I think this is the result of the latest update to Mountain Lion.
I have a 2012 macbook pro with 10GB of RAM, 1X2GB and 1X8GB sticks. Before the update, 512MB was allocated to the HD4000. However, after the latest graphic patch (the one over 100MB), the allocated RAM for the HD4000 went down to 384MB.
It would be interesting to see the RAM allocation of the HD4000 from someone with 16GB of RAM.
The VRAM allocation going down to 384MB is only on the 15" cMBP and it affects everyone regardless of the RAM
Except those with 16
No you dont Lol.
I think this is the result of the latest update to Mountain Lion.
I have a 2012 macbook pro with 10GB of RAM, 1X2GB and 1X8GB sticks. Before the update, 512MB was allocated to the HD4000. However, after the latest graphic patch (the one over 100MB), the allocated RAM for the HD4000 went down to 384MB.
It would be interesting to see the RAM allocation of the HD4000 from someone with 16GB of RAM.
Intel HD 3000 has 512 MB on OS X 10.8.5 with my late 2011 15" Macbook Pro, 16 GB of RAM.I can confirm that after updating from 10.8 to 10.8.5 Combo Update with 16GB ram, the graphics card does change to 384MB on 15" MacBook Pro (mid-2012) non-retina.
I can confirm that after updating from 10.8 to 10.8.5 Combo Update with 16GB ram, the graphics card does change to 384MB on 15" MacBook Pro (mid-2012) non-retina.