Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:29 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
New iMac Benchmarks Show 10-25% Improvement Over Previous Generation




Primate Labs today posted a summary of the new iMac benchmarks hitting the company's Geekbench Browser, showing fairly strong performance increases over the previous generation of machines. The analysis focuses on the 21.5-inch models, as the 27-inch models are not launching for several more weeks, and the latest high-end 21.5-inch model scores nearly 25% higher than its 2011 counterpart and even bests the high-end 27-inch model from last year by nearly 10%.

The report also pits the new 21.5-inch iMac against the current generations of Apple's other two desktop lines, the Mac mini and Mac Pro. The comparison to the Mac mini reveals that users can achieve nearly the same performance as the mid-range iMac by purchasing a high-end Mac mini, although customers would obviously have to supply their own displays and other peripherals.
Quote:
What's interesting here, though, is how the quad-core Core i5 iMacs perform compared to the quad-core Core i7 Mac minis. Since Core i7 has hyper-threading technology (and the Core i5 does not), it can execute more instructions at once, leading to higher performance.

Here this means that the mid-range Mac mini is faster than the mid-range iMac that's almost twice the price. True, you do get a display and a discrete GPU with the iMac, but these Geekbench results show how powerful the new Mac mini is despite its size.
As for the Mac Pro, which is still stuck on older-generation processors rather than adopting Intel's Sandy Bridge E chips, the new iMac is now on par with all but the high-end 12-core Mac Pro models.

As for the new 27-inch iMac, a handful of Geekbench results have already appeared in the database running a special Build 12C2037 of OS X 10.8.2. The results indicate that an early benchmark that appeared in mid-May was indeed accurate and indicate that the new high-end 27-inch model will outperform its 2011 counterpart by nearly 15%.

Article Link: New iMac Benchmarks Show 10-25% Improvement Over Previous Generation
MacRumors is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:31 AM   #2
needfx
macrumors 68020
 
needfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: macrumors apparently
is that all?
needfx is offline   15 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:32 AM   #3
Keniutek
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Poland
Not that impressed.
Keniutek is offline   13 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:32 AM   #4
JaySoul
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Lost too much weight. Not enough calories to run fast.
JaySoul is offline   44 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:34 AM   #5
Yvan256
macrumors 601
 
Yvan256's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
At least the previous generation of Mac minis had one model with a discrete GPU.
Yvan256 is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:36 AM   #6
Naimfan
macrumors 68030
 
Naimfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
So in exchange for more money, we get slightly faster performance which will be invisible to almost EVERY user of an iMac, no optical drive, a non-user upgradable machine, and a new design that values form over function.

In short, the new iMac joins the Macbook Air and the retina Macbook Pro as a disposable computer.

Apple, in my view, needs to get over its obsession with thinness.

And why, given the weight reduction and the elimination of the optical drive, does it cost MORE?
__________________
"I find the great thing in this world is not so much where we stand, as in what direction we are moving."
Oliver Wendell Holmes
Naimfan is offline   57 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:36 AM   #7
dashiel
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keniutek View Post
Not that impressed.
Iím always curious what people who say this do with their computers. I look at people like Louis C.K. who edited the first two seasons his show on a 13" MacBook Pro and then come here and see people moaning about benchmarks Ö so Iím curious what do you actually do that you need such power?
dashiel is offline   26 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:39 AM   #8
robjulo
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Only a 15% improvement while removing key components? No thanks.
robjulo is offline   26 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:39 AM   #9
daneoni
macrumors G4
 
daneoni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Meh
__________________
15" rMBP Core i7 | 27" ACD | AEBS | 5G iPod | iPhone 5S | 3G Apple TV | rMini
daneoni is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:41 AM   #10
krye
macrumors 68000
 
krye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Almost all of the time, the benchmarks only compare the new to the old. What about switchers? I have a 2008 Mac Pro that's growing a little long in the tooth. I'd love to wait for the "new" Mac Pro, but who knows what it's going to be or how much it is. I don't know if I can spend another $3000 on a Mac.

I'm seriously considering switching to a 27" iMac. But I'd like to know on what order of magnitude it'll smoke my 4 year old Mac Pro. I played around with the last gen iMac at the Apple Store for 15 minutes months ago and I wasn't at all impressed with its shoddy multitasking and window/app switching with multiple pro apps open. I had Aperture, Logic and some other stuff open and it really started to bog down. And that was without actually "doing anything". I guess there's something to be said for that $300 ATI card in my Mac Pro.

But if I can get a new iMac for $1000 less that's faster, I might just consider it. I mean, I'd never buy the high end 12-core Mac Pro option anyway. It's just way too expensive.

The benchmarks on the site pretty much show the new iMac as being on-par with the entry-level 2010 Mac Pro. So you guys think it's safe to assume that the new iMac will be the same as my slightly upgraded 2008 Mac Pro with the upgraded ATI card and 8G of RAM?

Last edited by krye; Nov 30, 2012 at 10:47 AM.
krye is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:41 AM   #11
wildspin
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toronto
Just curious ... are these result with or without the contributions of fusion drives?
wildspin is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:45 AM   #12
tufinhas
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Not at all surprised. Was holding out for a new iMac since last february but after these overpriced new models, decided on another route. Glad I bough my mid-range late 2012 mac mini with extra ram, then!

T.
tufinhas is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:45 AM   #13
jack92029
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Late 2012 Mac Mini @ 10,500

The Late 2012 Mac Mini with a Geek Benchmark of 10,500 (mine with 8gb of Ram did better) is better than the 21.5" iMac.

Yes the iMac has more features than a Mini, but the Mini is now More than competitive. I added a Dell Ultra 24" screen (half way between the 21.5" & the 27") for a total out the door cost of $1100. Interesting alternative and my mouse and keyboard from the Late 2009 iMac (sold for $400) still works fine.
__________________
Late 2012 Mac Mini 2.3 Ghz i7, 1 TB, 8 Gb Ram Geek Benchmark 10955
jack92029 is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:46 AM   #14
cgdrennan
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Naimfan View Post
So in exchange for more money, we get slightly faster performance which will be invisible to almost EVERY user of an iMac, no optical drive, a non-user upgradable machine, and a new design that values form over function.

In short, the new iMac joins the Macbook Air and the retina Macbook Pro as a disposable computer.

Apple, in my view, needs to get over its obsession with thinness.

And why, given the weight reduction and the elimination of the optical drive, does it cost MORE?
You post in ignorance my friend. They have already done tear downs of the new iMac and it is very user upgradable... Hard drive, ram, and even the fact that the CPU is not soldered. The screen is held on by magnets like the previous model but since the LCD is laminated to the glass it is easier to get in to.
cgdrennan is offline   16 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:48 AM   #15
jim.bright17
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Alberta
Quote:
Originally Posted by wildspin View Post
Just curious ... are these result with or without the contributions of fusion drives?
AFAIK, Geekbench only tests CPU and RAM performance. So any upgrades in GPU, SSD etc. wont be measured.
__________________
3.33 Ghz 6-core Mac Pro Black iPhone 5 White 64GB WiFi + 4G iPad 32GB iPad Mini
jim.bright17 is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:49 AM   #16
nwcs
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tennessee
Wow, making me think the Mac mini may really be a good way to go!
__________________
This space intentionally not blank
nwcs is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:50 AM   #17
Isengardtom
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
I wouldn't expect a hugh performance jump for the CPU

for the 27inch, I'm more interested in GPU performance of the 680MX card
Isengardtom is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:51 AM   #18
losthorse
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
-- removed by user --

Last edited by losthorse; Jul 15, 2014 at 09:11 PM.
losthorse is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:51 AM   #19
Naimfan
macrumors 68030
 
Naimfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgdrennan View Post
You post in ignorance my friend. They have already done tear downs of the new iMac and it is very user upgradable... Hard drive, ram, and even the fact that the CPU is not soldered. The screen is held on by magnets like the previous model but since the LCD is laminated to the glass it is easier to get in to.
No, it isn't. Apple specifies that there are no user-serviceable parts inside (RAM on the 27" excepted). So if you want to void the warranty, have at it.

You post in ignorance, my friend . . .



Also - my Late 2011 base MBP is faster than all the iMacs listed save the top two. A desktop should smoke a laptop . . .
__________________
"I find the great thing in this world is not so much where we stand, as in what direction we are moving."
Oliver Wendell Holmes
Naimfan is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:54 AM   #20
GenesisST
macrumors 65816
 
GenesisST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Where I live
Is actually the same, the results were just divided by the thickness...
__________________
Kenmore microwave, Frigidaire oven, Fisher & Paykel fridge, LG washer & Dryer and Crane toilet
GenesisST is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:54 AM   #21
WilliamG
macrumors 601
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Seattle
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgdrennan View Post
You post in ignorance my friend. They have already done tear downs of the new iMac and it is very user upgradable... Hard drive, ram, and even the fact that the CPU is not soldered. The screen is held on by magnets like the previous model but since the LCD is laminated to the glass it is easier to get in to.
Agreed. This is the most upgradeable iMac yet. Having taken apart my 2009 27" iMac to replace the hard drive, the 2012 model looks like a blessing in this regard.
__________________
iMac, MacBook Air, Mac mini, iPad, iPhone, 55-11
www.bighugenerd.com
WilliamG is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:57 AM   #22
Simplicated
macrumors 65816
 
Simplicated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Waterloo, ON
Quote:
Originally Posted by losthorse View Post
Apple is in a decline... so sad.
Please give me a break.
__________________
Clarus says "Moof!"
Simplicated is offline   19 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 10:57 AM   #23
bflowers
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Naimfan View Post
So in exchange for more money, we get slightly faster performance which will be invisible to almost EVERY user of an iMac, no optical drive, a non-user upgradable machine, and a new design that values form over function.

In short, the new iMac joins the Macbook Air and the retina Macbook Pro as a disposable computer.

Apple, in my view, needs to get over its obsession with thinness.

And why, given the weight reduction and the elimination of the optical drive, does it cost MORE?
I agree with Naimfan, even though I stayed up last night to order a top end machine. It is a desktop, and for the once or twice in its life that I have to take it to an Apple Store, or ship it, I don't need it thinner and lighter. I sucked it up and bought the Superdrive, which I might obnoxiously strap the the machine and send a picture to Phil and friends. I know I will use it, but it is ridiculous to exclude it. Make it a BTO option for a second drive bay, but leave an ALL-IN-ONE as a single unit!

It must be that they are located in California, where surgically altered cosmetics are more important than what is on the inside
bflowers is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 11:00 AM   #24
xxgilxx
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
That will be a significant upgrade...If the iMac were a phallus!!!

Last edited by xxgilxx; Nov 30, 2012 at 11:04 AM. Reason: Comic effect improvement...
xxgilxx is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2012, 11:00 AM   #25
HarryKeogh
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashiel View Post
Iím always curious what people who say this do with their computers. I look at people like Louis C.K. who edited the first two seasons his show on a 13" MacBook Pro and then come here and see people moaning about benchmarks Ö so Iím curious what do you actually do that you need such power?
I do a lot of shopping on Amazon.com so I need the fastest computer I can get my hands on to snag the best deals.

And it's so thin!
HarryKeogh is offline   18 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
move AEBS config from previous generation to current generation? fhall1 Mac Peripherals 4 Apr 25, 2014 10:54 AM
Maps on iCloud.com show isles of Home Improvement store FreeState iCloud and Apple Services 7 Apr 15, 2014 02:45 PM
Haswell: out! "The single largest generation-to-generation battery life improvement" Jobsian MacBook Air 36 Apr 16, 2013 11:37 AM
Previous generation iPhone models 5/5s rex3 iPhone 6 Mar 24, 2013 01:59 PM
4th Generation iPad Benchmarks Show 1.4GHz Dual Core Processor, 1GB of RAM MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 276 Nov 14, 2012 07:00 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC