Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,469
30,691



Over the past several months, we've been following the situation with a court case in the United Kingdom in which Apple was ordered to post an acknowledgement on its website and place advertisements in newspapers and magazines acknowledging that Samsung did not infringe upon the protected iPad design with its line of Galaxy Tab devices.

The original statement published by Apple playfully quoted statements from the judge's ruling saying that the Samsung Galaxy Tab was "not as cool" as the iPad and noted that it had won cases against Samsung in other jurisdictions, but the court did not take kindly to Apple's additions to the required text.

Apple has now posted revised text linked from its main UK page, with the new text appearing to be in compliance with the court's order. But as The Next Web points out, Apple has added a bit of code to its site to ensure that the notice can not be seen by users unless they scroll down the page.
This code essentially ensures that the iPad mini advertisement takes up the whole page. In other words, no matter your resolution, you won't see the statement without scrolling down the page. It's no wonder that it took Apple so long to post the second apology; the company was likely looking for loopholes. [...]

What this does show, however, is that Apple is very unhappy with the verdict in the UK. The company is doing everything it can to ensure as few people know about the issue as possible. Yet it's antics like this one that bring the verdict more and more into the spotlight.
ipad_mini_uk_apple_front.jpg
In our testing, a Safari window with the toolbar, bookmark bar, tab bar, and status bar turned on would have to be over 1700 pixels tall before the full Samsung text at the bottom of the page would be visible without scrolling.

The code is actually being used on a number of Apple's international sites that do not include the Samsung acknowledgement, giving the company the ability to claim that it was not specifically deployed to hide the statement, but it is not present on the main apple.com front page. It is also not the first time Apple has used such vertically responsive design, as it used similar scripts to adjust the layout of the main pages when the iPhone 5 was being featured.

Article Link: Apple Posts Revised Samsung Apology on UK Website, Hides It Below the Fold
 

MMOTotal

macrumors regular
Aug 9, 2012
176
0
Azeroth
For the most part people wouldn't scroll down there in the first place, a sneaky move but if it puts an end to the whole scenario then who cares.
 

east85

macrumors 65816
Jun 24, 2010
1,343
495
The original statement published by Apple playfully quoted statements from the judge's ruling saying that the Samsung Galaxy Tab was "not as cool" as the iPad

Fair, next.

Seriously, can't blame Apple for trolling that troll judge back. :D
 

odditie

macrumors 6502
Jan 6, 2004
290
183
It's kinda humorous going back and forth from apple.com to apple.com/uk to see the differences.

I'm sure they are pissed, but hopefully this doesn't just drag the whole thing out longer.
 

cambox

macrumors 6502
Jun 8, 2010
256
35
omnipresent
Sad

Shame Apple are acting like a little school boy, they should man up and accept they were found guilty, but then this is Apple the bully.
 

r-m

macrumors 6502a
May 7, 2010
597
46
what differences are there between apple.com and apple.com/uk ? other than the extra video and a few different tiles?
Am I missing it =\
 

Attachments

  • applecom.JPG
    applecom.JPG
    123.2 KB · Views: 299
  • applecomuk.JPG
    applecomuk.JPG
    124.8 KB · Views: 284

MMOTotal

macrumors regular
Aug 9, 2012
176
0
Azeroth
Shame Apple are acting like a little school boy, they should man up and accept they were found guilty, but then this is Apple the bully.

I can assure you any other company would do the same. Let's not join the Apple hate wagon here.
 

Macboy Pro

macrumors 6502a
Feb 16, 2011
730
52
What kind of teenagers are making these decisions at Apple? Just display the dang text and let the 30 days expire. If you are right and your product is great, you will be fine. Instead you look immature and arrogant.
 
Last edited:

MonkeySee....

macrumors 68040
Sep 24, 2010
3,858
437
UK
Its not even the ruling on the first page. haha. Its an apology for mugging off the judge. You still have to click a link which nobody will be bothered to do.
 

lifeinhd

macrumors 65816
Mar 26, 2008
1,428
58
127.0.0.1
I would have gone with 1801 pixels to be safe, to ensure no one with a retina MBP running at native res can see it :D
 

Jsameds

Suspended
Apr 22, 2008
3,525
7,987
Shame Apple are acting like a little school boy, they should man up and accept they were found guilty, but then this is Apple the bully.

It does come across as a little smarmy but originally they followed the court order to the letter, but the judge didn't agree - he was being pedantic about the whole affair, so Apple responded like this, playing him at his own game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: martyjmclean

fowler.

macrumors 6502a
Apr 18, 2004
585
0
Pasadena
It's called "responsive design", which Apple has been employing on their site for years, in one way or another.

This isn't anything new or conspiratorial.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.