Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > Mac Blog Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 4, 2012, 02:24 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
LaCie d2 External Hard Drives Upgraded With Thunderbolt Ports




LaCie's popular d2 series of hard drives have been upgraded with Thunderbolt, in addition to the existing USB 3.0 ports. There is a 3TB model for $299 and a 4TB unit for $399, both coming with 3-year warranties.

LaCie promises top performance from the drives, though they are hampered a bit by the legacy hard drives inside. Solid state drives are needed to achieve the highest transfer speeds. That said, for those needing maximum storage, these drives should do the trick.
Quote:
Deadlines rule our world. When digital storage is critical for your project, it had better be as fast and reliable as you are. In every office setting, it has to connect to any computer, deliver more than enough speed for the most demanding applications, and be completely reliable. Enter the LaCie d2 USB 3.0 Thunderbolt Series.
The drives are available from LaCie's online store.

Article Link: LaCie d2 External Hard Drives Upgraded With Thunderbolt Ports
MacRumors is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 02:28 PM   #2
thuchu1
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Auburn Hills, MI
It's great to finally see Thunderbolt trickling down to consumer price levels. Not a steal, but for a quality, well-designed product it's not too bad at all.
__________________
MacBook Pro 15" 2.2GHz i7, 8 GB RAM, 128 SSD Optibay / 750GB HDD | iPhone 5 16GB | iPad Mini LTE
thuchu1 is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 02:30 PM   #3
The Bulge
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Up your ass.
Wait don't sayt it. Cable's not included?
The Bulge is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 02:31 PM   #4
dlastmango
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: West Coast - FLORIDA
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bulge View Post
What don't sayt it. Cable's not included?
the cable IS INCLUDED!!!

Box Content:
LaCie d2 USB 3.0 Thunderbolt Series
* USB 3.0 cable (USB 2.0 compatible)
* Thunderbolt cable
* Drive stand for upright use
* Rubber feet for horizontal use
* External power supply
* Quick Install Guide
* CD with User Manual and software
dlastmango is offline   11 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 02:32 PM   #5
The Bulge
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Up your ass.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlastmango View Post
the cable is included!!!

Box content:
Lacie d2 usb 3.0 thunderbolt series
* usb 3.0 cable (usb 2.0 compatible)
* thunderbolt cable
* drive stand for upright use
* rubber feet for horizontal use
* external power supply
* quick install guide
* cd with user manual and software
omg
The Bulge is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 02:33 PM   #6
Johnny Vegas
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Not a bad price considering the $50 thunderbolt cable is included. However, I'm skeptical of the 180 MB/s speeds... And is too much to ask for two thunderbolt ports for those of us that need to daisy chain?
__________________
Does anybody even read signatures?
Johnny Vegas is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 02:37 PM   #7
nuckinfutz
macrumors 603
 
nuckinfutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Middle Earth
Thunderbolt pricing is improving.

As the article mentions, spinning drives cannot keep up but Thunderbolt does open the option doing a RAID across external drives and not being bus limited.
nuckinfutz is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 02:43 PM   #8
nutmac
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Even considering the inclusion of Thunderbolt cable, the drive is at least $100 overpriced. The fact is made worse considering USB 3.0 offers more than plenty speed for hard disks. Macs with USB 2.0 (but without FireWire) may benefit from this drive, but even still, I rather spring $29 for Thunderbolt to FireWire adapter and be done with it.
nutmac is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 02:56 PM   #9
The Bulge
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Up your ass.
Still i wonder if this is a normal Thunderbolt cable or some sort of proprietary connector on one end and normal Thunderbolt on the other?
The Bulge is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 02:56 PM   #10
iVoid
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
And another worthless thunderbolt device with only ONE TB port.

Sorry, I need to daisy chain my TB devices, Lacie.
iVoid is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 02:58 PM   #11
nuckinfutz
macrumors 603
 
nuckinfutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Middle Earth
Quote:
Originally Posted by iVoid View Post
And another worthless thunderbolt device with only ONE TB port.

Sorry, I need to daisy chain my TB devices, Lacie.
Damn. Not a wise decision. It could be a limitation of the cheaper TB chipset.
nuckinfutz is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 02:58 PM   #12
Penn Jennings
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Vegas View Post
Not a bad price considering the $50 thunderbolt cable is included. However, I'm skeptical of the 180 MB/s speeds... And is too much to ask for two thunderbolt ports for those of us that need to daisy chain?
Maybe if you only write for.. half a second :-)

The price is improving. However USB 3.0 HDDs are going for under $150 and have over 100MB per second throughput. Thunderbolt is hard to justify unless you have a MBA, 2011 MBP or 2011 iMac. Thunderbolt for a external RAID or SSD makes sense, but for HDD.. not so much if you can swing USB 3.0.

I'd pick one up though if it gets close to $200... since I have a 2011 MBP

EDIT:
Wait! 1 Thunderbolt port, I'd pass. I'm not doing the monitor/drive swap thing That makes me sad.

The photo shows 3 stacked, USB 3.0 I guess. Thunderbolt is turning out to a sad joke for most consumers.
Penn Jennings is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 02:59 PM   #13
AcesHigh87
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Good to finally see Thunderbolt prices dropping. Maybe by the next time I'm in the market for a new drive I'll actually be able to afford TB. For now FW800 is fast enough for my editing and USB 2.0 is good enough for backups.

Edit: Unfortunately I also only just noticed the one thunderbolt port. Some of us need that second monitor and don't want to spend $1000 for the apple thunderbolt display. Daisy chain is a key.
__________________
21.5" iMac (Mid 2011), 2.8GHz i7, 20GB of RAM, 1TB HDD | 13" macbook (Early 2008), 2.4 GHz C2D, 2GB RAM, 60GB G-Skill SSD | 16GB iPhone 5S | Apple TV | 16GB iPod nano (7th Gen)

Last edited by AcesHigh87; Dec 4, 2012 at 03:05 PM.
AcesHigh87 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 03:03 PM   #14
Lancer
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
I guess like any Mac you're paying for more than the basic specs, you pay for quality given the fact you can get USB3 drives from WD and Seagate at a fraction of the price and it will do just as good a job.

ETA - I'm looking at getting a 1.5Tb Seagate GoFlex with USB3 for less than $80AU to backup my 1Tb Fusion iMac when it gets here.

Last edited by Lancer; Dec 4, 2012 at 03:16 PM.
Lancer is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 03:04 PM   #15
nuckinfutz
macrumors 603
 
nuckinfutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Middle Earth
Quote:
Originally Posted by nutmac View Post
Even considering the inclusion of Thunderbolt cable, the drive is at least $100 overpriced. The fact is made worse considering USB 3.0 offers more than plenty speed for hard disks. Macs with USB 2.0 (but without FireWire) may benefit from this drive, but even still, I rather spring $29 for Thunderbolt to FireWire adapter and be done with it.
I'm not sure there are many $199 drives that are going to deliver the metal chassis, kensington lock, software and more that the D2 lineup has.

Sure you can buy a cheap plastic drive at Best Buy but the D2 lineup has been pretty solid for Lacie over the years.
nuckinfutz is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 03:05 PM   #16
Lancer
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
...

Last edited by Lancer; Dec 4, 2012 at 03:16 PM.
Lancer is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 03:06 PM   #17
nuckinfutz
macrumors 603
 
nuckinfutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Middle Earth
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lancer View Post
I guess like any Mac you're paying for more than the basic specs, you pay for quality given the fact you can get USB3 drives from WD and Seagate at a fraction of the price and it will do just as good a job.
Yes you can but you are also getting what you pay for. TB doesn't require the CPU utilization that USB does.

There are many things you can do in life but efficiency is going to vary depending on the needs of the individual.
nuckinfutz is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 03:07 PM   #18
wgnoyes
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Kind of funny seeing hard drives referred to now as "legacy" devices.
wgnoyes is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 03:18 PM   #19
Penn Jennings
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuckinfutz View Post
Yes you can but you are also getting what you pay for. TB doesn't require the CPU utilization that USB does.

There are many things you can do in life but efficiency is going to vary depending on the needs of the individual.
I have a 2012 Mac mini server (dual core i5) that drives a USB 3.0 drive at 80 MB per second as a Time Machine Drive via ethernet and 2 GB virtualbox VM and the CPU doesn't come above 25%. I'd guess that driving 100 MB per second on a quad core i7 would use less than 10% CPU via USB 3.0. Thats pretty much a non issue and not worth paying a 100% markup for.

The promise of thunderbolt was 1 cable that could connect to multiple devices and push data as fast the devices can handle it. Thunderbolt does do that but the premium is outrageous, the cost is 2 - 3 times USB 3.0. For the vast majority of people, USB 3.0 makes thunderbolt a non starter. That is the problem. (Again, all my opinion)
Penn Jennings is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 03:19 PM   #20
chuckles:)
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: CANADA
Quote:
Originally Posted by wgnoyes View Post
Kind of funny seeing hard drives referred to now as "legacy" devices.
They are. Linus Torvalds predicts they'll be going the way of the tape drive shortly.
__________________
Loves People, Loves Apple. 13" MBA 2013, 32GB iPhone 5, 64GB iPad (1st gen).
chuckles:) is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 03:22 PM   #21
termite
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by nutmac View Post
I rather spring $29 for Thunderbolt to FireWire adapter and be done with it.
FireWire 800 gets you somewhere around 80-90MB/s, which is far slower than this drive.
termite is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 03:24 PM   #22
The Bulge
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Up your ass.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckles:) View Post
They are. Linus Torvalds predicts they'll be going the way of the tape drive shortly.
Not in his lifetime.
The Bulge is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 03:25 PM   #23
nuckinfutz
macrumors 603
 
nuckinfutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Middle Earth
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penn Jennings View Post

The promise of thunderbolt was 1 cable that could connect to multiple devices and push data as fast the devices can handle it. Thunderbolt does do that but the premium is outrageous, the cost is 2 - 3 times USB 3.0. For the vast majority of people, USB 3.0 makes thunderbolt a non starter. That is the problem. (Again, all my opinion)
Yes that's the point really. There's too much crapping up of Thunderbolt threads from people that clearly don't need it. You're happy with USB 3.0 that's great but for a video editor or other vertical markets the added price is inconsequential.
nuckinfutz is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 03:33 PM   #24
termite
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bulge View Post
Not in his lifetime.
Yes, flash memory will overtake hard drives. Here's why: flash memory roughly follows Moore's Law. Disk drives don't. So while disk density is increasing, flash density is increasing *much* faster. Follow the math, and you will realize that at some point within ten years, flash will be cheaper, larger, and faster than spinning rust.
termite is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2012, 03:51 PM   #25
wonderspark
macrumors 68030
 
wonderspark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oregon
Well, considering I recently picked up a 4TB USB 3.0 external HDD (WD My Book) for $199, which is probably pretty close to the speed of the LaCie, I'd say it's NOT worth double the price.

I like LaCie, and I have two of their older FW800/eSATA models, but I don't like them *that* much.
__________________
Wait a second... So you're telling me anything that happens in the sky is legal, and there's a giant crime-blimp flying around this place? I don't know how I missed that.
wonderspark is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > Mac Blog Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What SSD drives does Lacie use in Thunderbolt cases? propower Mac Peripherals 2 Dec 8, 2013 09:26 PM
Bought a LaCie Thunderbolt external hard drive, WOW! Imola Ghost Mac Peripherals 10 Apr 30, 2013 03:59 AM
Do USB 3 & Thunderbolt external Hard Drives need separate power? spinstorm iMac 6 Jan 2, 2013 01:47 AM
Fusion Drive vs. external thunderbolt hard drives Simonmiller iMac 28 Nov 29, 2012 12:20 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC