Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
AT&T CEO's "Only Regret" is Offering Unlimited Data Packages
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
That grandfathering is unlimited in name only. With the throttling that slows your speed to dialup, it's pretty much the same thing as a pay plan.
What a greedy turd. Text messaging will be dead soon. Even without imessage there is whatsapp that works on all platforms I use with people not on iOS 5.
Thank you for saying this. Its this reason why our economy is in such poor shape. Big business and Wall Street are sucking the rest of this country dry with this mindset.
Yep, that's why AT&T better come up with their own solution. But will they? Not likely. At current LTE speeds Google voice is superb in quality over VOIP. Instead of try and develop a competitor to GV what AT&T will do is force you to buy a data plan with a voice plan. Rather than give you a good data plan with VOIP built-in and charge you a little more than a data plan alone, they will hold on to dear life to their antiquated model.
Again they are not thinking long term and they will be squeezed out of voice and text all-together in the not too distant future when their competitors offer DATA only packages.
And those criticisms always come from those who never bother to check said specs.
For example, Apple uses the same chips and chipsets as competitors for laptops. Well, they use a subset of chips that don't suck power and create ongodly amounts of heat. It's part of their design, not to have super loud fans running simply to check email or watch a video.
Apple's product update cycle is more old school, in that it's once or twice a year rather than throwing in whatever chip whenever, but that doesn't make them below spec, just sometimes 1 month late to the game.
For example, Apple is waiting on INTEL for the lower power chips next month, as Intel insists on issuing the power hog chips first. That's on Intel.
Once the updates happen, the fastest chips in the power class are available. And in the case of the iMac, there is always an option for the fastest chip available in that class, or in my iMac's case, a special "Extreme" chip faster than any other chip at the time it was built.
3 years later, that iMac is still doing what it needs to do for me...
But Apples not the one crying the blues either.
AT&T made plenty of money when they were the only fish in the pond with the iPhone. Now they have some competition and its poor me. Business changes everyday you either keep up and be dynamic or get left behind its no different if your selling hotdogs or or data.
There are entire industries out there that have been putting most of their research money into suppressing innovation to keep their current model profitable. Good examples of this are oil, health care and shipping.
Federal Express only kept going by having their CEO to go Vegas and he won about 100 to 1 on a nearly million dollar bet to make payroll and expand the company when his investment bankers were pulling the plug. Some of these bankers had deep connections with other delivery services that were forced to modernize after FedEx became success in their over the night business.
Hell, Dave Thomas of Wendy's had a dog of a time franchising his Wendy's hamburger chain and the computer integrated burger grill that they patented. Local fast food franchises baronies didn't want them in competing with their franchises.
Then there are the stores of Getty funding the Prohibitionist Movement not for moral reason but to make distillation of grain alcohol illegal so it would not compete with for the newly growing automobile business. Look at the Model-T and you'll see a switch on the dash to alter the spark plug timing to alternate between alcohol and petroleum.
There are even more.
It doesn't matter why people want it. All that matters is that people choose to pay for an unlimited plan and then discover that it wasn't unlimited.
yeah, I was a long ways away from requiring an unlimited dataplan over the edge network but I chose it anyhow. I knew they'd rescind the offer as soon as the platform matured and one could actual benefit from an unlimited plan. It was a no brainer
It's still confusing. You never have any idea how much data you'll consume doing anything on a smart phone. Click the weather map. How much? Who knows?
It's such a benefit to consumers to not have to worry about crazy overage charges. It's not like it was seriously mis-priced. While a few users use a lot the average overall is certainly below the 2-3GB level.
I have an iPad3 and since I bought on day 1, I've only used 1.5GB. This is over 2+ months now.
I have been an unlimited customer since the beginning and I'm an unabashed capitalist. Yet, his comments did piss me off and get me thinking about going Verizon again. Just pissing on loyalty here.
The minute he cancels my unlimited or tricks me out of it, I'm gone to Verizon. I have as much loyalty to him as he seems to have to me.
I keep hearing people defending Apple saying that in the US, a public company is supposed to do everything it legally can to maximize profits. (maybe this helps.. http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/q...bligated-to-maximize-profits-for-shareholders) ??
If you argued in favor of Apple doing sketchy stuff to lower their taxes (which Google and MS also do), then it's kinda hard to not agree with the CEO of AT&T isn't it?
You can't have it both ways guys; A company that does everything they can to maximize their profits, will not be able to do everything they can to minimize their customers' costs. (That would be a conflict of interest
)While I agree that in an ideal world, wireless companies should be selling unlimited broadband plans and competing on pricing (and perhaps their free features), that would be far less profitable for them. Of course, if people could shop Apples-to-Apples for an unlimited data plan for their phone (all else being the same), they'd want a lower price - and that'd kill every cell company's profit margins.
It was worse back in the day - but today mobile companies still make their plan pricing as confusing as possible for that exact reason.
+1. I wonder if Apple would have been so quick to develop iMessage if text messaging were more reasonably priced (i.e., included with voice).
My only regret was ever giving AT&T the benefit of the doubt in thinking that if we all shovel boatloads of money into their furnace, they'll actually spend it improving their network.
5 years later, still no coverage in any of the three areas I spend work in. Yet their famous coverage map has been colored bold orange the entire time.
The bait & switch of the unlimited plans was icing on the cake. Crooks.
5 years later, still no coverage in any of the three areas I spend work in. Yet their famous coverage map has been colored bold orange the entire time.
The bait & switch of the unlimited plans was icing on the cake. Crooks.
From the perspective of a cell company CEO, I can understand the anxiety about things like iMessage. From the perspective of a consumer, iMessage was a long overdue freedom from the unbelievable (and disproportionate) charges that cellular carriers require for text messaging.
However, I completely understand the unlimited data issue. The cost to move a GB over wireless infrastructure is always going to be substantially higher than the cost to move a GB over wired infrastructure. Cellular internet ≠ wired internet at home/work and I doubt it ever will (cellular technologies will improve, but so will our bandwidth demands).
Is $10/GB the right pricing? That's highly debatable. I just don't know. Is all you can eat data a sustainable model? I really, really doubt it. And if it's not sustainable, then it doesn't make sense - before, now or at any point in the future.
Too many people on these forums complaint about the loss of unlimited data, but I have never once seen a person include a detailed post of the actual costs incurred in building and maintaining cellular infrastructure for a given data load.
However, I completely understand the unlimited data issue. The cost to move a GB over wireless infrastructure is always going to be substantially higher than the cost to move a GB over wired infrastructure. Cellular internet ≠ wired internet at home/work and I doubt it ever will (cellular technologies will improve, but so will our bandwidth demands).
Is $10/GB the right pricing? That's highly debatable. I just don't know. Is all you can eat data a sustainable model? I really, really doubt it. And if it's not sustainable, then it doesn't make sense - before, now or at any point in the future.
Too many people on these forums complaint about the loss of unlimited data, but I have never once seen a person include a detailed post of the actual costs incurred in building and maintaining cellular infrastructure for a given data load.
Well, he's a corporate d*ck, so I dunno what you would expect. He's interested in providing the least amount of service for the most amount of money, and keeping costs low. So he's not going to improve infrastructure. He's going to throttle users... he surely wasn't going to keep unlimited data after adding millions of smartphone users with how crappy that network is.
And, for me, it didn't really matter that AT&T offered unlimited data. My data plan on both a separate wireless card and my iPhone was sporadic and slow at best. I spent hours per day with no connection or transfer rates measured in bytes (yeah, you read that right, bytes). I also spent hours on the phone on at least a half dozen occasions with AT&T reps, and after having me do the basics (restart, reinstall software, yadda yadda) they were happy to follow the script of sending me to the hardware manufacturer. (So AT&T, was it both my iPhone AND my wireless card that had the problem, or just your crappy network!?!)
I switched to Verizon when I upgraded to the 4S and while the service certainly is not as reliable as cable broadband, it is waaaaaay more reliable and faster than AT&T.
My experience with AT&T was simply horrible for data (it was about the same, maybe slightly worse, for voice compared to Verizon). I was never happier when exclusivity finally ended.
And, for me, it didn't really matter that AT&T offered unlimited data. My data plan on both a separate wireless card and my iPhone was sporadic and slow at best. I spent hours per day with no connection or transfer rates measured in bytes (yeah, you read that right, bytes). I also spent hours on the phone on at least a half dozen occasions with AT&T reps, and after having me do the basics (restart, reinstall software, yadda yadda) they were happy to follow the script of sending me to the hardware manufacturer. (So AT&T, was it both my iPhone AND my wireless card that had the problem, or just your crappy network!?!)
I switched to Verizon when I upgraded to the 4S and while the service certainly is not as reliable as cable broadband, it is waaaaaay more reliable and faster than AT&T.
My experience with AT&T was simply horrible for data (it was about the same, maybe slightly worse, for voice compared to Verizon). I was never happier when exclusivity finally ended.