Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,533
30,842



Amid swirling rumors of an imminent update for the 15-inch MacBook Pro driven by a claimed April 29 launch date for Intel's quad-core mobile Ivy Bridge processors, CPU World reports that benchmarking of one of the chips likely to appear in the new MacBook Pro shows fairly significant improvements in performance, particularly in graphics.

The chip being tested was the Core i7-3820QM, a 2.7 GHz processor with turbo speeds up to 3.7 GHz paired with Intel HD 4000 graphics. The chip is scheduled to debut with a price of $568 in high volume, and seems to be the natural successor to the Sandy Bridge Core i7-2860QM that is the current high-end processor for the 15-inch and 17-inch MacBook Pro, available as a build-to-order option.

mbp_lineup_early_2011.jpg



For benchmarking comparisons, the new Ivy Bridge Core i7-3820QM chip was pitted against a Sandy Bridge Core i7-2960XM, which is an even higher-performance "Extreme" chip than is available in the current MacBook Pro. Consequently, any performance increase between the current high-end MacBook Pro chip and this new Ivy Bridge chip would be even greater than outlined in the benchmarking comparison.

Overall, the 3820QM was found to score an average of 9% higher than the Extreme 2960XM chip, a modest improvement but one which should be significantly higher relative to the 2860QM chip from the current MacBook Pro. Taking into account a roughly 10% higher performance for the tested 2960XM Sandy Bridge processor compared to the 2860QM actually found in the current MacBook Pro, the new 3820QM Ivy Bridge processor should offer roughly 20% higher CPU performance than is currently available in the MacBook Pro.
Looking at the CPU performance, using a few tests, we can see how the reduced production process helps the performance for a number of standard tests. In 3DMark Vantage (Entry level preset), Ivy Bridge has a 10% performance improvement over Sandy Bridge for the CPU score, and 9% in the physics score. In Cinebench 11.5, the single thread test showed a performance boost of 4%, and the multi-threaded test gave an improvement of 10%. The performance boost in the Truecrypt 7.0a - AES test was 4%. Finally, using x264 HD Benchmark 4.0, test 1 showed a boost of 13%, and test 2 showed a boost of 11%.
Even more significant gains for the Ivy Bridge chip show up in graphics performance, where the Intel HD 4000 integrated graphics supplants the HD 3000 graphics found in the Sandy Bridge chips. According to the benchmarks, the new HD 4000 integrated graphics outperforms the current graphics by anywhere from 32% to 108% depending on the test.

Apple of course also includes a dedicated graphics chip in its larger MacBook Pro models, giving users the option of higher performance with the dedicated chip or increased battery life with the integrated graphics. And given that the HD 4000 integrated graphics does not yet approach the performance of dedicated chips, those looking for maximum performance will still want to take advantage of whichever dedicated graphics option Apple includes in updated MacBook Pro models.

But significant improvements to integrated graphics performance could show up as a benefit in a number of areas, including providing users with better performance even when opting for the battery-conserving graphics settings. Apple has also reportedly been considering using integrated graphics only in some of its mid-range MacBook Pro models, with the HD 4000 chip making it feasible for the company to drop the dedicated graphics chip on some of those models while still being able to offer acceptable graphics performance.

Finally, the HD 4000 graphics will offer a marked improvement for the 13-inch MacBook Pro, which is expected to debut in June when Intel rolls out its dual-core Ivy Bridge processors. The smaller 13-inch form factor requires that those models rely solely on integrated graphics, meaning that all users would see a significant boost from the current HD 3000 graphics to the new HD 4000 graphics.

Article Link: Updated MacBook Pro to See Significant Performance Boost with Ivy Bridge
 

robvas

macrumors 68040
Mar 29, 2009
3,240
629
USA
I wouldn't mind a 15" Pro with only the Intel HD 4000 graphics. I don't do any games or 3D programming, I'll take the extended battery life, less heat, and cheaper cost.
 

dmk1974

macrumors 68020
Sep 16, 2008
2,389
464
If this update is true, think they will update the Mac Mini as well at the same time? Typically they have similar specs as the base MacBook Pros.
 

Frankied22

macrumors 68000
Nov 24, 2010
1,779
583
That is seriously going to suck if they don't keep a dedicated graphic card in the 15" and 17". If that's the case I may be looking at a 13" MBA with a custom gaming pc.
 

AlphaAnt

macrumors regular
Sep 9, 2006
120
5
MD, USA
Blast! Looks like another generation of 13" MBPs without dedicated graphics!

Maybe I'll target a 15" instead...
 

Jobsian

macrumors 6502a
Jul 30, 2009
853
98
The big question for me is the fate of both MBP and MBA lines, to merge or not to merge? I've seen good arguments for both sides. It'd be a pity if they shrunk the thermal envelope beyond being able to take a quad-core CPU.
 

MrPhineas

macrumors newbie
Mar 22, 2012
14
0
What I'm asking for is a better resolution (maybe a Retina display) with the anti-glare option and an SSD as the default data storage device (with the optical drive removed). With the new processor and graphic card it shouldn't be complicated to make it work.
That's it. Easy.
 
Last edited:

outsidethebox

macrumors member
Jan 10, 2008
90
27
I've still got my 2006 15" 2.26 C2D, anyone have any idea what kind of processor performance boost (%) I'll likely get from the new 15" IB? If there is a 20% increase versus only the 2011 SB model, then I imagine it will be massive for me.
 

gotluck

macrumors 603
Dec 8, 2011
5,712
1,204
East Central Florida
With an included discrete card equals one badass computer

If any laptop manufacturer can offer realistically priced upgradable discrete graphics down the line, that would REALLY be a badass computer. The graphics card, particularly with macs, is the first to go obsolete.

I used to have a gaming laptop (well I still do, but it's largely useless with a mobility radeon 9700), now I stick to a desktop PC for upgradability since I don't need the mobility too much. I have my tablet for mobility :p
 

AppChat

macrumors regular
Mar 10, 2012
180
0
there wont be a RETINA display for a 15inch notebook. u know how much that would make everything smaller????

also. just spend 2 grand on the 2011 15inch. sell and buy 2012?
 

zzLZHzz

macrumors 6502
Mar 9, 2012
277
71
ready to jump from C2D to ivy bridge and it will definitely be a large performance increase for me.
 

Jaro65

macrumors 68040
Mar 27, 2009
3,822
926
Seattle, WA
I've still got my 2006 15" 2.26 C2D, anyone have any idea what kind of processor performance boost (%) I'll likely get from the new 15" IB? If there is a 20% increase versus only the 2011 SB model, then I imagine it will be massive for me.

Likely an approximately fivefold increase in overall performance for you.
 

Santabean2000

macrumors 68000
Nov 20, 2007
1,883
2,044
I still think the current coexisting MBA/MBP 13" situation will not survive the redesign. I also hope I'm wrong, (esp if the MBP gets dedicated graphics!).
 

Lone Deranger

macrumors 68000
Apr 23, 2006
1,895
2,138
Tokyo, Japan
Let's hope any update will introduce less heat/better cooling. The current quad core 15" MBP's run hot and noisy very quickly unfortunately.
 

MarkBubba

macrumors newbie
Feb 7, 2011
29
1
I live in my house.
This article doesn't mention the 17" MacBook Pro... I'm waiting impatiently with credit card in hand to upgrade my aging dual-core 2010 17" MacBook Pro to a new 2012 quad-core 17" MacBook Pro!!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.