Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old Dec 13, 2012, 01:03 PM   #1
Cheese&Apple
macrumors Demi-God
 
Cheese&Apple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Toronto
New Nikkor 70-200 f/4 vs f/2.8

There's a fair bit of buzz going around about the new Nikkor 70-200 f/4 FX that is now shipping. Without doubt, this is a great lens. But, I'm wondering about this lens compared to the Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8 FX VRII and Nikon's pricing:

A new f/2.8 = $2,000 (now on sale from $2,400)
The new f/4 = $1,400

That's a $600 savings. But if I do decide to get the optional tripod collar from Nikon ($200) and have to get 2 new filters ($400) because my 77mm filters won't fit the 67mm f/4, the price comparison is:

A new f/2.8 = $2,000
The new f/4 = $2,000

I know there is a VR improvement (VRII vs. VRIII) and the 690g weight difference between the two can be a factor but seriously, is the weight really that important given the advantage of f/2.8 over f/4? Just looking for thoughts as I've never schlepped a 1540g lens.
Cheese&Apple is offline   0 Reply With Quote

 
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
iPad Mini: Is Retina worth $200 more if you can get used mini 1st gen for $200? Kendo iPad 8 Oct 23, 2013 02:38 PM
Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/4G ED VR John.B Digital Photography 4 Oct 27, 2012 02:51 AM
Testing out my new Nikkor 85mm f/1.8G on my son. Razeus Digital Photography 3 Jun 1, 2012 07:52 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:32 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC