|
|
#1 |
|
Base-Config Mac Mini with VMWare
Will the base configuration mac mini (upgraded to 16GB crucial RAM) run VMWare with Windows 7/8 on 2 monitors run well??
- I will not be running any games on it - I will be running Lightroom 3 on windows (thru VMWare) - I will be using iMovie (nothing fancy though, just basic trims, etc) - both monitors are 1080p and 2-year olds - 80% of the time is just running YouTube videos on it I am mainly worried about the integrated graphics (or should I be worried about something else too?). So, will the base-config mac mini work well for me? Thanks! |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Make sure you install the 64-bit version of Windows and give any virtual machine 4+ GB of RAM and they should run fine.
__________________
2012 2.3GHz i7 Mini, 16GB RAM; 2009 2.93 GHz C2D iMac, 8GB RAM, 640GB HD, GT120 1.83 GHz CD Mini, 2GB RAM, 200GB HD; 800 MHz 17" G4 iMac, 1GB RAM, 120GB HD 32GB White iPhone 4S, 32GB White iPad2 |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 |
|
windows
i'd boot straight into windows to do that setup. i'd give all 16gb to it that way!
__________________
27" Imac I7, 2.8Ghz, 8GB Ram, 160GB Intel SSD ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac mini 2012 2.3Ghz 16GB Ram, 256gb samsung 830 SSD ![]() Iphone 5 and iPad 64gb
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Quote:
You are definitely going to need that 16 GB of RAM, and I'd consider giving 6 GB to the virtual machine. The VM software will take up a bit of the MAC's memory space so with a 50/50 split (8 GB for the VM) the mac ends up with less than half of the usable memory. If you can push your budget, the i7 with twice as many cores, hyperthreading and twice as much on-chip cache will make a noticeable difference. If you were running the Mac version of Lightroom it wouldn't be as much of a big deal, but with the VM overhead as well it's worth serious consideration. Simon Hibbs |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Well, I think I can use my LR3 license on Windows with the mac version as long as I don't use them at the same time (or maybe at all). At least I know people have done it and Adobe seem to be okay with it, but that's for another topic altogether.
While I'm not cash-strapped at the moment, $200 is still not a small amount even for the i7 cpu and its inherent advantages over i5. At this point I'm inclined to just wait for the base iMac and see what it offers me. As for VMware/Parallels, are they even worth it? Particularly with Windows 8? Any potential issues I should be looking into? Thanks for the replies guys. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
MBP 8,2 15" 2.2Ghz w/ 120GB SSD + 500GB MBA 4,2 13" 1.7Ghz w/ 128GB SSD Mac Mini 6,2 2.3ghz w/ 240GB SSD + 1TB Mac Pro 1,1 w/ 8 cores @ 2.66 w/ 240GB SSD |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Thanks for pointing this out. That's is what I'm most worried about. So basically as long as I upgrade the ram and the cpu, I'm good? Nothing to worry about the HD4000? This is for a system that will always run 2 monitors, windows8 thru VM, and occasional LR3 and iMovie?
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
MBP 8,2 15" 2.2Ghz w/ 120GB SSD + 500GB MBA 4,2 13" 1.7Ghz w/ 128GB SSD Mac Mini 6,2 2.3ghz w/ 240GB SSD + 1TB Mac Pro 1,1 w/ 8 cores @ 2.66 w/ 240GB SSD |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Quote:
http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Rad...M.43963.0.html Also note the HD4000 and 2012 Mini are exhibiting a yet-to-be-resolved "blackout" and "snow" issue with the HDMI port. So be aware of that if you're going to use the HDMI port. https://discussions.apple.com/messag...23456#20336117 Last edited by calvol; Nov 20, 2012 at 12:19 AM. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Actually, the base i5 supports hyperthreading. Not sure why folks think it doesn't.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#11 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Quote:
Simon Hibbs |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Out of curiosity. Why? You've got iMovie in OSX...
__________________
2012 Mac Mini |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#15 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#16 |
|
I understood from your OP that you wanted Windows in order to -amongst other stuff- use iMovie. My bad!
__________________
2012 Mac Mini |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Okay, in general terms, how is the ATI Radeon 4650 (discrete graphics I configured with an HP pc almost 3 years ago) compared to the HD4000? I know the 4650 is supposed to be a low-end dedicated graphics and that the HD4000 is supposed to be much improved compared to previous integrated solutions. But are they at least comparable?
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
My gadgets - Sony Vaio FW290 CTO, Dell XPS M1330, MBP 13 2.4GHz 2010, iPod Touch 64Gb/8GB, Zune 32GB, HTC Touch Pro-2, Palm Pre (My Favoraite device), Dell Mini 9 Hackintosh |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Nonsense... I have a client running Windows 7 via Fusion on a 2010 Core2Duo Mini with 8GB RAM. She is running myriad apps including Dragon Dictate and other demanding apps without any problems. So an i5 or i7 Mini with 16GB RAM will have no problem running Windows via VM or Bootcamp.
|
|
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 PM.






27" Imac I7, 2.8Ghz, 8GB Ram, 160GB Intel SSD 
Linear Mode
