Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:12 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple's New Fusion Drive Works on Older Macs




One of the interesting additions to Apple's iMac and Mac mini lines announced last week is Fusion Drive, a hybrid storage system that combines a 128 GB solid-state drive (SSD) with a 1 TB or 3 TB traditional hard drive into a single volume to offer the best of both worlds in terms of performance and storage space. Apple's software automatically manages the combined volume, placing the core system and other frequently used applications and files on the solid-state drive for faster access while keeping lower-priority applications and data on the traditional hard drive.

Mac developer Patrick Stein has been toying with his own Mac Pro setup and has managed to build his own Fusion Drive using command line tools. Stein configured an internal solid-state drive and a USB-attached traditional hard drive on his system and was able to combine them into a single logical volume as used for Fusion Drive.
Quote:
Attached are a 120GB SSD (disk1) and a 750GB HDD (disk7) to my Mac. I attached the SSD via SATA to be sure that the system could figure out that it's a SSD via SMART. The HDD is attached via USB. USB I chose to clearly see a difference in speed.
Stein then proceeded to test the setup, writing data first to the SSD and then to the traditional hard drive once the SSD had filled up. By preferentially accessing data that had initially been written to the traditional hard drive, Stein was able to watch as the data was automatically transferred to the SSD for faster access. Upon stopping the process, the system automatically pushed the data back to the traditional hard drive, and in one final step Stein began accessing the data once more and after about an hour was able to see it pulled back onto the SSD.

In several follow-up Tumblr posts, Stein details further explorations into how Fusion Drive works, noting that he was able to use not only the default HFS+ file system for OS X with it, but also ZFS. All of Stein's work was performed with a standard installation of OS X 10.8.2.

Article Link: Apple's New Fusion Drive Works on Older Macs
MacRumors is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:14 AM   #2
lifeinhd
macrumors 65816
 
lifeinhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: 127.0.0.1
Now I'm kinda wishing I'd gone for a thick MBP instead of my rMBP and swapped out the ODD The second of my two biggest complaints is about the meager storage.

Still, can't complain about the gorgeous display
__________________
PowerBook G5, 1.67GHz MacBook Pro, iPhone Nano, iPhone 6, Apple Television Set
lifeinhd is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:15 AM   #3
chuckd83
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
nice

can we use USB 3 and have the SSD as an external drive?
chuckd83 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:18 AM   #4
macnerd93
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: United kingdom
Now another reason I'm glad I didn't get the substantially worse new iMac and opted for the 2011 gen last Wednesday

The process will most likely get simplier, perhaps even an app made what automates the process of making the fusion drive. Then i'd just get a Thunderbolt SSD and stick with my 500GB Internally. I know it says only SATA for now, but you never know whats possible in time.

I would gladly open my iMac and fit an SSD, but I bought Apple care with it since I got it at a 60% discount, I don't really don't wanna void it if it can be helped xD. Still, at least I can upgrade the ram to 32GB unlike the new 21.5''. Only gonna cost me 110 quid for that amount of ram.
__________________
21.5'' iMac, iMac G4 17'', Power Mac G5, PowerBook G4 15'', 13'' MacBook Pro, MacBook, Mac mini, eMac, Power Mac G4 Graphite, Power Mac G4 QS, Macintosh SE/30, iPod 4th Gen, iPad mini, iPhone 5S,

Last edited by macnerd93; Oct 31, 2012 at 10:25 AM.
macnerd93 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:19 AM   #5
Redbeard25
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Okay... now I want to do this with an internal SSD and a Drobo, so my spinning drives can all fail over time.
__________________
MacBookPro9,1(work), MacBookAir4,2, iPhone 4 S⃣ 16GB, iMac7,1, iPad 3,1, iPod 80GB, iPod4,1 (8G) TV3,1 x 2, PBK 165c, 512K Mac
Redbeard25 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:20 AM   #6
WestonHarvey1
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Is this really exactly the same as Apple's implementation of Fusion Drive? That wasn't made clear to me by the article.
WestonHarvey1 is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:21 AM   #7
milbournosphere
macrumors 6502a
 
milbournosphere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
This is really cool. He makes a good point about HFS+, though. Looking forward to seeing some solid testing numbers down the road to see if the smart caching in the Fusion drive matches up (or beats) to the caching built into firmware of similar 'hybrid' drives available from WD and others. I might just have to look into throwing something like this together in my Mac Pro.
__________________
Russian roulette linux style : dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/kmem bs=1 count=1 seek=$RANDOM
milbournosphere is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:21 AM   #8
JuBe
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Am I thinking of something else or is ZFS that sexy format that could handle the theoretical data limit of the universe, right?
__________________
15.4" Macbook Pro, 2.53 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 700 something GB HD; iPhone 4s
JuBe is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:22 AM   #9
IJ Reilly
macrumors G5
 
IJ Reilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Palookaville
Is this a stable setup? The article is very technical and doesn't really say if a non-techie could make it work safely. I notice he isn't providing any script to automate the setup process.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by WestonHarvey1 View Post
Is this really exactly the same as Apple's implementation of Fusion Drive? That wasn't made clear to me by the article.
This too.
__________________
*The season starts too early and finishes too late and there are too many games in between.
Bill Veeck
IJ Reilly is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:23 AM   #10
sou1 so1di3r
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Send a message via AIM to sou1 so1di3r
So how can I go about getting this to work on my 2011 Mac Mini??
sou1 so1di3r is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:24 AM   #11
reallynotnick
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Might be time to remove the DVD drive in my MBP and install an SSD. I didn't want to have to deal with split drives and this would be amazing if it worked.
__________________
13in MBP, 2.26GHz, 8GB RAM, 500GB WD Scorpio Blue HDD
reallynotnick is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:25 AM   #12
blybug
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Galveston, TX
Just installed this upgrade on my 2010 MBP 2 weeks ago. When Apple announced the Fusion drive I wondered if the current OS X 10.8.2 would recognize and use the hybrid drive in this way, or if Seagate has baked something into this line.

Actually I partitioned the hybrid into 250 for the OS and 500 which I then RAID-1'ed with the existing internal drive. So I don't really know what's going on in there. Everything is definitely faster but also did a clean install of ML so who knows.
blybug is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:25 AM   #13
phoenixsan
macrumors 65816
 
phoenixsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Good news!

Because initially I thought the Fusion drive was managed/enabled via a software implementation. Later, I heard things making me rethink and see it as a hardware enabled option. Indeed, good news! Hope the software tools mentioned can be published/public
__________________
Mac Pro 2012 3.06 Westmere version, 12 Core 64 GB RAM, 4 TB , iPhone 5 (black)
phoenixsan is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:29 AM   #14
Limboistik
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
AFAIK Mountain Lion has built in handling instructions for Fusion drive.
But, on the hardware side, doesn't it require a custom controller?
Limboistik is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:29 AM   #15
ALR26
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
So he has an internal SSD and an external HDD with a single drive letter, what makes that a "fusion" drive? Nothing! There's no proof this is what Apple calls Fusion Drive technology. The article is a fail.

P.S. There's Windows software out there that will combine various drives into a single "hybrid" volume. Does that mean that's "fusion" drive software? I think not.
ALR26 is offline   13 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:30 AM   #16
sno1man
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by IJ Reilly View Post
Is this a stable setup? The article is very technical and doesn't really say if a non-techie could make it work safely. I notice he isn't providing any script to automate the setup process.

----------



This too.
Probably not totally stable yet, but well on it's way. Kudos for him both for having the skills and making the effort.

This reminds me of the original CCcloner. The first few iterations had teething issues and broke for every new hardware configuration or OS update. My point being that we will likely see a user friendly utility out of this in a few months

Very cool regardless
sno1man is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:32 AM   #17
hayduke
macrumors 65816
 
hayduke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: is a state of mind.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALR26 View Post
So he has an internal SSD and an external HDD with a single drive letter, what makes that a "fusion" drive? Nothing! There's no proof this is what Apple calls Fusion Drive technology. The article is a fail.

P.S. There's Windows software out there that will combine various drives into a single "hybrid" volume. Does that mean that's "fusion" drive software? I think not.
Respectfully disagree. The article explains that the file swapping is working in "fusion" mode, which is really what makes it a fusion drive in the first place.

Regardless, my guess is Apple blocks this option in an update.
hayduke is offline   20 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:32 AM   #18
Kev.LoveMac
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
What if there is a thunderbolt SSD with a USB HDD

Great to know how it works! I would like to know if an alternative solution could also work. With a thunderbolt SSD (tSSD) and a USB HDD (uHDD), one installs the whole OS X 10.8.2 on the tSSD and only mounts the uHDD. How the performance looks like?
Kev.LoveMac is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:32 AM   #19
vthree
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
I can't wait til there's some easy instructions to get this up and running --- maybe something like trim enabler... I'm currently running vtx3 120gb + 1tb in my mid 2011 iMac!
vthree is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:32 AM   #20
charlituna
macrumors 604
 
charlituna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
Mac developer Patrick Stein has been toying with his own Mac Pro setup and has managed to build his own Fusion Drive using command line tools.
So the headline is false. It's not Apple's Fusion Drive at all.

It should read more like "Computer Geek manages to emulate Apple's Fusion Drive in his own setup"
charlituna is offline   11 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:33 AM   #21
q64ceo
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Correct me if I am wrong, but isnt the Fusion drive just some RAID'ed drive?
__________________
iMac i7 27inch mid 2010 | iPod Touch 4th Generation | iPad 2 | eMac 1.25 PPC mid-2004 | So I sold out and got an iPhone. Using all this Apple stuff is making me rusty on my real computer skillz
q64ceo is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:33 AM   #22
OldSchoolMacGuy
macrumors 6502a
 
OldSchoolMacGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Good news. Means something like the approach in this article may make it so we can create our own Fusion drives.

http://www.petralli.net/2012/10/anal...nal-hard-disk/
OldSchoolMacGuy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:33 AM   #23
sransari
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Really awesome. Had this question about "fusing" two internal drives together on my Mac Pro when I first heard of the fusion drive. I would love to see some software with a nice UI for n00bz like me that lets you define the drives you want to fuse and the behavior for how to move files from one drive to the other.
__________________
2008 MacPro 8-core, 2.8 GHz, 32 GB RAM, 250 GB SSD
2011 Macbook Air 1.2 GHz i5
2012 Macbook Pro Retina 2.3 GHz i7
iPad 4th Gen Retina, iFone 5S
sransari is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:34 AM   #24
oYx
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALR26 View Post
So he has an internal SSD and an external HDD with a single drive letter, what makes that a "fusion" drive? Nothing! There's no proof this is what Apple calls Fusion Drive technology. The article is a fail.

P.S. There's Windows software out there that will combine various drives into a single "hybrid" volume. Does that mean that's "fusion" drive software? I think not.
It appears to work like how Schiller describes Fusion Drive though. Apple's marketing is a force to be reckoned with.
oYx is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2012, 10:35 AM   #25
charlituna
macrumors 604
 
charlituna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by IJ Reilly View Post
Is this a stable setup? The article is very technical and doesn't really say if a non-techie could make it work safely. I notice he isn't providing any script to automate the setup process.[COLOR="#808080"]
As setting it up requires using Terminal etc I wouldn't say this is something a non techie could do 'safely'. If one was going to try to do it, a backup would most definitely be in order because chances are the data will get screwed at least a couple of times before it all gets set up right.
charlituna is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC