R Radiating macrumors 65816 Original poster Oct 12, 2012 #1 How does the battery life compare between the 1.8ghz and 2.0 ghz versions?
T TomCat macrumors member Oct 12, 2012 #2 That issue is a little cloudy, due to the fact that Mt. Lion 10.8 and possibly 10.8.1 seemed to eat more battery, which seems to be fixed in 10.8.2.
That issue is a little cloudy, due to the fact that Mt. Lion 10.8 and possibly 10.8.1 seemed to eat more battery, which seems to be fixed in 10.8.2.
F fleawannabe macrumors regular Oct 12, 2012 #4 I don't think the .2 bump is worth the price, but you should go and get the 8GB of RAM IMO.
R Radiating macrumors 65816 Original poster Oct 12, 2012 #5 fleawannabe said: I don't think the .2 bump is worth the price, but you should go and get the 8GB of RAM IMO. Click to expand... Price is no object it's a work laptop I'm getting for travel and in field use to edit and manage presentations. Battery life is a priority though, I'm getting a retina MacBook for the hardware intense work. I currently have a 2010 2.13 ghz maxed out MacBook Air.
fleawannabe said: I don't think the .2 bump is worth the price, but you should go and get the 8GB of RAM IMO. Click to expand... Price is no object it's a work laptop I'm getting for travel and in field use to edit and manage presentations. Battery life is a priority though, I'm getting a retina MacBook for the hardware intense work. I currently have a 2010 2.13 ghz maxed out MacBook Air.
ssn637 macrumors 6502 Oct 13, 2012 #7 http://www.anandtech.com/show/6063/macbook-air-13inch-mid-2012-review/8 Attachments 47767.png 42.4 KB · Views: 196
T TC25 macrumors 68020 Oct 13, 2012 #8 Radiating said: How does the battery life compare between the 1.8ghz and 2.0 ghz versions? Click to expand... It's approximately the same.
Radiating said: How does the battery life compare between the 1.8ghz and 2.0 ghz versions? Click to expand... It's approximately the same.
Abazigal Contributor Oct 13, 2012 #9 Radiating said: How does the battery life compare between the 1.8ghz and 2.0 ghz versions? Click to expand... Battery life is reportedly a tad shorter for the faster processor, but this was for the 2011 models. http://maccrazy.com/macbook-air-2011-i5-vs-i7-is-the-upgrade-worth-it
Radiating said: How does the battery life compare between the 1.8ghz and 2.0 ghz versions? Click to expand... Battery life is reportedly a tad shorter for the faster processor, but this was for the 2011 models. http://maccrazy.com/macbook-air-2011-i5-vs-i7-is-the-upgrade-worth-it
T TC25 macrumors 68020 Oct 13, 2012 #10 Abazigal said: Battery life is reportedly a tad shorter for the faster processor, but this was for the 2011 models. http://maccrazy.com/macbook-air-2011-i5-vs-i7-is-the-upgrade-worth-it Click to expand... Good grief, common sense would tell you this. 🙄
Abazigal said: Battery life is reportedly a tad shorter for the faster processor, but this was for the 2011 models. http://maccrazy.com/macbook-air-2011-i5-vs-i7-is-the-upgrade-worth-it Click to expand... Good grief, common sense would tell you this. 🙄
Abazigal Contributor Oct 13, 2012 #11 TC25 said: Good grief, common sense would tell you this. 🙄 Click to expand... Common sense can tell you precisely how mug battery life is shorter by in a laptop?
TC25 said: Good grief, common sense would tell you this. 🙄 Click to expand... Common sense can tell you precisely how mug battery life is shorter by in a laptop?