|
|
#1 |
|
AMD Radeon 8000M Series
Will the next refresh of rMBP include 8870M?
March maybe? |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Thats a gaming card.
And highly doubt it. I possibly think it will be another NVIDIA.
__________________
17" MacBook Pro (Early 2011), 2.2GHz i7 Quad, 16GB RAM, 128GB SSD+1TB HDD@5400rpm 11" MacBook Air (Mid 2012), 2.0GHz i7 Dual, 8GB RAM, 256GB Flash iPhone 5 (White), 32GB
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 |
|
|
1
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Quote:
I wouldnt truly consider it as a gaming card though. Besides, I think 2GB of vRAM would shoot the price up of MBP.
__________________
17" MacBook Pro (Early 2011), 2.2GHz i7 Quad, 16GB RAM, 128GB SSD+1TB HDD@5400rpm 11" MacBook Air (Mid 2012), 2.0GHz i7 Dual, 8GB RAM, 256GB Flash iPhone 5 (White), 32GB
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I hope they stick with nvidia. Their drivers tend to be better.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 |
|
I dont understand your sentence but NVIDIA has better drivers than AMD.
__________________
17" MacBook Pro (Early 2011), 2.2GHz i7 Quad, 16GB RAM, 128GB SSD+1TB HDD@5400rpm 11" MacBook Air (Mid 2012), 2.0GHz i7 Dual, 8GB RAM, 256GB Flash iPhone 5 (White), 32GB
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Not on Mac apparently....
__________________
MBP 15" 2011 | Core i7 2.2Ghz | 16GB | 6750M | Corsair Performance Pro 256GB SSD rMBP 15" 2012 | Core i7 2.6Ghz | 16GB | GT 650M | 256GB SSD |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 |
|
It doesn't matter as long as the next iteration of the rMBP has improved performance across the board.
Also Both NVIDIA and AMD have driver problems, neither are best and it depends. They've both had great drivers and bad in the past. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#10 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#11 |
|
would be nie to have a 17" rMBP with nvidia 680mx
__________________
17" MBP 2011 16GB RAM 500 RAID-0 SSD 15" MBP 2010 8GB RAM/ SSD; 1phone 4S 32gb, IPADs; time capsule; var. gens ipods
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#12 |
|
AMD have terrible driver support. In the 7970 desktop series, it took almost a year before drivers really were able to capture the whole potential of the GPU architecture.
__________________
rMBP With LG Screen IR after 3 months Purchased just after launch |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Quote:
$75 after rebate. Apple will gouge you though, even though they can easily absorb the cost. OP, read up on the 8870m, is basically a downclocked 7870m. I don't know why or how AMD is doing this, the 8870m will actually have less performance than the 7870m. It is not sea islands, it is gcn. http://www.hardware.fr/news/12818/am...-hd-8000m.html |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#15 |
|
It seems though that AMD wants to push the 8800M series into the mainstream GPU spot. The one that is currently firmly held by the 650M and formerly 540M, 6750M, 5650M, 330M, 240M, ...
In pure TDP it could reach this low as the 7850 is already rated at 32W. I doubt it is really any better than the 650M. The next big improvement is a long time of all we get this time around is minor refreshes and rebrands.
__________________
15" MBP 2010 AG, 256GB Samsung 830, 1TB HDD; ML iPhone 3GS running iOS 5 |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#16 | ||
|
Quote:
not necessarily, for graphics professional this would be thousand times better than a higher clocked 650m, gcn arch is miles and miles ahead of kepler when it comes to compute performance Quote:
the problem is the card is miles and miles ahead of the 650m as well. one score around 3k while heavily overclocked, while the 7850m scores 3600 stock, with an oc, it reaches the same level as the 7770 ghz edition, with the new drivers its around 4k, the numbers are from 3dmark11 btw so to put simply the performance of the 7870m is very darn close to the performance of the 675m, and that is a gaming card at a tdp of 100w, damn great design and the tdp of the 7870m according to what I saw is 45w, the same as the 650m |
|||
|
|
1
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17 AM.






17" MacBook Pro (Early 2011), 2.2GHz i7 Quad, 16GB RAM, 128GB SSD+1TB HDD@5400rpm
Linear Mode
