|Dec 13, 2012, 01:03 PM||#1|
New Nikkor 70-200 f/4 vs f/2.8
There's a fair bit of buzz going around about the new Nikkor 70-200 f/4 FX that is now shipping. Without doubt, this is a great lens. But, I'm wondering about this lens compared to the Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8 FX VRII and Nikon's pricing:
A new f/2.8 = $2,000 (now on sale from $2,400)
The new f/4 = $1,400
That's a $600 savings. But if I do decide to get the optional tripod collar from Nikon ($200) and have to get 2 new filters ($400) because my 77mm filters won't fit the 67mm f/4, the price comparison is:
A new f/2.8 = $2,000
The new f/4 = $2,000
I know there is a VR improvement (VRII vs. VRIII) and the 690g weight difference between the two can be a factor but seriously, is the weight really that important given the advantage of f/2.8 over f/4? Just looking for thoughts as I've never schlepped a 1540g lens.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|iPad Mini: Is Retina worth $200 more if you can get used mini 1st gen for $200?||Kendo||iPad||8||Oct 23, 2013 02:38 PM|
|Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/4G ED VR||John.B||Digital Photography||4||Oct 27, 2012 02:51 AM|
|Testing out my new Nikkor 85mm f/1.8G on my son.||Razeus||Digital Photography||3||Jun 1, 2012 07:52 AM|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 PM.