Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Wild-Bill

macrumors 68030
Jan 10, 2007
2,539
617
bleep
Greed.

Can't upgrade the memory either unless you get a 27" model. And only then do you get a 7200RPM hard drive.

The only reason there is no 7200 RPM drive in the 21.5 inch is so Apple can save money and charge you more. There are 2.5 inch 7200 RPM hard drives in plentiful supply, but the 5400 RPM's are cheaper.

And the only reason you can't upgrade the memory on those new 21.5's is because Apple wants more of your money. How DARE you circumvent their highway robbery-esque memory module upgrade prices all these years!! How DARE you pay HALF for a bump from 4 GB to 8GB by buying memory modules from a 3rd party!!! We'll fix that: solder it to the board. Charge highway robbery-esque prices for a bump from 4 to 8GB of dirt-cheap DDR3 RAM. Profit.
 

beerglass007

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
May 13, 2008
547
94
Fusion drive is worth the extra money. You may not like paying it, but adding ssd functionality for $300 and getting additional storage space is worth it for a computer you should expect to use for four years, at least.

So put it in the budget right now.

That's my point. Budget for it now, because its worth it

So the 21" imac is not £1500, I think I'm out this time round

Money isn't the problem here, its the getting ripped off I'm starting to hate
 

ceraz

macrumors member
Apr 1, 2008
82
26
After digesting the maketing hype, I don't get the logic for the 1T fusion drive at a price of $250

$250 for 1T fusion drive for mac mini
$300 for 256 SD drive for mac mini

I don't think anybody would argue that a single SDD is better than SSD+HD. In the end your HD is spinning generating heat, fans etc...

Isn't it more interesting to get a single 512 GB SSD for $400 (or 256 GB for 200USD) and put the default 1TB HD into an external usb 3.0 enclosure

I'd love to know why people are storing beyond 500GB of data on their local drive.
 

TallManNY

macrumors 601
Nov 5, 2007
4,741
1,594
The fusion drive gives you simplicity and nothing external on your desk. But I think you are right that the vast majority of folks could fit anything they consistently use on 256 and put the rest on an external drive that rarely gets accessed.

But personally, I'm not worried about the fan noise of these drives since I don't hear my current 2011 iMacs drive. I'd go for the seamless solution that keeps it all internal and provides me plenty of storage.

I wonder how fusion would work with bootcamp though? Could you designate some SSD space for both OSes? Then 126 is probably going to be very tight.
 

bobright

macrumors 601
Jun 29, 2010
4,813
33
Has Apple said how much the Fusion drive will cost?

I haven't seen it anywhere also when will we know when we can preorder?
 

MonkeySee....

macrumors 68040
Sep 24, 2010
3,858
437
UK
You can see it as an add on when configuring the iMac

*edit

They said it was about an extra $250 on the Cult of Mac Cultcast. not sure where they got that from though?

*double edit

it was priced on the Mac mini
 

phoenixsan

macrumors 65816
Oct 19, 2012
1,342
2
That will be.....

A good estimate (the mac Mini price). I dont see how Apple can buy these components from sources charging a lot more beetwen. Having said the latter, maybe Apple can factor down or up depending in assembly costs specific to iMac models....:):apple:
 

bobright

macrumors 601
Jun 29, 2010
4,813
33
What if we want simply SSD (in smaller capacity) instead of hybrid or HDD is there a charge for that?
 

nuckinfutz

macrumors 603
Jul 3, 2002
5,539
399
Middle Earth
Right but there's a charge for that it isn't a choice in the base model for instance 1tb HDD or 500gb SSD?

Yeah until the Macs are ready for sale we may not know the configuration options.

I was thinking about the 3TB Fusion Drive but then it dawned on me that the 1TB should be fine and I'm gonna need external storage anyways for video and audio files.
 

G4-power

macrumors 6502
May 29, 2004
261
21
Vaasa, Finland
Nothing "ace" to me. They are just using the functionality of intel chipset that was available since z68 chipset was introduced. Intel SRT. What is interesting is how did they bypassed the 64gb limmitation of that technology. Could be a custom chipset.

This isn't SRT, though. SRT is a form of SSD caching, where the most-used data from the HDD is copied to the SSD. On Fusion Drive however, most-used data is moved to the SSD, so you get full capacity. This is more RAID stripe -like behavior, with the OS (or some chipset) figuring out what to keep on the SSD.
 

CoreyLahey

macrumors regular
Jun 18, 2012
220
0
It hasn't been stated yet, but for the Mac mini that option is $250, so that may be the cost for iMacs.

I hope it will be a bit less for the iMac, given that the Mac Mini's standard drive has 5,200 rpm versus the iMac's 7,200. But I don't have experience with Apple's pricing in those matters, it's wishful thinking really.
 

bobright

macrumors 601
Jun 29, 2010
4,813
33
I hope it will be a bit less for the iMac, given that the Mac Mini's standard drive has 5,200 rpm versus the iMac's 7,200. But I don't have experience with Apple's pricing in those matters, it's wishful thinking really.

199 would be nice but I doubt it

I wonder what apple is waiting for, let us know the damn price points and when we can preorder??!?
 

CoreyLahey

macrumors regular
Jun 18, 2012
220
0
199 would be nice but I doubt it

I wonder what apple is waiting for, let us know the damn price points and when we can preorder??!?

I hope preorder starts at the same time for 21 and 27, even if the latter will ship in December. But it seems like Apple isn't the only company that has announced products that are still unavailable, all those other new AIOs can't be bought either, and I also wanted to take a look at the Chromebook, which is nowhere to be had.
 

dearlaserworks

macrumors regular
Apr 28, 2012
235
2
Eastern Shore, USA
I expect $250, same as Mac Mini. There is no 7200 rpm drive option for the 21" and nowhere does it state that Fusion drive is always 7200 rpm. I expect Fusion on 21" is just 128GB flash added w software to make Fusion magic happen, same as for 27".
 

leman

macrumors Core
Oct 14, 2008
19,187
19,039
Nothing "ace" to me. They are just using the functionality of intel chipset that was available since z68 chipset was introduced. Intel SRT. What is interesting is how did they bypassed the 64gb limmitation of that technology. Could be a custom chipset.

No they are not, they are using this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchical_storage_management

The cost is a bit on a higher side, that is true, but given that Apple is the only company offering such tech to the consumer you can't say that its too expensive, as there is simply nothing to compare it to (its very different from a hybrid drive with a small SSD cache). Basically you get write speeds of a fast SSD but a storage capability of a HDD. The read speeds will also be those of SSD for data where the speed matters matters.

Is it overpriced? It sure is. Is it expensive? Not really - an SSD of that size would only offer very slight real-life performance benefits but would me much more expensive.

Edit: a new wikipedia link - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automated_Tiered_Storage
 

iSayuSay

macrumors 68040
Feb 6, 2011
3,792
906
To make the iMac as a great machine with least bottleneck, one would need:

High end 27" iMac .. $2000.
CPU upgrade to i7 ... $200.
GPU upgrade to 680MX .. Unknown, but I assume it would cost around $200.
1TB Fusion drive .. extra $300.
Total cost: $2700, roughly.

Luckily you can upgrade the RAM yourself for much cheaper alternative.

Clearly, to get a decent and workable machine, for gaming, editing, rendering, $2000 is not enough.

Like I said, it's a half baked machine and way putting the sweet candies just a little bit beyond your reach.
So the cruel fact is, if one going to get a high end 27" .. "might as well" pick those upgrades.
 

bobright

macrumors 601
Jun 29, 2010
4,813
33
To make the iMac as a great machine with least bottleneck, one would need:

High end 27" iMac .. $2000.
CPU upgrade to i7 ... $200.
GPU upgrade to 680MX .. Unknown, but I assume it would cost around $200.
1TB Fusion drive .. extra $300.
Total cost: $2700, roughly.

Luckily you can upgrade the RAM yourself for much cheaper alternative.

Clearly, to get a decent and workable machine, for gaming, editing, rendering, $2000 is not enough.

Like I said, it's a half baked machine and way putting the sweet candies just a little bit beyond your reach.
So the cruel fact is, if one going to get a high end 27" .. "might as well" pick those upgrades.

Since when was the fusion drive 300$?
 

iSayuSay

macrumors 68040
Feb 6, 2011
3,792
906
Since when was the fusion drive 300$?

Okay, it's not $300. Upgrade 1TB 5400rpm drive to 1TB fusion drive on Mac Mini costs $250 ... my bad. Yes you can expect the same pricing scheme for iMac from other refreshed Mac, i.e Mac Mini and 13" cMBP.

But let's assume you also get external SuperDrive for iMac, it's $60 .. boom .. another purchase for something which has already been included and built-in on previous-gens iMac.

Fact is, now $2000 gets you nothing but basic iMac with a lot of things to expand and leaves you wanting this and that. GPU, CPU, RAM, FusionDrive, Superdrive, FW adapter. Half baked machine.
 

LachlanH

macrumors regular
Oct 5, 2011
158
7
Can anyone confirm that the 27" will actually be able to be configured with JUST an SSD, lower than 768gb?

I kind of got the impression that the drive options would be

1TB Drive - Standard
1TB Fusion - $250
3TB Fusion - $350?
768GB SSD - $eleventybillion

with no option for a 256/512gb SSD only?


I am interested in how this Fusion drive performs, it is indeed an interesting concept. I do feel though that it should have been standard with 1TB fusion.

Think about it, next year the classic Macbook Pro's will surely dissapear leaving the iMac the only shipping Apple computer with zero SSD storage as standard. (Mac Pro not included).

I wonder if next year they will drop the classic macbook pro's and also make 1TB fusion drives standard.

EDIT: Just realised the Macmini also doesn't have any SSD storage as standard. The high end should have a 1TB Fusion drive I reckon, along with every iMac model.
 
Last edited:

majkom

macrumors 68000
May 3, 2011
1,854
1,150
Think about it, next year the classic Macbook Pro's will surely dissapear leaving the iMac the only shipping Apple computer with zero SSD storage as standard. (Mac Pro not included).

I wonder if next year they will drop the classic macbook pro's and also make 1TB fusion drives standard.

EDIT: Just realised the Macmini also doesn't have any SSD storage as standard. The high end should have a 1TB Fusion drive I reckon, along with every iMac model.

And that is the irony - if this is true (that next year classic mb pro will be abandoned) then only desktop class computers will be sold without ssd as standard;))) funny, desktop used to be higher performance than portables, but in apples "think different" world, everything is possible;)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.