Why in the world would you upgrade a computer?
I have owned numerous PCs and Macs and never in my life have I upgraded a computer (other than adding RAM). People love to tout the "upgradability" of PCs, but in reality, by the time you want to upgrade the video card (or some other component other than RAM), you really need a new motherboard, but then you need new faster RAM to take advantage of it, oh and while you're at it, you may as well get the new processor, and, and...oh, you just bought a new computer.
It's always better to just buy the new model and get ALL the technology improvements at once. Considering the high resale value of Macs, its cost effective too.
And I still don't understand why Apples with out-of-date components have resale value. Sheeple who can't afford new?
First yes I am, second that is not what the post was about. Mac Pro are professional machines which right now run up to 12 cores with 64 gig for 12 grand, that is not a lot of money for a Professional, let me spell it again Professional not McD unless you own a McD which why you would want one is well up to you, but you will pay for bragging rights.
The biggest argument for "upgrading" a computer isn't what you might want to do a few years later - but what you want to have on day 1.
I'll agree with your premise that "2nd/3rd year" upgrades are fairly rare.
That is the limitation of the all-in-one design, not just the iMac. Apple is not the only one who makes all-in-one desktops. So that argument could really be applied to an HP or Dell all-in-one. All-in-one's are not supposed to be easily upgradable, towers are. So you are comparing two very unlike terms. Considering multiple companies make all-in-one desktops, I do not know why you felt like singling out Apple.
That's a sh-t ton of money for a professional...especially freelancers. That type of machine is probably used by 2% of the industry out there.
The rest of us mid-high level professionals are not going to drop that much on a machine, even a Mac-Pro tower.
I work at one of the biggest post-houses on the east coast and I can tell you that we'd never blow that much on a PC/MAC.
That's a sh-t ton of money for a professional...especially freelancers. That type of machine is probably used by 2% of the industry out there.
The rest of us mid-high level professionals are not going to drop that much on a machine, even a Mac-Pro tower.
I work at one of the biggest post-houses on the east coast and I can tell you that we'd never blow that much on a PC/MAC.
I'd like to see the iMac be a computer that makes the front pages of magazines again. I absolutely love my 27" i7 iMac, but it's going on 4 years now (I think). It's been so good to me that I probably won't need to replace it for another 2-3 years.. unless Apple does something drastic.
I mocked something up. It's an iMac with an easel screen. I'd like to see Apple explore more of touch on the desktop with OSXI (11) and I think this is along the right lines. It would be cool if the screen could go not just to easel position, but also level out horizontally to be like the MS Surface. I'd also like to see a touchscreen keyboard. Many of us have gotten used to typing on a touch screen and it would be great to have the keyboard change based on software... Imagine having the keyboard change themes based on games or applications... it would also be great to remove the dock and have the launcher on the keyboard. Maybe I got it wrong.. it might make more sense along the top of the keyboard, but the launcher makes more sense on the keyboard for me either way.
Please excuse the wonky top black bezel area (where the camera would be). I know it's not drawn straight... I'll fix it later.
Image
Exactly.
Still curious to see what happened to the 35W quad cores...something tells me they're going to sneak in at the last second.
That is the limitation of the all-in-one design, not just the iMac. Apple is not the only one who makes all-in-one desktops. So that argument could really be applied to an HP or Dell all-in-one. All-in-one's are not supposed to be easily upgradable, towers are. So you are comparing two very unlike terms. Considering multiple companies make all-in-one desktops, I do not know why you felt like singling out Apple.
Apple is not the only computer manufacturer that build all-in-one computers but they are the only one that do not build regular desktop computers (apart from niche models like Mini and Pro).
I'd like to see the iMac be a computer that makes the front pages of magazines again. I absolutely love my 27" i7 iMac, but it's going on 4 years now (I think). It's been so good to me that I probably won't need to replace it for another 2-3 years.. unless Apple does something drastic.
I mocked something up. It's an iMac with an easel screen. I'd like to see Apple explore more of touch on the desktop with OSXI (11) and I think this is along the right lines. It would be cool if the screen could go not just to easel position, but also level out horizontally to be like the MS Surface. I'd also like to see a touchscreen keyboard. Many of us have gotten used to typing on a touch screen and it would be great to have the keyboard change based on software... Imagine having the keyboard change themes based on games or applications... it would also be great to remove the dock and have the launcher on the keyboard. Maybe I got it wrong.. it might make more sense along the top of the keyboard, but the launcher makes more sense on the keyboard for me either way.
Please excuse the wonky top black bezel area (where the camera would be). I know it's not drawn straight... I'll fix it later.
Image
At this stage in the history I would. Anyway they are not working on touch of os x now and they won't in a long time. At least if they could make the new imacs more ergonomic and less the same old boring years old design with countless bs ads by Ivy talking about how calm and minimal the (same old) design is, Ivy btw who is more and more becoming some arcane bs marketing speaker and instead of a designer...no wonder he wanted to quit a while back...Excellent idea, though I suppose it's a few years down the line yet, not that I'd put it past apple to radically redraw the boundaries so quickly.
I like my Macbook Pro. But I sold my 2011 iMac and built my own PC with the money I got from it. It is a lot more powerful, and upgradeable, as desktop computers should be. I feel like the iMac is a large notebook, and will continue that way. Before all the haters vote this down, think about this in regards to the iMac: The hard drive is not user replaceable, and besides the RAM, nothing is replaceable or upgradeable. So, here is my huge "no thanks" to Apple and the iMac.
Apple will eventually not let you replace RAM either. I bet they will integrate it on the motherboards on the iMac as well. Will suck big time.
As far as I can tell it's working out quite well for them.
Did someone say.............. "Hackintosh" ?
Why in the world would you upgrade a computer? I have owned numerous PCs and Macs and never in my life have I upgraded a computer (other than adding RAM). People love to tout the "upgradability" of PCs, but in reality, by the time you want to upgrade the video card (or some other component other than RAM), you really need a new motherboard, but then you need new faster RAM to take advantage of it, oh and while you're at it, you may as well get the new processor, and, and...oh, you just bought a new computer.
It's always better to just buy the new model and get ALL the technology improvements at once. Considering the high resale value of Macs, its cost effective too.