Yep, same here.
Apple, I might have upgraded to Lion by now if you hadn't axed Rosetta.
Exactly. I do not need to upgrade my current Quark 6 software on 2 Macs and a Laptop.
So, in axing Rosseta Apple is telling me to pay for an additional 3 x Quark 9 licences for software I do not need, or lose out on planned future services. Also probably the ability to own and sync a future iPhone or iPad. I qualify this statement with the fact I had to upgrade from Tiger when I purchased my iPad.
I am not even clear if I can even upgrade from Quark 6.5 to 9 in any case, but paying £897 or £2397, is not an option for the basic usage we need this software.
You CAN technically run iCloud on SL or any other previous carnation, if they wanted you to.
There is NO argument for me to consider from any fan boys in Apple's defence, when you can run the latest version of iTunes 10.6.1 and iCloud on any old ropey PC running Windows XP. So please..., unless you or Apple are now telling me that Windows XP is a better and more powerful OS than Snow Leopard, Leopard, Tiger etc, save it.
Apple want to keep the millions of potential and prospective PC based iPhone/Pad/Pod users happy, but are content to screw over their loyal existing Mac community.
This is not what Apple was about when I 'switched' in 1996.... In fact it was Apple's unique selling point that all software was backwards compatible and in contrast it was Microsoft that was forcing premature upgrades to software and hardware.
Big unfunny joke.
Rant over...