Folks,
I am currently spending a lot of time evaluating these new 2012 MacBook Pros. Have been waiting for Ivy Bridge and Kepler for some time, and am quite pleased that Apple has included them so promptly.
There are a few outstanding questions which I have not been able to find answers to in reviews. Thus I am appealing to the forums here to see if I can crowdsource some data.
Some context:
The questions:
The theory:
To test, you will need three pieces of software. All are free, and commonly known.
The procedure is simply to get it as hot as you are comfortable with.
I look forward to responses, with data if you're able, or anecdotal experience if you're not.
Cheers,
Julian
I am currently spending a lot of time evaluating these new 2012 MacBook Pros. Have been waiting for Ivy Bridge and Kepler for some time, and am quite pleased that Apple has included them so promptly.
There are a few outstanding questions which I have not been able to find answers to in reviews. Thus I am appealing to the forums here to see if I can crowdsource some data.
Some context:
- Currently, the price of NAND is such that 256GB drives are reasonable (about $1/GB), while 512GB drives are prohibitively expensive (about $1.40/GB). This will change soon as the price of MLC NAND continues to fall. For the moment, 256GB is the sweet spot and the size I would prefer to buy.
- The 2.3GHz i7-3615QM is not that much slower than the 2.6GHz i7-3720QM. Single threaded applications see a roughly 8% difference, heavily threaded tasks are more around 4%. This is inconsequential for most tasks.
- Apple has played silly games with their models. It is impossible to get the 2.6GHz Retina MBP with a 256GB SSD for some reason. You can however, get the non-retina 2.6GHz MBP with the 256GB SSD.
The questions:
- Does the 2.3GHz Retina MBP run cooler than the 2.6GHz model?
- Does the 2.6GHz non-Retina MBP run cooler than the 2.6GHz Retina model?
The theory:
- Perhaps the slower CPU produces less heat. MacBooks and PowerBooks have gotten very toasty ever since they became metal many years ago. Even shaving 8 degrees of of this max temp would be quite welcome.
- Does the thicker form factor of the old-style Unibody MacBook Pro allow these internal components run cooler? I'm skeptical of this one, but it is worth testing.
To test, you will need three pieces of software. All are free, and commonly known.
- Temperature Monitor, to watch the temperatures.
- smcFanControl, to set the fan speeds.
- Cinebench R11.5, to stress test the machine.
The procedure is simply to get it as hot as you are comfortable with.
- Note that some of this software may not work properly on the new machines. They are generally quite similar to the previous generation notebooks, most things should work.
- Install and launch Temperature Monitor, it will ask you for your admin password to install some additional sensor drivers. This is optional, although useful. The preferred sensors to monitor are CPU A Temperature Diode and Graphics Processor Temperature Diode.
- Install and launch smcFanControl and set up a preset for maximum speed. This should be around 6,000RPM for most MacBook Pros. This software may also ask for an admin password, once again it is harmless.
- Duplicate the Cinebench R11.5 application within its folder, run both instances.
- In the first instance of Cinebench run the CPU test. In the second, run the GPU test.
- Loop these tests until you see a stable temperature in Temp Monitor for the CPU diode. On an Intel i5-520M I got to 100C before it stabilised.
I look forward to responses, with data if you're able, or anecdotal experience if you're not.
Cheers,
Julian