Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Jethryn Freyman

macrumors 68020
Aug 9, 2007
2,329
2
Australia
Oh yeah, broke 20K:

9Xy2G.png
 

VanneDC

macrumors 6502a
Jun 5, 2010
860
92
Dubai, UAE
Lol !! X800 beating a 7800gtx.. What a joke. Also no one ever commented on why overclocking results are the same as stock results...
 

Jethryn Freyman

macrumors 68020
Aug 9, 2007
2,329
2
Australia
Lol !! X800 beating a 7800gtx.. What a joke. Also no one ever commented on why overclocking results are the same as stock results...
I guess it's just that the higher clocks overpower them, ATI cards are very easy to overclock and mine, at least, can sustain a very high overclock, thanks god, it really inflates my e-penis <3

----------

Lol !! X800 beating a 7800gtx.. What a joke. Also no one ever commented on why overclocking results are the same as stock results...
Also, OpenMark is a *very* GPU based test, overclocking literally gave me a 25%+ performance increase over stock, and stable too, as long as memory isn't increased over 129% (or 159% on a Radeon 7500 on an eMac.)
 

Jethryn Freyman

macrumors 68020
Aug 9, 2007
2,329
2
Australia
*exactly* the same as my old 9600 XT in my G5, it's kinda weird really, that the same GPU scores exactly the same, but then again, overclocking does make a huge difference, so part of me says that this really must be a 99.9% GPU intensive test

----------

Lol !! X800 beating a 7800gtx.. What a joke. Also no one ever commented on why overclocking results are the same as stock results...
Also: if I've already addressed this, my apologies, but overclocked results are significantly higher than stock results, as expected, and with my FireGL GPU, still stable. As with the Radeon 7500 in my eMac, the memory clock is the main bandwidth restriction compared to the actual GPU clock
 

Starfighter

macrumors 6502a
Jun 17, 2011
679
36
Sweden
*exactly* the same as my old 9600 XT in my G5, it's kinda weird really, that the same GPU scores exactly the same, but then again, overclocking does make a huge difference, so part of me says that this really must be a 99.9% GPU intensive test

Yeah, I noticed that we got the exact same results! :)
 

zen.state

macrumors 68020
Original poster
Mar 13, 2005
2,181
8
You don't think it's a little /strange/ you got exactly the same result???

You really don't understand benchmarks if you think the same result on the same GPU is odd. Your lack of understanding is promoting ignorance.
 

zen.state

macrumors 68020
Original poster
Mar 13, 2005
2,181
8
Finally got around to running this on my Radeon 9800 Pro.

Scored an 8719 vs 5171 on my Geforce 6200
 

chibiterasu

macrumors 6502
Apr 5, 2012
337
24
London, The United Kingdom
I just noticed that no one has posted a score for the fx 5200 ultra (iMac G4 1.25Ghz)

Anyway it came up with
NVIDIA NV34MAP OpenGL Engine
1440x900x32
Score 1752

So not but bad but not as good as most of you PowerMac people with your big graphic cards.
 

Jethryn Freyman

macrumors 68020
Aug 9, 2007
2,329
2
Australia
Anybody got any benchmarks with a 512MB NVIDIA 7800? Especially the "Gainward Bliss" version.

Curious about performance. I'm considering about searching for an upgrade for the sake of my own ego, though I'd hate to give up another PCI slot.
 

wobegong

Guest
May 29, 2012
418
1
Anybody got any benchmarks with a 512MB NVIDIA 7800? Especially the "Gainward Bliss" version.

Curious about performance. I'm considering about searching for an upgrade for the sake of my own ego, though I'd hate to give up another PCI slot.

Yep - Mines on this thread somewhere.....
 

Jethryn Freyman

macrumors 68020
Aug 9, 2007
2,329
2
Australia
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.