Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

jean5927

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Feb 27, 2009
6
0
I'm tuning my MacPro 4,1 to fit a project to be edited in FCPX with 50+ hrs of footage in full HD. It's a 2.93 quad, 12GB RAM and stock GT120 video card, osx 10.6.8. The upgrade focus is on disk space and performance, and with the help of these forums and others, this is what I've come up with, and just before I splurge on 7 disks, I would like your experienced input about the soundness of the plan.

For the performance part, I have in mind 3 x 2TB WD RE4 disks in RAID0 setup with disk utility, and 4 x 3TB WD RED for an external Drobo for backup only, via FW800 (already bought the unit). Then a Crucial M4 256GB SSD in DVD bay 2 as a boot + applications disk. I'm split as whether to go with 3 x 2TB RE4s or 2 x 3TB RE4s (almost same price), and thus win an extra internal drive bay.

The machine is also being used for audio editing in ProTools 9, has 600 MB of recorded audio which needs to be available, and then there is a 500+ MB library of data/photos. I have a 2TB Black Caviar I intend to use for user/audio/data in drive bay 0, haven't had any issues with the 2TB single disk and the flow of audio.

I tried a Radeon 6870 at some point, and was not impressed with its performance FCPX-wise, so I plan to stick with the stock card until stuck.

My focus is on a responsive system that loads and handles all the footage nicely, and integral to this plan is to have an onsite daily backup to the Drobo, using CCC. Whaddya think?
 

JesterJJZ

macrumors 68020
Jul 21, 2004
2,443
808
2 disk raid0 will be fine for something like 1080p prores. It's fine going over firewire on g-raids, internal sata will be much better. I would use a separate drive for protools projects, I use a 1TB velociraptor for that.
 

jean5927

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Feb 27, 2009
6
0
I went for the 2 x 3TB for the RAID0 configuration, will install one of these days. I found a good deal on the Dell U2713HM 27" display, and wow, what an upgrade is a 27" inch display vs a 20"...
Thanks for your input!
 

SDAVE

macrumors 68040
Jun 16, 2007
3,574
601
Nowhere
I went for the 2 x 3TB for the RAID0 configuration, will install one of these days. I found a good deal on the Dell U2713HM 27" display, and wow, what an upgrade is a 27" inch display vs a 20"...
Thanks for your input!

Put the display a bit far away so your eyes won't hurt, especially if you're wearing glasses.
 

wonderspark

macrumors 68040
Feb 4, 2010
3,048
102
Oregon
I went for the 2 x 3TB for the RAID0 configuration, will install one of these days. I found a good deal on the Dell U2713HM 27" display, and wow, what an upgrade is a 27" inch display vs a 20"...
Thanks for your input!

I'm confused on what 3TB RE4 drive you got. What is the part number?
 

jean5927

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Feb 27, 2009
6
0
Put the display a bit far away so your eyes won't hurt, especially if you're wearing glasses.

You have a good point; the display is so much brighter than my previous Cinema Display 20", so it runs at 70% brightness and has a dark background to make it easier on the eyes. Changing the settings on the Dell is a bit fiddly, but that matte, tight picture is a serious upgrade. I found that having good light around the workspace is more of an issue now.


I'm confused on what 3TB RE4 drive you got. What is the part number?

I got the WD RE WD3000FYYZ, am in the process now of transferring the FCPX libraries to it, too early to report about their performance. Apparently WD now calls their new RE4s just RE.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.