Tap on the spot you want for the address to load at bottom of screen. Flick up on the address and street view is there.
That's awesome. Thank you.
Tap on the spot you want for the address to load at bottom of screen. Flick up on the address and street view is there.
Use any word you want - real, powerful, good... None of these free map apps are worth anything unless all you do is search for POIs.
So since everyone is freaking out in their pants about the new Google Maps app... Did anyone actually even use it yet?
The app looks very nice and seems to be quite smooth. I have not even used the navigation feature yet, but these three things above are what I immediately noticed upon opening the app with excitement.
- Absolutely NO ACCESS to contacts... wtf??? Even the free crappy MapQuest app has this!!
- No Street View?? This is one of my favorite things about Google Maps in general, especially when researching the location of new places you haven't been to yet. The mobile web version has this, so why doesn't the app??
- No voice search?? Honestly that's one of the most convenient things about Siri and Apple Maps. Quickly ask where the closest [whatever] is and get right into the navigation. Google has great voice search for their maps (I've used it on previous Android phones) and it would be nice to have that convenience here.
I'm one of the apparent few that has had zero issues with Apple's Maps app, although I greatly missed Google. My excitement has been severely deflated for now though. I'll keep it and use it for a while to see how it goes, but it sure is missing some key features...
Notice:
1) The first time you run it, they alert you that data will be sent to Google for testing purposes.
2) Google SW are always Beta for a long time.
3) To access contacts, you can't. You must be logged in to Google and store contacts there.
4) The will store history there once you are logged in
5) Your information will be used for Google Latitude
6) That combined with the data sent for traffic updates, testing purposes and linked to you Google account, they know EVERYTHING!! Where you are, where you been and when, how fast you were driving and all your contacts.
7) With a warrant, the can gather everything about you. That is how Petraeus' was caught off the Gmail account.
That is one of the reasons Apple's Google Map was dumped.
And they complained that the old Apple map had data containing where you were in cache!
Ironically, we wouldn't have gotten this Google Maps app at all if Apple didn't kick out Google from their own maps app and try to make their own.
We'd still be stuck with a non-voice-navigation limited functionality app.
Notice:
1) The first time you run it, they alert you that data will be sent to Google for testing purposes.
2) Google SW are always Beta for a long time.
3) To access contacts, you can't. You must be logged in to Google and store contacts there.
4) The will store history there once you are logged in
5) Your information will be used for Google Latitude
6) That combined with the data sent for traffic updates, testing purposes and linked to you Google account, they know EVERYTHING!! Where you are, where you been and when, how fast you were driving and all your contacts.
7) With a warrant, the can gather everything about you. That is how Petraeus' was caught off the Gmail account.
EDIT: With no opt-out.
That is one of the reasons Apple's Google Map was dumped.
And they complained that the old Apple map had data containing where you were in cache!
What I don't get is why google keeps making these great apps for ios and offering them for free. They even make the apps better and more intuitive then for there own operating system which is even more of a head scratcher.
Unless apple is paying them behind the scenes I don't get it. It seems counter competitive.
If I were Samsung, HTC, LG etc I wouldn't be too happy about this.
I haven't read through all the responses to see if this has been brought up yet. Does anyone have a clue what the mobile data usage will be like with this app? I know Apple's vector-based maps go very light on the data usage and can actually buffer enough map data to keep you going during a signal loss for quite a while... Just curious.
I'm still trying to figure out if you can access contacts. Street View is definitely there, though. Look a few posts back for how to find it. The lack of voice search is a bit strange, considering that their Search app's voice feature is incredible.
I'm still trying to figure out if you can access contacts. Street View is definitely there, though. Look a few posts back for how to find it. The lack of voice search is a bit strange, considering that their Search app's voice feature is incredible.
So since everyone is freaking out in their pants about the new Google Maps app... Did anyone actually even use it yet?
The app looks very nice and seems to be quite smooth. I have not even used the navigation feature yet, but these three things above are what I immediately noticed upon opening the app with excitement.
- Absolutely NO ACCESS to contacts... wtf??? Even the free crappy MapQuest app has this!!
- No Street View?? This is one of my favorite things about Google Maps in general, especially when researching the location of new places you haven't been to yet. The mobile web version has this, so why doesn't the app??
- No voice search?? Honestly that's one of the most convenient things about Siri and Apple Maps. Quickly ask where the closest [whatever] is and get right into the navigation. Google has great voice search for their maps (I've used it on previous Android phones) and it would be nice to have that convenience here.
I'm one of the apparent few that has had zero issues with Apple's Maps app, although I greatly missed Google. My excitement has been severely deflated for now though. I'll keep it and use it for a while to see how it goes, but it sure is missing some key features...
be carefull, your statement is well written.
every one wants competition for apple, and when they get it, those folks shout 'embarrasing for apple'.
google was holding apple hostage with an archaic maps app that google refused to update. apple called their bluff, and google caughs up their trumping card. if any thing, apple forced google's hand, and apple products are now better. apple wins, the consumer wins, google lost their lofty place in the ios echosystem. who wins the most?
So since everyone is freaking out in their pants about the new Google Maps app... Did anyone actually even use it yet?
The app looks very nice and seems to be quite smooth. I have not even used the navigation feature yet, but these three things above are what I immediately noticed upon opening the app with excitement.
- Absolutely NO ACCESS to contacts... wtf??? Even the free crappy MapQuest app has this!!
- No Street View?? This is one of my favorite things about Google Maps in general, especially when researching the location of new places you haven't been to yet. The mobile web version has this, so why doesn't the app??
- No voice search?? Honestly that's one of the most convenient things about Siri and Apple Maps. Quickly ask where the closest [whatever] is and get right into the navigation. Google has great voice search for their maps (I've used it on previous Android phones) and it would be nice to have that convenience here.
I'm one of the apparent few that has had zero issues with Apple's Maps app, although I greatly missed Google. My excitement has been severely deflated for now though. I'll keep it and use it for a while to see how it goes, but it sure is missing some key features...
be carefull, your statement is well written.
every one wants competition for apple, and when they get it, those folks shout 'embarrasing for apple'.
google was holding apple hostage with an archaic maps app that google refused to update. apple called their bluff, and google caughs up their trumping card. if any thing, apple forced google's hand, and apple products are now better. apple wins, the consumer wins, google lost their lofty place in the ios echosystem. who wins the most?
After comparing the two apps this morning, I actually prefer the aesthetics of Apple's maps, especially the transitions when you zoom in. But you can't compare the accuracy and detail of google's maps. It's good to have both, but I hope this just pushes apple to truly work on making their maps a better experience.
What does free have to do with it ? The point is, the developer sets the price, Apple's review has nothing to do with price and they approved navigation and mapping applications long before this ever was in the app store.
The fact that it is Free changes nothing to Apple's review process. There is much precedent here, Apple is admitting nothing new.
Anyway, to answer your question : Maps+.
(and incidently, they reverted to Google Maps earlier this year after having been forced to Apple Maps by virtue of being a MapKit application).
I'm not very concerned with these shortcomings right now. This is their first version and nobody can deny that they really nailed it for a first version app. This isn't a shoddy effort like the new YouTube app. Voice search and contact access will come in due time.
This Google Maps app ALONE is worth the price of admission of the iPhone 5.
Apple should really be kicking back some of the profits they make off iOS now back to Google.
If Google acted like Apple, they would have kept Google Maps exclusive to Android. Instead, they allowed iOS users have it for FREE.
Google supports customer choice whereas Apple believes in creating a monopoly.
Google believes in offering the best user experience despite jeopardizing potential revenues whereas Apple believes in protecting potential revenues despite jeopardizing the user experience.
Bravo Google! Thanks for making our iPhones complete again.
95% of iPhone users won't know or care and will continue to use Apple Maps.
Finally!!!!!!! I can search for a local business and have intelligent results!