Looked at those pictures for the last few minutes....I don't see a difference.
It's hard to tell in the pictures, but IRL side by side there is a big difference.
Looked at those pictures for the last few minutes....I don't see a difference.
No-one else with the AUO panel?
Anyone have a comparison with these ones?
One of the 11" on display at my local apple store was the AUO, and it definitely looked the most washed out of all the models. I instantly could tell a huge difference.
Thanks, that's slightly depressing, I'm definitely going to take mine to a store now and see the extent of this myself.
Well I've decided to do a direct comparison when I bring mine to the store. I don't consider myself to be normally that fussy for minor variance but if the difference in quality really is a chasm then I'm going to ask for another, for the reasons you mention.To bad I have the AUO 11". I remember seeing an Air at BestBuy back about a year ago (2010 model) and thinking the screen looked great. I figured maybe I just "thought" it was a bit better than it actually was, comparing to what I have now. Now I am starting to believe my memory is accurate and that it was simply a samsung.
I have played around with the calibration for a long time, and I have gotten it better, but considering my memory, I doubt as good as the samsung. I can tell just from the pictures that the samsung has a wider gamut. Too bad at the time I bought this that I didn't know Apple was doing this; I would have returned it rather than played around with it.
I'm wanting to call Apple now and piss off at them, though I highly doubt that would get me anywhere.
I don't care what anyone says, my opinion is that Apple shouldn't be allowing for such variance in a specific line up. If it was the air compared to the pro, I wouldn't be complaining. I may would even not complain if the 13" air had a slightly better display. But as it is, someone paying $1500 for a 13" may get a lower quality display than somebody that payed for a bottom end 11". That is screwy if you ask me.
Id say my respect for Apple has dropped.
Well I've decided to do a direct comparison when I bring mine to the store. I don't consider myself to be normally that fussy for minor variance but if the difference in quality really is a chasm then I'm going to ask for another, for the reasons you mention.
A thought. Don't beat on me.
From reading a lot of the posts on this thread, it would appear that the problem could well be with the profile that OS X uses for the display rather than the display itself. It's calibrated for the Samsung.
Would it not be a good idea to pester Apple to provide profiles that are better suited to the LG or the AUO?
I was wondering the same thing. Would the Samsung display look as bad as the LG display with a different profile? I bet it would. Likewise, the LG looks pretty good with the profile optimized for it.
You do know calibrating with only eyes is fools game?
Yes, people setting up a screen so it appears the way they like it is such a waste of time.
If you dont know, let me tell you. Word "Calibration" doesnt have anything to do with "opinion" or "taste" or "like". Its a STANDARD. Its a set of rules and guidelines. Example, calibrated to 2.2 gamma and 6500K. You cannot calibrate a display for real just by using your eyes. Hardware calibrator calibrates the full grayscale ramp. If you dont know what im talking, please read up some!
You can start with this:
http://www.curtpalme.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10457
ioreg -lw0 | grep IODisplayEDID | sed "/[^<]*</s///" | xxd -p -r | strings -6
if you get something that starts with LP you have an LG
if you get something that starts with LT you have a samsung
if you get something else you have the rare AUO
for the SSD just go to about this mac---more info---system report----serial ATA----the samsung SSD ends with SM### and the toshiba ends with TS###
When you guys talk about "calibrating", are you only fiddling with the display settings -> calibration (which is useless anyways) or REALLY calibrating your display with hardware calibrator ?
You do know calibrating with only eyes is fools game?
I am confused. So which is the coveted screen now? In the 2011 model it was initially the Samsung panel, but then after a couple of weeks the tide turned and the LG owners started winning the battle when it was pronounced the most awesomest panel due to better display angles.
Of course, the mighty Samsung warriors felt foolish that they had spent the last couple of weeks celebrating, drinking and spending their rewards of the battle on loose women and replacing their laptops until they got a Samsung panel and Samsung SSD, instead of preparing for this surprise rear attack by the untrustworthy LG barbarians.
Can someone unequivocally tell me which panel is considered to be the most awesomest and bestest screen in the 2012 MBA?