Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 1, 2013, 04:57 PM   #1
salacious
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2011
raw fine tuning... aperture 3

so i mainly use my dslr as a filmmaker, however i do use it for photos aswell, so took some xmas snaps and noticed that when i loaded raw photos into aperture, it went from a flat picture to one that was really boosted in contrast/saturation which isnt what i expected from a raw file and infact makes all my pictures look like a jpeg file.

that was until i went into raw fine tuning, for some reason (im not an aperture expert so have no idea of the purpose) the boost and hue boost were both at 1.00 which when i reduced it down to boost 0.20 and hue boost 0.0 the picture looked exactly more or less as it should have in the first place?

i use a canon 600d so is this something that was supposed to do in the first place? why would apple put such a horrible preset in?

am i wrong to reduce the boost?

your thoughts please.
salacious is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 06:00 PM   #2
MCAsan
macrumors 68020
 
MCAsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Atlanta
Calibrated monitor?
__________________
Retina MBP 11,3 2.6GHz | 16GB | 1TB
Thunderbolt Display
iPhone 5s | Silver | 64GB | AT&T
iPad Air | Silver | 128GB | WiFi only
MCAsan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 06:33 PM   #3
salacious
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCAsan View Post
Calibrated monitor?
nothing to do with monitor, the colours are saturated way too high using apples default which is 1.o for both boosts.
salacious is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 05:58 AM   #4
mtbdudex
macrumors 65816
 
mtbdudex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SE Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by salacious View Post
nothing to do with monitor, the colours are saturated way too high using apples default which is 1.o for both boosts.
wrong, default is 1.0 for saturation and 0.0 for vibrancy, both are the neutral value, the mid-point of the sliders. if you go to 0 on saturation that takes you to B&W.

Look here, go to lesson 8 correcting color:
http://www.amazon.com/Apple-Pro-Training-Series-Aperture/dp/0321898648#reader_0321898648

Is your monitor calibrated?
__________________
Mike R, P.E. ;iMac 27"(i7), iPad2, iPhone5s, 24" iMac, TV(160)
Canon: 70D+lens:70-200 L f2.8 IS II/TC 1.4x 2x/15-85/f1.4 50;580EX II,FEISOL tripod CT-3441S
DIY acoustic panels. . .HT Project
mtbdudex is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 11:39 AM   #5
salacious
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtbdudex View Post
wrong, default is 1.0 for saturation and 0.0 for vibrancy, both are the neutral value, the mid-point of the sliders. if you go to 0 on saturation that takes you to B&W.

Look here, go to lesson 8 correcting color:
http://www.amazon.com/Apple-Pro-Training-Series-Aperture/dp/0321898648#reader_0321898648

Is your monitor calibrated?
sorry i believe you have misunderstood me as im a bit crap at explaining things.

yes the dell u2410 is calibrated using colormunki, the prints are more or less exactly the same so in that regard i have no issue as i also do video editing.

what im trying to say is that in the RAW FINE TUNING there are two options at the top which at default on mine is 1.0/ 1.0 the image is what iv adjusted it to to provide more accurate colours rather than the boosted colours that i get from a flat image.
Attached Images
 
salacious is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 12:26 PM   #6
DirtySocks85
macrumors 65816
 
DirtySocks85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wichita, KS
I don't think you're crap at explaining it, I understood exactly what you were talking about. I think it all depends on what the individual photog wants for his/her images. If you think about the way that RAW image data works, Aperture has to start somewhere. So it starts with settings that most closely resemble what the jpeg approximation from the camera would likely look like, but that's where the advantages of RAW shine, if that's not the look you want, just reduce those sliders. I don't think that there's any wrong to it. I always shoot RAW, and I have a bad habit of leaving those sliders where they are, even if I should probably reduce them sometimes.

Unfortunately, if you plan on regularly reducing these sliders I don't think there's a way to reset the defaults, but you should be able to put them where you want and add it as a one click preset if you'd prefer that as a starting point.

Hope I could be of help, as I'm fairly new to all of this myself.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtbdudex View Post
wrong, default is 1.0 for saturation and 0.0 for vibrancy, both are the neutral value, the mid-point of the sliders. if you go to 0 on saturation that takes you to B&W.

Look here, go to lesson 8 correcting color:
http://www.amazon.com/Apple-Pro-Training-Series-Aperture/dp/0321898648#reader_0321898648

Is your monitor calibrated?
Not wrong, OP wasn't talking about Saturation and Vibrancy values, OP was talking about RAW fine tuning values for Hue Boost and Boost.
__________________
13"MacBook Pro (mid 2010) iPhone 5 32GB Black/Slate iPod Classic 80GB
Canon EOS Rebel T3i Nexus 7
JStiles Photography Website JStiles Photography on Facebook
DirtySocks85 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:00 PM   #7
salacious
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtySocks85 View Post
I don't think you're crap at explaining it, I understood exactly what you were talking about. I think it all depends on what the individual photog wants for his/her images. If you think about the way that RAW image data works, Aperture has to start somewhere. So it starts with settings that most closely resemble what the jpeg approximation from the camera would likely look like, but that's where the advantages of RAW shine, if that's not the look you want, just reduce those sliders. I don't think that there's any wrong to it. I always shoot RAW, and I have a bad habit of leaving those sliders where they are, even if I should probably reduce them sometimes.

Unfortunately, if you plan on regularly reducing these sliders I don't think there's a way to reset the defaults, but you should be able to put them where you want and add it as a one click preset if you'd prefer that as a starting point.

Hope I could be of help, as I'm fairly new to all of this myself.

----------



Not wrong, OP wasn't talking about Saturation and Vibrancy values, OP was talking about RAW fine tuning values for Hue Boost and Boost.
bingo just the info what i was looking for.. thanks
salacious is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 03:38 PM   #8
Keleko
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
I seem to remember changing the default, or at least changing what Aperture did on import. Changing what it does in import is essentially changing the default.
Keleko is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aperture RAW conversion LongSticks Digital Photography 4 Mar 24, 2014 10:27 AM
RAW Fine Tuning Adjustment davidfarmerie Mac Applications and Mac App Store 4 Dec 25, 2013 10:59 AM
Anyone user RAW Fine Tuning in Aperture? VirtualRain Digital Photography 6 Jan 6, 2013 09:57 PM
Aperture Question about RAW cypriot Mac Applications and Mac App Store 6 Jun 18, 2012 01:21 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC