|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#26 |
|
|
1
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#29 |
|
__________________
Wait a second... So you're telling me anything that happens in the sky is legal, and there's a giant crime-blimp flying around this place? I don't know how I missed that. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#30 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#31 |
|
I saw that deal, too... but I prefer WD myself. If Costco had the WD for $179, it would be ideal!
__________________
Wait a second... So you're telling me anything that happens in the sky is legal, and there's a giant crime-blimp flying around this place? I don't know how I missed that. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#32 |
|
[QUOTE=Lancer;16425529]I guess like any Mac you're paying for more than the basic specs, you pay for quality given the fact you can get USB3 drives from WD and Seagate at a fraction of the price and it will do just as good a job.
/QUOTE] "quality"? I bet inside the Lacie drive is a Seagate, WD, Samsung, or Hitachi drive! Just because we own a Mac doesn't mean we enjoy getting gouged. Sigh... |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Definitely good news - I will get one of these when I have to replace my FW 800 LaCie drives someday in the future.
__________________
iMac 27" Core i7 3.4GHz, 16GB RAM, 2GB GPU, 120GB SSD+4TB HD, Bowers & Wilkins 685, Nuforce HDP, OS X 10.8.3; iPad 3 Wi-Fi+4G 64GB; iPhone 5 White 32GB. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Quote:
Give it a year and 256GB SSD's will be under the $100 mark, and 512GB SSD's will be fairly commonplace. I'd guess it'll be another 2 and a half years before we see 1TB SSD's at a decent price (e.g $100-$200). ---------- I've got one of these and it's flawless. Avoid the Seagate 'Expansion' however as it's rather loud compared to their other drives.
__________________
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#35 |
|
It doesn't matter that the prices are coming down in TB-capable drives that contain HDDs. HDDs should not even be mentioned in sentences that contain the word Thunderbolt.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Empty enclosures, please! :-)
__________________
OS X 10.9 and iOS 7 delayed. Haswell Q3/Q4 2013. -------------------- “Only the dead have seen the end of the war.” -- Plato --
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Quote:
The only components in the "Expansion" enclosure are the SATA hard drive and the SATA to USB 3.0 circuit board. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Hell Is Starting To Freeze Over
The Thunderbolt "glacier" actually moved...
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#40 |
|
If LaCie gets around to selling an empty enclosure that is also easy to add your own disk, I would agree with you.
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Seems pretty good for the guy or gal that needs to shuttle lots of huge files between different computers - USB 3.0 for most PCs or Macs that have USB 2.0 or 3.0 interface, a likely scenario, or Thunderbolt if the computer has it. It's one drive that can do a lot; a desktop version of LaCie's Rugged USB 3.0 Thunderbolt drive.
Daisy-chain? NOT! But there are alternative drives that hold multiple drives that can benefit from the speed, and connect to other devices. 180MB/sec? Sure, I've seen this kind of performance from 3TB and 4TB drives when un-RAIDed inside the 2big Thunderbolt from LaCie that comes with 7200RPM drives. The Seagate and WD dual-drive enclosures come with slower 5400 RPM and green drives, so can't deliver that kind of speed from a single drive. For USB performance, you'll be wanting to make sure that UAS is supported for the best possible performance when connected via USB 3.0. The LaCie drives in the Apple Store support this, so I suppose this one does too. Don't have the dollars? Then pick up one of the less expensive USB3 drives from several vendors. Good to see some improvements in the desktop drive space. Will have to see if the piggy bank can spring for this drive to add to the Thunderbolt collection. Nice to see that the Thunderbolt cable is included, too! |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Can't these be an external "Fusion" drive with the latest OSX? If so these drive boards should include a SSD stick slot in addition to whatever hard drives they might use to get price and capacity figures that sell drives.
Apple does not disclose plans giving them a near year first mover advantage, which they typically also squander while they prevent their third party ecosystems from implementing. TB is the superior example and Lightning is a close second. Rocketman Did a 25 GB file transfer yesterday on what I presume was USB2 and it took 7 hours.
__________________
Think Different-ly! The President campaigned against Congress. D Sen is led by D Sen ML Reid and D VP and Sen Pres Biden, under orders of D Pres Obama. http://www.gop.gov/indepth/jobs/tracker |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#43 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#44 |
|
I am happy....
more good makers and in general more makers of Thunderbolt hardware can mean lower and lower prices and maybe, faster adoption of the technology
Not a steal, but options in general are not hurtful ![]() ![]()
__________________
Mac Pro 2010 3.06 Westmere version, 12 Core 64 GB RAM, 4 TB , iPhone 5 (black) |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Ohhhhh, d2, the worst external disc that I ever owned (loud, freezes the system all the time). I'm never buying Lacie again.
__________________
iMac 27'' Core i7 2.93, 12 GB RAM, SSD (best. decision. ever.) |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#46 |
|
No daisy chaining is a dealbreaker. Not too bummed out though. I've always preferred OWC stuff.
__________________
15" rMBP, 2.3 GHZ, 16 GB RAM | 32 GB White iPhone 5 | 16 GB Black iPad 4 @bwhli | http://bwhli.com | MainStage for Musical Theatre |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#48 | |
|
Quote:
A USB 2.0 hard drive should be able to transfer at 20 - 30MB/s... 25GB should only take ~30 minutes. Were you transferring a lot of small files? If so, Thunderbolt won't help since random I/O is a bottleneck for mechanical drives. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#49 |
|
I agree and I've recently learnt that any drive can fail at anytime, no matter the cost or the pretty box it comes in.
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
Terminal
Quote:
sudo pmset -a disksleep 30 sudo commands usually require you have an administrator account and to enter you password. If it's the first time you run sudo you'll also see a warning message that you can ignore. That said entering commands prefaced with sudo can be dangerous to your system if you don't know what your doing. The -a flag equates to all disks. Enter: man pmset for help with other options. |
||
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 AM.








Linear Mode
