|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#276 |
|
|
1
|
|
|
#277 |
|
I actually love this feature and can't wait for it to be fixed. Keeps the politicians, telemarketers and such from calling during certain time while still allowing important calls from people that I want to talk to.
__________________
Pro, 2 X 2.8 Ghz Quad-Core 13" MacBook iPhone 4S 16 GB iPad 64 GB WiFi AT&T (1st Gen) Macbook Pro i7 Apple TV2 iPad 64 GB AT&T (3rd Gen)
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#278 |
|
Um..... Mine worked flawlessly. No sign of a bug for me.
__________________
Hmmmmmm.....beef with Apple........sounds delicious ![]() Acer Aspire (Yes it's a PC ) M3400, iPad (3rd Generation) iPod Classic 160GB and iPhone 5 in delicious black.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#279 |
|
This is just bad PR and bad programming = a bad Apple
Makes me feel that all this talk of Apple turning sour will be true. |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#280 |
|
You don't even have to turn it *on*. Leave it scheduled, but turn it off when it's supposed to turn off.
__________________
17" MBP (unibody), 2.66GHz i7, 8GB RAM, 750 GB HDD; iPhone 4s 64GB/Black |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#281 | |
|
Quote:
Now if you set "do not disturb" to 2:30am to 5am then there is a problem that needs testing. (I hope you can figure out what the problem is that happens once a year, and the other problem that also happens once a year, and I would hope someone tested that case). |
||
|
|
2
|
|
|
#282 | |
|
Quote:
I once ran into those problems and solved it using UNIX-time, which is much more reliable but far less flexible. I am sure that Apple can easily address this issue, especially because I am more into GNU/Linux and not as skilled as their engineers in this proprietary API.
__________________
FRIGN.de |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#283 | |
|
Quote:
2) If you're relying on a phone call to wake you up for work, maybe you shouldn't turn on a feature which could make you miss it if the person calls a bit early.
__________________
17" MBP (unibody), 2.66GHz i7, 8GB RAM, 750 GB HDD; iPhone 4s 64GB/Black |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#284 | |
|
Whilst I didn't have this issue, I did find that the "more than one call in three minutes" rule was ignored, leading to a very unhappy partner left outside the house in the early hours!
Is this related or a different issue? ---------- Quote:
If you had an alarm clock, put fresh batteries in it and they went dead overnight and you missed your alarm, I doubt you would be happy if the response you got from the battery company was "well you shouldn't RELY on this" etc.
__________________
13" Macbook Pro (Early 2011, 2.3 GHz, 8 GB RAM, 320 GB HD); iPhone 5 (Black, 16GB)
http://twitter.com/coffeemadman |
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#285 |
|
How do things just resolve itself? My DND does t seem to want to turn on as scheduled.
__________________
Because I'm an ahole.
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#286 | |
|
Quote:
Or just add the expected caller(s) to the list of people you allow calls from during the scheduled DND period, and remember to turn it off when it's supposed to be off until the 7th.
__________________
17" MBP (unibody), 2.66GHz i7, 8GB RAM, 750 GB HDD; iPhone 4s 64GB/Black |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#287 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
3
|
|
|
#288 | |
|
Quote:
It not so much that but more the fact that Apple tends to give responses like this quite often and has been having massive problems with alarms and anything schedule all the time. This is not the first time the New Year issue hit them. They have DST issues quite often and multiple times in a row. It sad that Apple is still having these massive embarrassing issues. Where I work we had one of these issue hit us this year and I can promise you that it will be the first and last time it hits us because it got added into require test casing before a release to make damn sure it does not happen again. We also shoved out a patch the day we found out about it with an extermely getto rigged patch just to buy us time to find and fix it correctly which yes we did do. |
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#289 | |
|
Quote:
Furthermore, there are several reasons the delay may be perfectly valid. For one, it could be date related and they know they will fix it in an upcoming patch, so the best solution is to wait it out. Would you prefer they push out a patch real fast that has a chance of causing other bugs? No matter how good they are, if you have insufficient testing this is a real possibility. I remember my moto droid several years back, and the bug that caused the camera autofocus to not work every other week or something like that till they fixed it. These things happen. Also, it may not be date related, but going to be fixed in the next patch, which is scheduled for the 7th. Same reasons apply here re: testing so I wont belabor the point. Everyone just settle down, grab your juice boxes and pacifiers, and wait for it to get fixed. If Apple "didn't care" they wouldn't have looked into it and either fixed it or determined it will correct itself on the 7th. Dear lord. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#290 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#291 | |||
|
Quote:
Also there is a high probability that your product is less complex with regards to configuration than the iPhone (essentially infinite when you add in the different combinations of apps the phone can have). This makes a huge difference in how smart it is to push out "an extermely getto rigged patch". I think Apple would have to be full of brainless idiots to do something like that with all the possibility of causing further harm and the blowback that causes. Not to mention it creates revision control headaches as they are not doubt working on newer code (6.1 beta) and this would be an earlier branch. Im sure they can handle something like that, but just sayin. ---------- Quote:
Granted from my other posts you will see I agree this is a minor, temporary annoyance, but wanted to let you know. ---------- Quote:
Granted I am assuming what someone else meant, so grain of salt and all that. |
||||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#292 |
|
Every year it conveniently resolves itself, only to come back next January 1st. So it never gets fixed.
__________________
15" MacBook Pro; Nikon D800; iPhone 5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#293 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
2012 rMPB, 2.3 Intel Core i7, 8GB Ram, 256 SSD; 2008 iMac, 24", 2.8GHz Core Two Duo, 2GB, 500GB, ATI RadeonHD2600; Time Capsule 500GB (1st Gen); ATV2; Airport Express; Black 64GB iPhone 4S |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#294 |
|
In the time it would take to fix the bug it will have fixed itself!
EDIT: beaten to it I see.
__________________
"That's quite obsessive isn't it?!" -Ive Last edited by powers74; Jan 3, 2013 at 11:28 AM. Reason: late |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#295 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#296 |
|
It's really quite simple:
Apple itself has the "Do Not Disturb" turned on until January 7. Don't disturb them! This is a feature, not a bug! |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#297 | |
|
Quote:
verb ( debugs, debugging , debugged ) [ with obj. ] identify and remove errors from (computer hardware or software) noun the process of identifying and removing errors from computer hardware or software. Alternatively: verb or noun - that which Apple doesn't do, apparently.
__________________
My first was a Mac+. Now I own an iPhone with 3.5x the pixels, a colour display, WiFi, 512x the RAM, >1500x the data storage, and 100x the speed. And it fits in the palm of my hand.
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#298 | |
|
Quote:
It's surprising how many people on here think that apple could rush out a fix before the weekend. Well they could but in doing so probably sacrifice some QA time and risk the fix breaking something else. Simply apple cannot win so rather than rush out a sloppy fix, they'll fix it right knowing it will resolve itself anyway and ensuring it won't happen next year. Well that's impressive since iOS did not have DND last January..... Lol. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#299 |
|
Missed a call from my company president this morning because of this. First time in years I've been directly affected by an Apple bug. Ironically I first learned about this issue here. What's puzzling is, the feature worked fine yesterday- took the phone out of DND right on schedule at 630 AM. So, I figured I was unaffected. But not today.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#300 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Read the thread: Post #235: The second year in a row in which programmers failed to catch another New Year's bug involving time based feature(s). If you read the thread before commenting, you would have also learned the "bugs" were easily found by simply reviewing the code. It's sloppy and simply brazen for Apple to dismiss this by telling people to "wait it out" as they did last year. QA should have taken last years dilemma into account and been more thorough in their reviews. Period. |
|||
|
|
2
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 PM.







Pro, 2 X 2.8 Ghz Quad-Core 

Linear Mode
