|
|
#1 |
|
How Close are We to Violence?
And I don't mean the regular violence we already suffer from in the U.S. I mean violence spawned from the political schism that only seems to be widening in this country.
Is this just a phase the nation is going through? Will we be able to heal the schism (or endure it) without resorting to violent social unrest? What can be done—if anything—to reduce the political tensions? |
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
2
|
|
|
#3 |
|
|
3
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Very witty, though. Maher, I mean. The rhetoric is certainly warlike enough.
__________________
"The louder he talked of his honor, the faster we counted the spoons." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Quote:
It's where all of the "real Americans and take our country back" rhetoric comes from. Whenever I hear that I ask take the country back from who? And they just kinda blink and stare knowing they can't answer honestly or be known as racist. |
||
|
|
6
|
|
|
#6 |
|
I would say that it has the potential to blow up badly, and badly being in the Lincoln/Kennedy sense (read: assassination attempts). I hope for everyone's sake that I am completely wrong.
Either way, I'm glad this has come up, because this week's episode of This American Life touches on this subject, and how close we are to things getting out of hand with such polarization. It's definitely worth a listen to and hopefully gets all of us here to stop and think about things and how crazy we are becoming. This isn't pretty, and to be honest, puts on a bad face of how we live in the US. From someone on the outside looking in, we look like pansies that can't get along unless some major catastrophe occurs. That would make others not really want to come here, even to visit. Seriously, we need to stop, and take a look at ourselves in the mirror. BL. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 |
|
My worry is not so much political polarization, but economic inequality and inequality of opportunity. I just don't see the current situation being sustainable and I wonder how the system will come back into balance. Let us hope it will be through sensible investment in the health and education of people rather than violence.
__________________
My first was a Mac+. Now I own an iPhone with 3.5x the pixels, a colour display, WiFi, 512x the RAM, >1500x the data storage, and 100x the speed. And it fits in the palm of my hand.
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Quote:
If that doesn't happen we will be in for a long,bad ride. |
||
|
|
3
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Yes, if Obama loses.
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#10 |
|
I think it is just a phase. People tend to forget that there has been polarization before (and no, I am not talking about the civil war). As ugly as this campaign has been, there have been worse examples long before any of us were around. But we moved past that. We will someday move past this time period too.
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#11 |
|
American politics is a game. Watch how the reporters on election night report the score and how, as the results are coming in from the western suburbs, so-n-so is making gains, etc, etc. The loser makes a concession speech, people grumble, sola resurgit vita. Americans are not like Liverpool FC fans after a loss to Arsenal, the clock runs out, we go home, elated or downcast.
The real metric is probably the classic axiom, we are about three meals away from violent revolution. Or maybe $7/gal gas.
__________________
Mr. Paul, sir, I thought you should be advised, there seems to be a zombie tribble clinging to your head, for it is scarfing your brain
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Quote:
Perhaps the end of the election alone will be a reason to dial back the rhetoric and start seeking some reconciliation. But I really don't expect for that to be the case. If Romney loses, I highly doubt the right wing will see it as a sign that they should move back towards the center, and instead see it as confirmation that they didn't nominate a "true" conservative. The only thing that might change their strategy is a loss of the house majority in the 2014 mid-term elections. That might compel them to rethink things. Until then I expect a full-scale onslaught from both politicians and media, which will only serve to increase discontent and suspicion amongst the masses. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Let's hope there will be no politically based violence but I believe the American political system needs to break down and fall apart and be rebuilt on new values and needs of the people who live in 2012 and not in 1776, 1885 or 1955.
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Then they will lose the next election too. And keep losing them until they get it through their heads that extremism does not work. That in order to win an election you have to be moderate. You have to reach out to different demographics, not reject them and push them away. You would think they would have learned that by now, but apparently not.
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
I say we revert to the popular vote, eliminate 'running mates', and the top two votes get pres/vice pres...then maybe that will force them all to work together and get along. I imagine if we had an Obama/Romney leadership that they would eventually have to settle the differences and work together through a practical but useful compromise. At least interparty turmoil has always worked in this fashion.
---------- People aren't exactly happy with democratic leadership either, FYI... Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#17 |
|
If we see even one political ad after this Tuesday, I'm pretty sure there'll be lots of violence.
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Given Gandhi didn't use violence 75 years ago, it seems fairly unlikely that the US will use it now.
__________________
If they have to tell you every day they are fair you can bet they arent, if they tell you they are balanced then you should know they are not - Don't Hurt me |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#19 |
|
|
3
|
|
|
#20 |
|
I agree that it was unacceptable.
__________________
If they have to tell you every day they are fair you can bet they arent, if they tell you they are balanced then you should know they are not - Don't Hurt me |
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#21 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#22 |
|
I think one of the big issues facing us is media activism. I feel like our media has lost objectivity because every major news entity has picked a side and they predominantly report (political) news favorable to that side. I don't think this trend contributes to political reconciliation; just the opposite.
__________________
Daily Driver - 2.3g Ci7 rMBP, 8g, 256gb Travelers 32g iPhone5/iPad4 Server - 2.3g Ci5 Mac Mini, 8g, 500gb/2tb, OSX Server |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Where's the hate?
__________________
"The louder he talked of his honor, the faster we counted the spoons." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#24 |
|
I think both convey the dissatisfaction Americans have with their government. Sometimes I think we should fire every elected official and start from scratch and eliminate the things that make elections unfair.
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#25 |
|
I'd be okay with that if it didn't throw our whole country into chaos. For the same reason that replacing every single person in the company you work for would lead to absolute chaos and a lack of experience causing the company to go into a tailspin crisis, the same could be said on a governmental level as well. Only worse, since that involves more then widgets and invoices. It involves military and nukes.
|
|
|
|
2
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 AM.







was a Mac+. Now I own an iPhone with 3.5x the pixels, a colour display, WiFi, 512x the RAM, >1500x the data storage, and 100x the speed. And it fits in the palm of my hand.
Linear Mode
