I wouldn't laugh this off. Apples been working on very powerful ARM chips.
As a matter of fact this is the future of computers. Not just Apple.
As a matter of fact this is the future of computers. Not just Apple.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Considering Switch From Intel Chips in Future Macs
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
This would be a disaster, mainly due to the complete compatibility with Windows a Mac has, remove that and what you going to do? Not every app and very few games run on Mac OSX.
I cannot see this as being a Jobs decision if true? IMO it would put Apple back into the dark ages again. An iOS device is a lot different to a Mac computer.
I cannot see this as being a Jobs decision if true? IMO it would put Apple back into the dark ages again. An iOS device is a lot different to a Mac computer.
Already today Linux runs on ARM. Microsoft is moving to ARM then if Apple switched you woud still be able to run Mac OSX, Windows (8 or maybe "9") and Linux all on ARM.
Also seeing as Apple can design this any why they like, perhaps they put an x86 core in the ARM CPU? No reason all the cores have to be identical.
I've been thinking of years that non-symetric multi processing is a good idea.
Ok, let me phrase it like a question:
Assuming Apple comes out with ARM Macbook Airs next year, WHAT makes anyone think the iMacs will switch too?
Seems like everyone is assuming that an ARM Mac means their can't be Intel Macs anymore and, frankly, I don't know why anyone is thinking that.
I'm saying that the existence of Windows RT next to Windows 8 shows that it's certainly possible to run a company that way.
Intel doesn't license out x86 anymore. AMD has a perpetual license because of historical reasons.
This could just be some FUD spread by apple itself to coerce Intel into giving it better deals, etc.
Or, it could be some of Apple's products in a Windows RT sense and the unification of iOS and OSX where some laptops might be very low powered/high battery devices.
I really doubt after going to the trouble to switch to Intel they would find competitive advantage in trying to switch back away.
Or, it could be some of Apple's products in a Windows RT sense and the unification of iOS and OSX where some laptops might be very low powered/high battery devices.
I really doubt after going to the trouble to switch to Intel they would find competitive advantage in trying to switch back away.
Blaha Blah Blah Blah Blah. I had already called out that your rebuttal would be a silly attempt at narrowly defining what a Virtual Machine is and isn't.
The other extraneous blather about bytecode was needlessly injected by you to someone show some Alpha Male superiority.
LLVM "is" another compiler but the static analysis and ability to target other platforms is the key message here.
In 4 years time x86 architecture could have reached its' limits with ARM designs catching up fast.
Although is is strange to what was essentially Acorn computers become so dominant.
Although is is strange to what was essentially Acorn computers become so dominant.
And let me rephrase as "Why would they ship iOS MacBook Airs" ? What aren't you getting of the Windows ARM strategy ?
Windows 8 ARM (Windows RT) = iOS
Windows 8 x86 = Mac OS X
What would be the point of shipping a laptop iOS device with the iPad doing so well ?
Will Apple really power the Mac Pro with a cellphone CPU?
LOLLOL
What if it powers it with 12 to 24 of them? 25 if you dock your iphone
So why exactly does the current Mac Pro come with a three-year old (!) CPU?
Do you really believe hasn't put out anything in the last three years worth of being a replacement for the Xeon W3565?
Oh yeah, and about USB3.0?
Thunderbolt?
Yeah, ARM is a better chip for low powered devices that don't absolutely need processing power. They're great for consumption and light workload computers, but are ultimately, like you said, supplementary to x86.
It's like a scooter is great for going to places around town, but when you want to do some travelling, you'll want to drive a car.
...the title of the thread?
Question is, why would they do that? What advantages would an ARM Mac offer over an x86 Mac? Better battery life at the expense of processing power? That'd basically be an iPad with a built in keyboard and no touchscreen capabilities. There aren't any reasons for Apple to make an ARM based Mac any time soon.
Glad to see you're finally understanding how what you're talking about has nothing to do with this thread topic. Too bad the only way to admit it is by moving goalposts.
If every company started creating ARM-compatible versions of their software, it'd be fine. If every piece of software (first and third-party) that is already out for the Mac received an ARM-compatible update, it'd be fine.
If not, this move will surely do more harm than good.
The switch to Intel CPUs was an age-long request from most software companies and from most users. But no one is pushing for ARM to become an alternative to x86 on desktops or laptops.
No. One.
I hope Apple doesn't go down this road just for the sake of being different and for the sake of breaking paradigms.
I love my Mac, but I won't hesitate to switch if Apple decides to prevent me from using the software I need, just for the sake of being industry rebels.
If not, this move will surely do more harm than good.
The switch to Intel CPUs was an age-long request from most software companies and from most users. But no one is pushing for ARM to become an alternative to x86 on desktops or laptops.
No. One.
I hope Apple doesn't go down this road just for the sake of being different and for the sake of breaking paradigms.
I love my Mac, but I won't hesitate to switch if Apple decides to prevent me from using the software I need, just for the sake of being industry rebels.
Which is why they're done.
Apple likely has an Architectural License or will have one soon enough so that they can design ARM chips they way then need to.
I don't a future where Intel is going to offer this kind of customization and Apple's lifeblood is being just different enough than the competition.