shot of the window. Again, I can't really tell what the subject is. If it is the architectural piece itself the base should be included. In the picture and you should try and get a wider shot of it if possible, whatever the structure is sitting on is cut off. If the reelections are the focus I'd say zoom in on them and fill the screen with them.

Pic 4: This shot has a boring feel to it (thats not an insult, I'll explain). What I mean is the water and the sky are at equal parts, each taking up half of the screen. This usually doesn't fair well for landscape shots, they often look better with the focus (either the ground or sky) being 2/3rds of the scene. This scene would probably be improved by cropping so that 2/3rds of the shot was water and 1/3 the sky. Its also a bit underexposed but thats going to be hard to compensate for without something like a ND filter.

Pic 5: This pic lacks a clear subject. I also can't really tell what I'm looking at :/

Pic 6: Again, this one lacks a clear subject. If you were going for abstract, I'd suggest steer clear of it. Its very rare to see a good abstract shot, most are boring, uninspired crap (the kind you were hinting about in your post that you see in museums )

Pic 7: You did a good job with leading lines unto the scene, but the subject they lead to (the man) is blurred out and looks like maybe he wasn't supposed to be there. You had the right idea though in this pic it seems with lines that lead the viewers eye.

I hope the above made sense. I'm a bit sleep deprived and delirious at the moment
Thank you for the comments. They are very welcome. I feel a little bad about this thread as it is very selfish--I should have posted the pics individually in the Photo of The Day thread, but I really wanted feedback and probably wouldn't have gotten it there.

Pic 1. When I shot it, I wasn't sure if the railing was going to be a good thing or a bad thing. So I hedged my bets.



I ended up choosing the shot with the railing included, but this may have been an error in judgement.

Pic 2. I hear you on this. It doesn't have a defined subject. But for some reason it works for me. It's actually my favorite out of the bunch. Possible that speaks negatively about my taste.

Pic 3. I'm a bit divided on this one and it shows. On one hand I like the curves of the architecture. On the other it was really about the reflections on the window. My own indecision about what was interesting in the scene shines through in the image. Should have picked one or the other and gone with it.

Pic 4. I broke the cardinal rule of thirds on this one. You are quite right that splitting the image in half creates "stress" when viewing it. My thought was that the sun drew the eye upwards and somewhat negated having the horizon in the middle of the image. I may have erred with this assumption. I used a linear polarizing filter as a ghetto ND filter. For comparison, here is a similar image I shot 2 years earlier with a Nikon D700 and split ND filter:



Pic 5. Probably the weakest of all the images. Was playing with using the sun in images. I like parts of the image but agree that it doesn't really work as presented. Perhaps this works slightly better?



Pic 6. Was thinking about leading lines when I shot this, though they don't really lead anywhere. I agree that abstracts are really in the eye of the beholder and more often than not don't work.

Pic 7. This was all about leading lines for me. I loved the curve of the row of deck chairs when I saw them. This is the image I have the most regrets about in hindsight. I wasn't sure if the image was best served with having everything in focus or just some elements in the foreground. I wasn't sure if it would be more interesting with some people in it or devoid of people. I wish I had come back to this spot and shot it with different depths-of-field and with/without people. Meh.
__________________
To the prettiest one.
kallisti is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2012, 06:30 PM   #12
Ruahrc
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
To me most just lack interest or a strong subject. #s 1, 2, 4, and 5 all are like this.

#3 has potential (interesting colors/shapes in the reflection) but there is too much extraneous noise (i.e. the ladder). Further abstraction of the scene may have helped. Maybe some judicious cropping would improve this one?

#6 has some potential for the complimentary colors and somewhat abstract shapes, but the badly crooked horizon and poor exposure on the background detract.

#7 I actually like the most of this bunch. The leading lines theme is there, I think the main issue is that is suffers from "standing man's syndrome" where the photo is made "ordinary" because it was taken with the camera at eye level. This makes for a very "common" perspective on the scene. Compositions can often be made stronger or more interesting by putting the camera in perspectives not normally seen by the eyes. This is especially common with tripod photography, where most people just unfold their tripod all the way, choosing a tripod height based on shooting convenience and not deciding based on optimum camera positioning.

Ruahrc
Ruahrc is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2012, 07:28 PM   #13
srf4real
macrumors 68030
 
srf4real's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: paradise beach FL
Number two appeals to me. I find it interesting and well framed, plus the sunbeams through the clouds and the stepped reflections help set it off for me. But I'm no expert..

The people in the last shot 7 totally ruin anything artistic I may have seen within it. (And the surveillance camera!) Clone out maybe? And yes my eyes are begging to see the far focal point in focus! My eye was drawn there only to be disappointed.


I think you'd have gotten better reception were cruise ships not so 'passe' with the "in crowd"... thanks for putting them up tho, takes courage to ask for sincere critique. Kudos
__________________
iSurf. For real.

Last edited by srf4real; Mar 20, 2012 at 07:36 PM.
srf4real is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2012, 07:53 PM   #14
ChrisA
macrumors G4
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redondo Beach, California
Quote:
Originally Posted by miles01110 View Post
None of them really catch my eye, honestly.

#3, the reflections in the window would be good if you crop of the bottom.

Some of the others too. Remove anything that does not contribute to the main idea. Some times you can fix an image by cropping it so it follows "rule of thirds" The other trick is to vignet it to but not so much as to make it obvious, keep it not easy to spotvisable, The eye will be drawn to the bright area

The trick with post processing is to forget about the trip and the people in the shots and think only abot lines, mass, color and shape. Some people say to turn the photos upside down when to process them so you think more about form then content. It might work
ChrisA is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2012, 01:08 PM   #15
jbg232
macrumors 65816
 
jbg232's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
As with the others, unfortunately they are on the whole, unimpressive in that they don't "wow" me. Your modified shot of shot #1 would be a decent landscape photo if you had a neutral density filter to increase the exposure of the water, as getting exposure to be dramatic and "correct" in that setting is nearly impossible given the stark contrasts of the water and sky brightnesses. The only way to get better is to keep taking photos so I think we would all encourage you to keep on showing us what you've got.

For your next cruise, maybe some macros of interesting piping/machinery or just plain old items (deck of cards, flowers, water glasses, watches, etc etc) with some light manipulation as you'll probably have more free time to experiment with those things than you usually do when you're not on vacation.

Remember this cardinal rule - Light = photography. Your photos are not dramatic because the light is way to diffuse for the most part.
__________________
iMac | MacBook | iPad | iPhone | Apple TV
5D Mark III | 24-105L | 100-400L | 50 f/1.4 | 50 f/2.8 Macro
jbg232 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2012, 02:03 PM   #16
Designer Dale
macrumors 68040
 
Designer Dale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Folding space
Quote:
Originally Posted by kallisti View Post
Thank you for the comments. They are very welcome. I feel a little bad about this thread as it is very selfish--I should have posted the pics individually in the Photo of The Day thread, but I really wanted feedback and probably wouldn't have gotten it there.

Pic 1. When I shot it, I wasn't sure if the railing was going to be a good thing or a bad thing. So I hedged my bets.

Thumb resize.

I ended up choosing the shot with the railing included, but this may have been an error in judgement.
/clipped/
I like this shot a lot better than the one framed with the railing, but I would like to see a little more detail in the shadows. Not a lot, just a bit without blowing the highlights out more.

Posting these in a single comment thread isn't selfish and it will generate more comments. Since you've been around for a while you understand that some won't be flattering...

I took a cruise to Mexico in 1988 or so and it was a truly forgettable experience, especially from a photographic point of view. Cabo San Lucas was the exception, but the sea was so rough we couldn't get off the boat. At least you didn't get one of those horrible illnesses or wind up at the bottom of the Mediterranean...

Dale
__________________
How to Post, Quote and Multi-Quote Photos - My Google Docs Folder 12/2011
I'm out of my mind, but feel free to leave a message.
Designer Dale is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2012, 02:38 PM   #17
Phrasikleia
macrumors 68040
 
Phrasikleia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Over there------->
I'll just chime in with the most basic advice I like to give: that most really compelling photographs have a clear sense of hierarchy--a primary point of visual interest, often one that 'reads' as a subject within a setting, or at least a point that seems to give the photo a sense of closure. There are exceptions, of course, but they are rare.
__________________
Photography by Phrasikleia
Phrasikleia is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2012, 03:47 PM   #18
kallisti
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Firstly I want to say how much I appreciate all of the comments. As Dale said, I've been around here long enough that I wasn't expecting or hoping for high-praise. Honestly, that won't make me a better photographer. I'd rather hear the negative stuff, with the hope that the next time I'm in a similar shooting situation I'll create something better/more interesting.

I tweaked number 1 to bring out the shadows more. Better?



Also, for #6 I was thinking about extraneous elements when I shot it and made an adjustment to the composition after the initial shot.



The final image may still not be interesting, but I was actually thinking when I shot it

Once again, I really really appreciate all the comments. I'm not offended by anything anyone has said. Hearing that the images don't work for people (with explanations as to why) is really quite valuable. Thanks to you all
__________________
To the prettiest one.
kallisti is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2012, 02:58 PM   #19
BJMRamage
macrumors 65816
 
BJMRamage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
these remind me of shots I have from a Cruise.

I took lots and LOTS of photos all over. "ohh artistic" "neat shapes" "cool lines"

but I would honestly say 5-10 are probably any good (of mine) thinking back after looking at yours.

I see yours as something you thought was neat when you took the shot...obviously...be it shadows/lines/textures/etc....but that upon looking them over now more just "ehh" nothing outstanding, nothing WOW, but nice snapshots.

These aren't horrible but they don't have that eye-opening feel as some Great shots will. The few who have reviewed these on a shot-by-shot basis offer good words. and in the age of digital, shoot away and learn from it. For these i see them as more a memory thing...bringing back great memories but not necessarily the Golden Ticket.


make any sense?
BJMRamage is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Your perfect 2012 MacBook Pro? falcor87 MacBook Pro 192 May 23, 2012 02:45 PM
2011 MacBook Pro or 2012 MacBook Pro? MJNBGA MacBook Pro 68 Feb 18, 2012 10:21 PM
Western Caribbean Cruise with Nikon. Advice? Waybo Digital Photography 16 Apr 5, 2011 11:23 AM
The Road to the 2012 London Olympics Thread leomac08 Community Discussion 26 Apr 4, 2011 05:50 PM
2012 Republican Presidential Nominee Sky Blue Politics, Religion, Social Issues 51 Nov 22, 2010 08:30 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC