So let me get this straight. Steve Jobs was never good enough to make the small list. He only created a hugely successful company at age 21, went on to create two more companies, one he sold for millions, the other he sold for billions, returned to his old company and made it the most valuable company in the world with some of the most popular products ever.
But Mark Zuckerberg gets it for creating Facebook, which luckily became popular because it wasn't the first social site and really not very original. Tim makes the list by inheriting a already established company. Do the people at Time Magazine have any credibility? Steve Jobs has done more in a year than either Tim or Mark ever have and dare I say ever will.
I never considered Steve Jobs a great humanitarian, I know he wasn't a very humble person, and I personally didn't think of him as a person of the year either. I know the that the person of the year is not all about being a saint or being charitable, but if the requirement to be Times "Person of the year" is to be an mass murdering tyrant (Hitler, Stalin) or a hardcore dork (Mark) then the recognition is really not that credible.
Sorry Tim, your a good business man, but you are not Person of the year at this time. And Time Magazine, your overall person of the Year list for the majority of the past years Sucks! Barack Obama? Really? 4 years of no progress, no accomplishments. Oh wait, let me correct myself, he did get elected twice for doing really nothing, I guess thats a little surprising.