Is this just for 2012 (Ivy Bridge/HD 4000) machines with an HDMI port? Or is it for all of them? Or is it just Mac mini customers? I have a non-retina 15" MacBook Pro; it lacks an HDMI port, and the HD 4000 isn't the only GPU I have to play with, am I affected? These are things I wish were made clearer in the original article.
Apple isn't directly pushing for integrated GPUs. They're pushing for smaller designs which necessitate integrated GPUs. Make the thing *gasp* larger, and that's not a problem.
The Mac mini never had all that stellar of a video card. There were only two generations with discrete graphics, the high-end version of the previous mid-2011 generation, and the original PowerPC G4-based model. Neither models had graphics that were any higher than low-end in terms of discrete GPUs for their respective time. The Radeon HD 6630M was never all that great. Yes, it's better than the Intel HD 4000, but not by a whole lot. And no, the graphics are not that great; but they're not all that bad; they're getting much better. The Intel HD 4000 is definitely faster than the GeForce 8600M GT in 2007 and 2008 pre-unibody MacBook Pros. Hell, it's probably comparable to the GeForce 9600M GT found in the first two revs (2008 and 2009) of unibody MacBook Pros.
The Air and the 13" Pro (both retina and non-retina) are too thin to accommodate a discrete GPU. I'm not too sure why they didn't do it on the Mac mini. Them doing it with the last rev was really cool.
Apple are the ones pushing for integrated GPU's. That's why there are no discrete GPU's in the rMBP 13" and MBA's.
Apple isn't directly pushing for integrated GPUs. They're pushing for smaller designs which necessitate integrated GPUs. Make the thing *gasp* larger, and that's not a problem.
Those intel integrated graphics are not very good. It really is ashamed that Apple did not put a better discrete graphics card in the mini. The graphics on the latest 13" MacBook Air are the same and really do not perform well for any type of heavy duty 3D applications. My 6 year old 17" MBP with discrete 256 MB graphics card performs better. The pro seems to really be going out of all the Apple products for lighter, thinner consumer models. It is ashamed that they do not offer the professional users many options these days. I was on the verge of buying a mini as a secondary machine until I read the specs about the video card. This is a step backwards.
The Mac mini never had all that stellar of a video card. There were only two generations with discrete graphics, the high-end version of the previous mid-2011 generation, and the original PowerPC G4-based model. Neither models had graphics that were any higher than low-end in terms of discrete GPUs for their respective time. The Radeon HD 6630M was never all that great. Yes, it's better than the Intel HD 4000, but not by a whole lot. And no, the graphics are not that great; but they're not all that bad; they're getting much better. The Intel HD 4000 is definitely faster than the GeForce 8600M GT in 2007 and 2008 pre-unibody MacBook Pros. Hell, it's probably comparable to the GeForce 9600M GT found in the first two revs (2008 and 2009) of unibody MacBook Pros.
So the Macbook Air, Macbook Pro 13 inch and Mac Mini wouldn't have any GPU lol? Apple can already put in an Nvidia or AMD GPU if they wish, they can turn off Intel's GPU or have it be switchable, they just don't because they want their cost to be low, not provide a powerful laptop.
The Air and the 13" Pro (both retina and non-retina) are too thin to accommodate a discrete GPU. I'm not too sure why they didn't do it on the Mac mini. Them doing it with the last rev was really cool.